Posted by jlbl2l on July 28, 2004, at 0:52:08
In reply to Nice post :) » Racer, posted by Sad Panda on July 27, 2004, at 23:24:44
chemists citations may be right, but experience by various millions of people shows otherwise. its foolish if you believe everything you read (pubmed). Same with TV and media. The cure to most dieases is to think "outside the box" something chemist may not do well (reminds me of a vulkin on star trek) - and i can prove that - when I and chemist tried to hypothesis about neurontin's mech. of action, all he could site was studies on pubmed (or other accalimed sourcres) while i on the other hand used VARIOUS sourcres including people and a range of unvonventional and various sources of course pubmed studies also - but i made linkups in my brain - hence - a hypothesis and something called a new idea using my imaginary. And in general, i basically figured out how to augment neurontin "poop out" (with some of chemists help)
But his attitude & manner and unjustifiable attacks are all clearly towards me
IMO that chemist suffers from the following conditions (A) Ego complex B) Insecurity
Also one would wounder someone who is so smart and has SO many credentials is nearly able to spend 75%-85% of his time responding to posts at this message board that put down opinions of others or even try be perfect over anyone elses response. Makes you wonder who is this person and what did/does he do for his life?Bottle line : He attacked my opinion for no reason and it was not even part of the orginal thread and even in a manipulated way tried to doubt my association with the NCF and my skills as a researcher on things not releated to even this board...
Some examples below and feel free to quote the original text.
Oh, and REMEMBER, this has NOTHING to do with the original topic, chemist decided to attack my "OPINION" in the following threads instead, but then claimed that I didnt stay on the main subjects after awhile...well hmmm yeah ... you wanted me to back up my opinion with some sweaping report, right? ha, a major contradiction there, don't you say?
<ASSUMPTION>
including you - have reported hallucinations while forcing themselves to stay awake after taking a sedative-hypnotic. this information is damaging to your credibility in that you have stated that you have actually performed this experiment"<END ASSUMPTION>
COMMENTS : I never said i forced myself to stay awake! Oh yes and now you damage my credibilty with the NCF. Thats OK CALL GAIL KANSKY (president of the NCF) and ask I'f I am a volunteer researcher : the answer will be : "yes, why? who is this?" Plus my research skills rtc... dont even bother questiong my credibilty. I might not have a degree such as yours but that sure doesnt know i know more than you on MANY things. that was a very cheap shot.<MAJOR ASSUMPTIONS, GENERAL INDIRECT ATTACKS)
there is the issue of the one drug that is not FDA approved or available in the U.S., which indicates that you were in another country when you performed that experiment, or that you have obtained the drug illegally and performed the experiment here, in the U.S. in conclusion, this is not a personal attack<END>
COMMENT : LETS SEE, ASSUMING I PERFORMED AN EXPERIMENT, BOUGHT ILLEGALLY, TRAVELED TO ANOTHER COUNTRY AND "EXPERIMENT" ONCE AGAIN, OH BUT HE FORGOT - COULD I LIVE IN ANOTHER COUNTRY? COULD THIS BE A LEGITMATE PRESCRIPTION? I think anyone can get the point by now... chemist was out of line. then he says : this is not a personal attack" I hope Dr. Bob see this really.. I guess chemist was protecting himself from getting his post deleted or banned again for a week maybe with that statemet..heheh(ASSUMPTIONS ACCUSATIONS ATTACKS on CREDIBILITY)
you claim that you ``know quite a bit and have numerous hookups'' because you claim to study autoimmune diseases and ``a lot of other immune related diseases,'' and are a ``volunteer researcher for the national chronic fatigue foundation.'' (this is from your post at http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20040724/msgs/370390.html)
given your extensive knowledge and research position, i am confused: you conduct research based on google searches instead of peer-reviewed literature? and you have actually taken all three drugs - 1 of which is not marketed in the U.S., so i assume you obtained it illegally or tried it while abroad - in a manner inconsistant with their proper use? why?COMMENTS : noticing how he says the world claim? ohh geeez, chemist claims he did this and that cause he has a degree. don't believe anyone - this is a bessage board. it isn't fair what your going at all and I hope Dr. Bob reads this. This really sums it up - mean once again claming i did a legal thing! or this or that in a post unrelated to this. what mood was he in that night, forgot to take your meds ?
These are evident enough clearly speuculative and presoumptious and accusations and are very indirect and manipulative towards me, my illtelligence, and who I am afflicated with; my drug habits (assuming i have any) (even when chemist doesnt know where I live) he assumes the US or abraod or illegal.. still none of his biz and ALL SPECULATIVE AND PRESUMPTIOUS.If this is not enough to convience who was right or wrong here I dont know what will. I asnwered what i could to dan originally and it was my opinion that sleeping meds, the "w" kinds CAN COMMONLY cause hallucinations at regular doses mostly when you dont close your eyes and sleep (IE: stay awake) before the sleepiness hits, you can experience hallcinations and i said it was dangerous to drive with these drug and be careful.
Wow I was giving mindblowing wrong info, enough for chemist to start in with me like that?
You decide.
Jason
poster:jlbl2l
thread:370403
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20040724/msgs/371488.html