Posted by zazenducke on April 21, 2012, at 9:51:52
In reply to Re: Psychiatric drug induced Chronic Brain Impairment, posted by Willful on April 21, 2012, at 2:15:00
> I've read one or two of his books, and other statements he has made. I found them to be unsubstantiated and I don't see anything that has established any of the statements he made.
> I don't see that drugs are addictive. A benefit that leads someone to continue to take a drug is not an addiction; and difficulty or side effects from stopping a drug are not proof of addiction. In any way. Just because an addictive drug has characteristic A does not mean that everything that has characteristic A is an addictive drug. That type of thinking is a logical fallacy.
Whether or not a drug is addictive doesn't really matter as far as CBI is concerned. It is just the fact of taking the drug over a period of time.
> I would like to k now what evidence you see that support's Breggin's analysis.
The article was footnoted. Did you read all the references? Which ones do you disagree with?