Posted by zoedak on April 9, 2004, at 21:07:26
In reply to Re: About the Supplement » Magee, posted by spoc on April 9, 2004, at 13:54:08
Hello-
I apologize for the confusion. I had been browsing this morning and posted before realizing how circuitous my route had become AND how outdated the post I was responding to was!
The original one the piqued my interest is referenced below (if I copied it corrctly)-however the previous link did take you to the original topic that brought me to the discussion of these supplements. Great detective work, BTWCheers-
zoedak
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20011213/msgs/87050.html> > >Dear Zoedak,
> > I am not sure what thread you are responding to? Read your with interest, but not a clue what it refers to.
> > Can you help?
> > Thanks
> > M
> -------
>
> Good afternoon Magee! Boy, I do have -- or take -- too much time to play here! Amongst its other functions, PB is a good babysitter/pacifier for me! Below is an example of how I see searching as a fun computer game! ;- )
>
> I was curious about the above too, and seeing that the thread this all got linked onto was begun in 2001, I assumed s/he was referring to another post(s) from possibly a long time ago. So I searched Babble/Google using the original thread title of "psychopharm consultation" (found by tracing the tree up from the all-inclusive list found under any particular post you're viewing); and added "supplement" or "supplements." The search returned several posts from a supplement twist this thread once took. Zoedak will probably see this and tell us which of these was being referred to, but in case you were looking forward to reading up on it right this minute:
>
> http://www.google.com/search?q=psychopharm-consultation+supplement+OR+supplements&sitesearch=dr-bob.org
>
poster:zoedak
thread:86991
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20040407/msgs/334709.html