Posted by Lou Pilder on February 20, 2012, at 9:21:18
In reply to Re: Solstice thread. » Lou Pilder, posted by SLS on February 20, 2012, at 7:37:51
> > > > Topamax treatment must be initiated at a very low dosage and titrated gradually in order to avoid cognitive side effects.
>
> You excised this line from the following post.
>
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20120212/msgs/1010913.html
>
> My words included the following:
>
> "I can't guarantee anything. If I were a doctor, and observed this in many of my patients and in those of my colleagues, I could be more confident in saying such things."
>
> Be careful not to post my words out of context. I will not tolerate it.
>
> > Just because someone posts concerning their promotion of a drug for children to take, their promotion could be short of the full understnding of the drug that they are promoting."
>
> You are not aware of the extent of my education, both in and post schooling. I believe you are intimating that I am not to be considered seriously because I "could be short of the full understnding of the drug" Using the term "could be" doesn't immunize you from incivility for your using the words that follow. I feel accused and put-down.
>
> > ...the drug that they are promoting.
>
> What do you mean by "promoting"? Do you think I have motives to suggest the efficacy of drugs for reasons that are not altruistic? I feel accused and put-down.
>
> I have decided to not report your post to administration this time. Please be careful in your treatment of my words in the future.
>
>
> - ScottFriends,
It is posted here that I took a line from such and such a post. But I did not.
Here is the poost in this thread that iis the subject here. I wouuld like for you that are interested to click on the link first, and then read the rest of my defense of myself here.
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20120212/msgs/1010901.html
now if you have clicked on that and examined it, you could see that the line that the other pposter here, came from this post which is not the same as the postt that I am said to have taken the sttatement out of.
Then, the post here in the link talks about taking Topomax. As I understand the grammatical structure of the statement, it is offering Topomax as something that the mother could have the child take which in my understanding of the word {promotion}, could include as that as being advocated. If there is another post about Topomax, I am not referring to that post, for the poster that I replied to posted the statement that is in the link to the post that I have posted the link to here.
There is much more to this....
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1010739
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20120212/msgs/1010963.html