Posted by Lamdage on June 23, 2011, at 11:47:40
In reply to Re: What I (also!) like about Nardil!, posted by Lamdage on June 23, 2011, at 11:38:33
> > Yes, but to be within that 40-45% would be grand. A friend has been maintaining on prozac for at least 10 years.
> >
> >
>
> Yet i just cant understand how pdocs can use a med that will help 1 out of 20 patients, probably 5 out of 20 will feel worse than before AND i couldnt put them on something new until 5 weeks have passed. If it was for nardil or parnate to have this washout period OK, but for a firstline treatment which is not really likely to be effective this is really poor. Doing this to any considerably depressed person should be considered a crime.
>
> Imagine how often it gets prescribed. How many suicides? How many people wasted years and years to come on med trials? To me this is clear evidence that neither the doctors nor the pharma companies give a damn.The most prescribed most profitable med and the poorest performance ive ever heard of. Something is seriously wrong
Refractory atypical double depression, severe
Social anxiety disorder, moderate
(C)Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, severe
ADD, inattentive, mild
Nardil 22.5mg
poster:Lamdage
thread:988654
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20110619/msgs/989179.html