Posted by Tomatheus on January 15, 2006, at 10:17:36
In reply to Re: Nardil (phenelzine) information » Tomatheus, posted by ed_uk on January 15, 2006, at 9:41:48
Ed,
You're always keeping me on my toes.
The inactive ingredients for the Concord U.K. Nardil and the Link Australian Nardil are clearly listed differently, but now I see that it's probably the case that the "coating" ingredient listed in Link's Nardil likely includes some -- if not all -- of the ingredients that are listed in Concord's Nardil but not Link's. So, considering that Concord holds Link's product license, I'd have to say that you're right about the two Nardils being the same; it's just that the inactive ingredients happened to be listed differently.
I apologize for my misleading conclusion. The facts in my lists were correct, but just listed in different ways, and I didn't interpret them correctly in my opening statements.
Tomatheus
poster:Tomatheus
thread:599003
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20060115/msgs/599287.html