Posted by Lou Pilder on February 9, 2013, at 9:53:55
In reply to Re: Lou's response-eyeahm » schleprock, posted by SLS on February 9, 2013, at 9:13:01
> > > Lou
> >
> > Hey Lou, is this the rider on the white horse?
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDedUcmvgL8
>
> I don't think it is productive to ridicule the messenger.
>
> In this case, it is probably far more productive to not post at all in reply to the message.
>
>
> - ScottScott,
You wrote,[...In this case, it is probably far more productive to not post at all in reply to the message...].
I am unsure as to what you are wanting to mean here. If you could post answers tothe following, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
A. What are you wanting to mean by {productive}?
B. Why would it be {far more productive?}
C. What is the message that you see that is concerning a reply?
D. If tghe message could save lives or prevent a life-ruining condition or addiction, why would it be more productive to not post at all a reply to the message?
E. If taking the drugs could lead to death, or a mind-altered state to compel one to kill themselves and/or others, why would it be more productive to not reply at all to the message?
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1037675
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20130205/msgs/1037731.html