Posted by Lou Pilder on October 30, 2012, at 8:11:00
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-moarhey » Lou Pilder, posted by Dinah on October 30, 2012, at 7:35:35
> Lou, you have stated that you are trying to follow Dr. Bob's rules. Dr. Bob has clearly stated that if the poster who originates a thread points out that they wouldn't find posts of a certain kind helpful, then at that point it would be unsupportive to continue to make them.
>
> PrettyLady has invoked that rule. Please continue further discussions on another thread.
>
> D,
You have not specified what post of mine is a{certain kind}. If you could identify what post you want to mean, then I could have the opportunity ot respond to you here. If you are intending not to identify which post you are referring to, that could cause ill-will to be directed at me and I am defending myself here against false accusations and lies being posted here about me and are allowed to stand by Mr. Hsiung here. I want to stop this and the way for me that is available is to ask you to identify that particular post now. Mr Hsiung has commited what is called {waiver} here of his rules that allows now members to post hatred and defamation toward me here. The rules are waived for them so they are waived for me also. Please do not post anything that can be construed to think that there are two standards here and hold me to rules that others are not held to. In my response to P_L, I was responding to hate and defending myself against the heaping of lies and defamation and hate upon me here. No one can post lies and hate to someone and then say that they can not defend themselves by responding to the slander. Mr Hsiung is allowing this to fester and if I do not try to stop him, others could be filled with the poison of hate as thinking that it is supportive by him to post that to me for he has not sanctioned by his own rules the hate posted to me here. When I came here, I saw that Mr Hsiung would not let one match start a forest fire. I took him at his word. And I took him at his word that he would be doing what will be good for this community as a whole. Yet today, the hatred posted to me here is being orchistrated by the Wizzard of Babble by him allowing it to stand and collaberating with members and you want me to not respond to the hate and defend myself by not posting to the hate because of some rule that says that the innitiator of a thread can post lies and hate to you and then invoke that you can not post a response to the hate? That is not the rukle at all. The rule is that in the first post, the innitiator can restrict the responses, but I am responding to what she wrote to me which is different.
Here is a link to Mr Hsiung's attitude toward me and the collaberation that he asks for in relation to members and calling me The Prince of Death.
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20120228/msgs/1029662.html
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1029313
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20121029/msgs/1030294.html