Posted by Think1234 on June 3, 2006, at 15:24:52
In reply to Re: Non-Consensual Research/SPECT » Think1234, posted by llrrrpp on June 3, 2006, at 13:34:43
I think the most obvious indication that my reaction to the SPECT scan was non-psychiatric and non-psychotic was the fact that I experienced double vision that eventually required prescription glasses to correct the double vision. So I did not experience double vision with the glasses, which might rule out a specifically Central Nervous System causality.
(to the ultratechnical, yes I know the retina is technically considerered part of the CNS).
While reading I would very often (1 out of 3 times) see the letters in double. I would not experience double vision at a long distance. During the vision test given by an optometrist I did report double vision at a long distance under the particular conditions of the test.
Recently, at least for the last 2-3 weeks since, I've broke my glasses. And therefor can't use them, I have not experienced double vision. So it seems, at least by what i've experinced so far, that whatever was causing the double vision to occur has healed itself.
Is anyone familiar with the subject of double vision correcting itself? Is that unusual?
Has anyone heard of double vision as a result of SPECT or PET scans?
poster:Think1234
thread:650844
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20060530/msgs/652428.html