Posted by bleauberry on April 10, 2009, at 5:34:54
In reply to Re: Luvox, others, FDA has been there before, posted by manic666 on April 10, 2009, at 4:11:23
Well, Phillipa, manic666 said it more bluntly than I would have, but really, would it maybe be healthier to read positive things instead of negative things? Would it maybe be tons better to read about inexpensive herbs you can treat yourself with that are deadly to Lyme bacteria? Natural adrenal support treatments that take the monkey of an endo out of the equation? Deciding on another med to switch to instead of Luvox?
Stuff like that? Ya know? The negatives and doom-n-gloom will only make disease worse, in my opinion. It does not represent an effort to move forward, but rather to stay stuck or move backward.
You are an email friend of mine and I have a lot of compassion for you. My words are meant to be caring and helpful, so I hope they are not mistakenly taken any other way.
As for serotonin syndrome, I thought it was fairly basic knowledge that any med having any effect on serotonin carries the risk, most especially when two different ones are combined. Or put it this way. Anyone who didn't know that luvox could be a player in a serotonin syndrome risk must have been living on Mars or Jupiter for the last 50 years.
poster:bleauberry
thread:889730
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20090408/msgs/889774.html