Posted by Lou Pilder on October 15, 2012, at 6:27:27
In reply to Tardive Akathisia Pathogenesis, posted by neuroscience on October 15, 2012, at 4:38:58
> Hello, my first post. How is everyone?
>
> My information on the pathogenesis of dyskinesias is maybe out of date. I was wondering if there was any knew discoveries on this. Particularly on TA.
>
> "The pathogenesis of the tardive dyskinesia syndromes is unknown. No one hypothesis is able to explain the disorder, and more than one factor may be necessary.
> These factors include the development of dopamine-receptor supersensitivity, activation of dopamine D1 receptors, and loss of G-aminobutyric acid activity in the
> subthalamic nucleus." --Merritt Neurology 10th editionneuroscience,
The condition of tardive dyskinesia/dystonia/other appears in a percentage of people that take psychotropic drugs. The condition can be irreverible and life-ruining.
Yet today, millions of people take psychotropic drugs. Maybe they don't know what these drugs are and where they were developed and for what reason. They may also not know the chemical composition of the drugs and their history.
Many of the chemical constituants of some of the psychotropic drugs are the same as used in {nerve agents} used in mass-murder. And in agents used in riot control. And in inecticides, rat poison and chemical dyes. The chemicals way to kill is well-known as to how the nerves are shut down to cause death. This method of death is well-documented but I am prohibited from posting here this educational material by the nature of prohibitions made to me here by Mr Hsiung. I did start to develop this educational material here but was stopped by Mr Hsiung. You could do a search such as ,[Lou, Effexor] or ,[Lou, thlaidomide], or[Lou, phenol] and that might direct you to a thread here where I was stopped from continuing.
Now understand that when knowledge is prohibited from being told, an indoctrination could be fostered by the one prohibiting the knowledge from being told. An indoctrination that could lead to the deaths of pople that are prohibited from knowing what can not be told to them that could save their lives.
So let it be with those that want to still my voice in any way, be it the prohibition of posting of facts, facts that I think cold mark the difference between life and death, or the prohibiting me from posting the foundation of Judaism as revealed to me that IMHHHO could lead people out of the darkness of depression and addiction, save them from the horrors of tardive dyskinesia, and give them their lives back.
I would like to tell you the answer to your question for I know it, but I am prohibited from posting it here by the nature of the prohibitions posted to me here by Mr Hsiung.
I ask you, what benefit could outweigh the risk of one from taking psychotropic drugs that could cause tardive dyskinesia and such? And it is generally accepted that 42,000 people died just last year from psychotropic drugs and my math shows that with the marketing continuing on television that million of people could die from these drugs going forward and summing all the people that have died in the last 50 years from these drugs. Yet today, people in this community post to others to take chemicals that could rob them of their lives or leave them in a condition of disfigurement for the rest of their lives or give them diabetes that could lead to their blindness or amputation of their limbs and other life-ruining conditions.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1028704
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20121009/msgs/1028707.html