Posted by Lou Pilder on September 10, 2009, at 21:23:05
In reply to Lou's reply-baz » bleauberry, posted by Lou Pilder on September 10, 2009, at 21:17:24
> > I'm sorry Lou I don't think I can help you understand any more if you haven't gotten it yet. You'll have to embark on your own research.
> >
> > Bizarre.
> >
> > Hey, just a friendly reminder. Nearly everyone here including myself is not a scientist or a researcher.
> >
> > This is a site where people are invited to share information and support. There is also a disclaimer to not believe everything you read. It is the responsibility of the reader to make their own decisions.
> >
> > Yeah I know, I can see it coming a mile away already....you want proof of everything I just said above, right? :-)
> >
> > Have a great day.
> >
> > > A. Have you been a visitor in a classroom or in a capacity that you were in a classroom?
> > > B. If so, in what capacity were you in to be in a classroom?
> > > C. If you were in a capacity to be in a classroom, what age were the students?
> > > D. If you were in a capacity to be in a classroom, and you were observing children in relation to those that were taking the chemicals you describe here, how did you know which children were taking the chemical(s) in their system or not?
> > > E. If you made some conclusion concerning the children taking the chemicals you describe into their system, what principles of reserch did you use to make any conclusion?
> > > F. redacted by respondent
> > > Lou
> >
> > bb,
> You wrote,[...It is the responsibility of the reader to make their own decisions...].
> To make a decision without all of the facts that could clarify the issues could have an adverse result. The member here that innitiated this thread is looking to other members for another way to come out from his/her situation. I would like for the innitiator to have as much infomation as possible before acting on any advice since psychotropic chemicals can cause death when taken with other psychotropic drugs sometimes unbeknownst to the one taking them as to the consequences that could happen. The danger here IMHO outweighs member's opinions that are not substaniated by facts and thearfore I ask for clarification and such so that readers could make a more responsible decision.
> You wrote,[...not all are sceintists or researchers here...]. That is a fact and because of that fact I ask for advice to be supported with facts so that the non-scientist could haver a better understanding of the issues in order to make a more informed decision. You wrote,[...Bazarre...]. I am unsure as to what you are wanting to mean by that here. Could you post here the criteria that you used to write that?
> Lou
>
> correction, as bazarre was bizarre
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:916101
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20090902/msgs/916437.html