Psycho-Babble Medication | about biological treatments | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: I did a quick search and it's true: » Ame Sans Vie

Posted by galkeepinon on August 30, 2003, at 2:20:45

In reply to Re: I did a quick search and it's true: » Janelle, posted by Ame Sans Vie on August 28, 2003, at 7:46:09

Michael!!! I totally agree here!!! It could be very possible that the r isomer was *not*, in fact, inactive!!! I am definately finding out that Lexapro IS about 10X more potent than Celexa with far fewer side effects!!!
Good point!


> I think I understand how this anomaly could be possible... Lexapro is s-citalopram; Celexa is s,r-citalopram. So could it be possible that the r isomer was *not*, in fact, inactive? More specifically, could it be that the r-isomer was in some way *inhibiting* the action of the s-isomer? If so, that would make complete sense, and that's the theory I think I'm going to subscribe to (for now anyway, until I find out for sure). It's just the only thing that seems to make sense -- I definitely found when I took Lexapro that it was about four times as potent as Celexa, with far fewer side effects (especially that horrible somnolence and apathy).


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Medication | Framed

poster:galkeepinon thread:253492
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20030828/msgs/255546.html