Psycho-Babble Medication | about biological treatments | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

ECT

Posted by bleauberry on April 13, 2009, at 18:15:12

Department of Biological Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Dr, New York, NY 10032, USA. has1@columbia.edu

CONTEXT: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is highly effective for treatment of major depression, but naturalistic studies show a high rate of relapse after discontinuation of ECT. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of continuation pharmacotherapy with nortriptyline hydrochloride or combination nortriptyline and lithium carbonate in preventing post-ECT relapse. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted from 1993 to 1998, stratified by medication resistance or presence of psychotic depression in the index episode. SETTING: Two university-based hospitals and 1 private psychiatric hospital. PATIENTS: Of 290 patients with unipolar major depression recruited through clinical referral who completed an open ECT treatment phase, 159 patients met remitter criteria; 84 remitting patients were eligible and agreed to participate in the continuation study. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive continuation treatment for 24 weeks with placebo (n = 29), nortriptyline (target steady-state level, 75-125 ng/mL) (n = 27), or combination nortriptyline and lithium (target steady-state level, 0.5-0.9 mEq/L) (n = 28). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Relapse of major depressive episode, compared among the 3 continuation groups. RESULTS: Nortriptyline-lithium combination therapy had a marked advantage in time to relapse, superior to both placebo and nortriptyline alone. Over the 24-week trial, the relapse rate for placebo was 84% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70%-99%); for nortriptyline, 60% (95% CI, 41%-79%); and for nortriptyline-lithium, 39% (95% CI, 19%-59%). All but 1 instance of relapse with nortriptyline-lithium occurred within 5 weeks of ECT termination, while relapse continued throughout treatment with placebo or nortriptyline alone. Medication-resistant patients, female patients, and those with more severe depressive symptoms following ECT had more rapid relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that without active treatment, virtually all remitted patients relapse within 6 months of stopping ECT. Monotherapy with nortriptyline has limited efficacy. The combination of nortriptyline and lithium is more effective, but the relapse rate is still high, particularly during the first month of continuation therapy.

BASICALLY SAYS: If you respond and don't take meds, your relapse rate is 84% pretty soon. With meds, relapse is still high.

.BACKGROUND: Clinical trials indicate that electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the most effective treatment for major depression, but its effectiveness in community settings has not been examined. METHODS: In a prospective, naturalistic study involving 347 patients at seven hospitals, clinical outcomes immediately after ECT and over a 24-week follow-up period were examined in relation to patient characteristics and treatment variables. RESULTS: The sites differed markedly in patient features and ECT administration but did not differ in clinical outcomes. In contrast to the 70%-90% remission rates expected with ECT, remission rates, depending on criteria, were 30.3%-46.7%. Longer episode duration, comorbid personality disorder, and schizoaffective disorder were associated with poorer outcome. Among remitters, the relapse rate during follow-up was 64.3%.

BASICALLY SAYS: Relapse rate, if it works, is 64%. The chance of it working, in the real world, is 30% to 46%. Why is ECT said to be so great? My own experience with it seems to be more in line with the real world and not the sanitary biased clinical settings.

Each patient received an average of 47 bilateral M-ECT under general anaesthesia at one to five weeks' intervals for a mean period of 43 months. All of them were also treated by antipsychotics; in addition, 30% received mood stabilizers and 10% antidepressants. The dosage of antidepressants and mood stabilizers was reduced during M-ECT treatment, especially in patients with schizoaffective disorder, probably in relation with the effectiveness of ECT on mood symptoms. RESULTS: During M-ECT, the mean duration of yearly hospitalizations was decreased by 80% and the mean duration of each hospitalization by 40% with a better ability to take part in activities, sometimes even to return home or go back to work. There was also a positive effect on quality of life considering the severity of symptoms and the long psychiatric history of these patients. The possibility to go from a full time hospitalization to a day-care facility or to live in a halfway house can be considered as a huge progress. M-ECT was efficient on mood symptoms, delusions, anorexia, suicidal impetus, anxiety symptoms and increased cooperation and treatment compliance. Efficacy on obsessive compulsive symptoms was less obvious. There was no effect on dissociation and negative symptoms. Relapses essentially occurred after a stressful life event, a too long interval between the M-ECT sessions or, in 50% of the cases, without any obvious etiology. It required a revision of the M-ECT program and, most of the time, an hospitalization for full ECT treatment.

BASICALLY SAYS: Your hospital stays will continue, but be reduced, and you will need longterm ECT to at least stay well enough to leave the hospital and "sometimes" even return home or to a halfway house.

The findings suggest that mECT may have a role in reducing the rate and duration of hospital stay of patients with major depressive disorder.

WHOOP-TI-DO. CHEERS. Heck, remission isn't even on the radar screen.

BACKGROUND: ECT, an effective treatment for major depression, is associated with a high relapse rate. Roughly half of all responders during the acute treatment phase relapse during continuation treatment. Recent literature has pointed out an "efficacy-effectiveness gap" in outcomes of patients enrolled in study protocols when compared to "care as usual." This study compares the effectiveness of usual care versus protocolized pharmacotherapy in preventing relapse following ECT. METHODS: One hundred twenty-six depressed patients responded to acute ECT. Seventy-three were randomized to continuation pharmacotherapy consisting of nortriptyline, nortriptyline-plus-lithium, or placebo. The 53 patients that refused to participate in the randomized trial were followed naturalistically for 6 months or until depression relapse in usual care settings. RESULTS: All but one "usual care" patient received pharmacotherapy following ECT; 27 (51%) relapsed within 6 months. Only one usual care patient received continuation ECT as a first-line treatment. The "usual care" relapse rate was intermediate to the relapse rates of the patients receiving protocolized nortriptyline (60%) and nortriptyline-plus-lithium (39%), but superior to placebo (84%). CONCLUSIONS: The relapse rate associated with usual care following ECT was comparable to that of protocolized pharmacotherapy. This suggests that high relapse rates following ECT are not due solely to an "efficacy-effectiveness gap."

PMID: 17453654 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

It amazes me how every article starts off saying how great ECT is, and then goes on to show how poorly it actually is. Almost as if the reader is too stupid to put two and two together.

It was comforting though to at least see a hint of honesty in some of these studies where they actually admit relapse rates are very high, and remission rates a bit on the iffy side.

I think for someone who is so ill that they will spend a good deal of the rest of their lives in and out of hospitals, and they are not productive, and won't be, in society, then ECT probably is a decent option. It at least gives them the best life they can have under the circumstances.

I think its real calling is for chemotherapy patients in the hospital...helps them feel better, helps them forget, and actually helps kill the tumors.

One thing I discovered that could be a major fault of ECT is that it is usually stopped when the patient remits. If it were continued for a couple months past remission, my hunch is it would have some holding power.

ECT has its place. But it is overglorified for the majority of us.

The above articles were just a 15 minute sample of what I could find. Believe me, there is a lot more. Just too darn depressed today to do any more.


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Medication | Framed

poster:bleauberry thread:890415
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20090408/msgs/890415.html