Psycho-Babble Medication | about biological treatments | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Benzodiazepines, does it mean tolerance/dependence

Posted by sdb on March 16, 2006, at 18:31:37

In reply to Re: Put the horse down and step away! :^) » Declan, posted by yxibow on March 16, 2006, at 2:40:10

There are two studies which I think are interesting see below (full text babble me). One positive aspect is that you dont have any hard sideffects with benzodiazepines. I am not sure if they're beneficial in the longterm, there are not many studies available. But apart from studies, in the babble and elsewhere are longterm bz users who swear by their bz. They dont seem to have tolerance symptoms to the antianxiety effect, probably more to the antiseizure properties. Prazepam is a benzo I have taken myself and I agree with the study concerning the antidepressive action. When I tested some bz's (ketazolam indicated for spasticity) they were usefully to diminish a muscle spasticity in the under extremities. I am now looking for an other treatment option. I surrendered because of popular bz concerns and some other reasons.

~sdb

------------------------------------------------
Compared efficacy of prazepam and clomipramine in major depression with anxiety: a multicenter controlled study.

Lemoine P, Boulenger JP, Caillard V, Tanne N, Bonnet D.

Unite Clinique de Psychiatrie Biologique, C.H.S. Le Vinatier, Lyon Bron, France.

The efficacy of antidepressants is well established in major depressions, especially those with melancholic features. However, some anxiolytics also appear to have antidepressant properties at least for outpatients. 118 outpatients (25 males, 93 females, age: 18-60) with major depression according to DSM-III criteria, neither melancholic nor suicidal, reaching at least 27 on Montgomery and Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) and 19 on Hamilton anxiety rating scale (HARS) accepted to participate this double blind study carried out by 15 G.P.s coordinated by 3 psychiatrists. After a one week placebo wash-out-single-blind period, they were randomly, double blind, assigned to one of the two following groups: PR treated with prazepam (30-60 mg), a benzodiazepine anxiolytic or CL treated clomipramine, an imipramine antidepressant (75-150 mg). Patients were evaluated at days 0, 7, 14, and 28, using MADRS, HARS, Clinical Global Impression and Hopkins symptoms check list 58. In addition, G.P.s had to meet monthly for a case discussion group. Results: groups were comparable at day 0. A highly significant improvement of MADRS and HARS scores (p less than 0.001) was observed in the total population. For the completer population evolution was also significantly positive in all the parameters studied but, considering MADRS and HSCL scores, a difference in favor of CL is observed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Publication Types:
Clinical Trial
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial

PMID: 1775523 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

J Int Med Res. 1981;9(3):191-8. Related Articles, Links


Comparison of the therapeutic effect, tolerance and safety of ketazolam and diazepam administered for six months to out-patients with chronic anxiety neurosis.

Fabre LF, McLendon DM, Stephens AG.

Recently, it has been argued that benzodiazepines may not be safe or efficacious beyond 3 months continuous dosage. This study was designed to provide data regarding efficacy, safety, possible tolerance development, and possible withdrawal effects of administering ketazolam and diazepam for a 6-month period. Chronic anxiety patients were screened for participation according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of 139 patients, forty-four terminated prematurely for non-drug related reasons and are not included in the analysis. Of the ninety-five patients remaining, sixty-three were on ketazolam, and thirty-two on diazepam. Efficacy parameters included the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, Physician's Global Impressions, Target Symptoms, Self-Rating Symptom Scale, and Patient's Global Impressions. Patients were evaluated weekly for the first month except for Week 3, and then seen bi-weekly and rated monthly. The results of the study showed that ketazolam was as efficacious as diazepam in treating anxiety and resulted in fewer side-effects. No adverse effects were noted in either group. Both benzodiazepines were safe and well-tolerated. No tolerance or withdrawal effects were noted. The average doses were ketazolam Week 4 (50.0 mg), Week 24 (66.14 mg) and diazepam Week 4 (26.33 mg) and Week 24 (33.0 mg). An increase in anxiety occurred in a significant number of patients after termination of either drug. By 2 weeks after the last dose many patients were free of anxiety and did not require further treatment. These results demonstrate that benzodiazepines are safe and efficacious for at least 6 months of continuous dosage.


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


[621072]

Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Medication | Framed

poster:sdb thread:619438
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20060315/msgs/621072.html