Psycho-Babble Medication | about biological treatments | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Anyone had success with ECT?

Posted by OldSchool on March 25, 2002, at 22:12:17

In reply to Re: Anyone had success with ECT? » OldSchool, posted by Elizabeth on March 25, 2002, at 14:43:45

> > It might be true that atypical depression doesnt respond as well to ECT.
>
> From what I've read, it's not totally clear to me whether there's solid evidence of this, or whether it's just a reputation. Interestingly, there doesn't seem to be any recent research on the subject at all. But anyway, these subtypes don't predict anything *absolutely*, so in some cases it's probably worthwhile to try ECT even if you seem to have "atypical" depression.

thats my plan. I dont know what type of depression I have at this stage anyway. I dont think any of my doctors do either. Its changed probably ten times thru the years. I personally think I have melancholic depression with some psychotic depression mixed in with it. So Im just gonna do the bilateral ECT thing. Ive also been told I have a retarded depression but with "mood reactivity" and a "rigid" personality. whatever that means.And Ive had atypical depression dx a few times. I also have the EPS symptoms now, mild parkinsons type symptoms, mild rigid right arm and stuff. Not noticeable to the naked eyeball unless I get examined though.

Frankly, I think the only thing anybody knows is Ihave some sortof mood disorder and thats about all. And some kind of mild movement disorder thats not severe.


>
> My pdoc and I did talk about ECT once (when I was in Boston), and he took the particular features of the illness (neurovegetative signs/symptoms, etc.) into consideration. This was when I'd tried a lot of things to augment Nardil (which had pooped out) and they didn't help. In the end we decided to keep trying with the medications. This ended up paying off, although it took a long time.
>
> I think that doctors in a place like Boston, where there's a major medical center (three, in fact) and lots of research going on, would probably be more likely to take subtypes of depression into account than the average community doctor. Boston doctors also seem to be into trying experimental medication approaches, rather than just trying you on an SSRI, TCA, MAOI, and lithium and then referring you for ECT. :-)
>

Is it really that much different in Boston? I realize its an elite academic town and all. But when it comes to psychiatry, which is so primitive about wherever you go, I find it hard to believe the psychiatric services there would be much different than in Winston, or Charlotte...or NYC..or wherever. Are there really experimental drugs there available for the taking? I realize people up there are probably more open minded than down here. But are there really more treatments up there?

> > You might know more about this than the docs do in some cases because of your readings.
>
> That's pretty scary, because I really don't know much about ECT. I definitely would not be willing to have ECT on the advice of a doctor who knew even less about it than I do.
>
> > You know how it is in the real world, if you dont respond to meds you just get shocked, period.
>
> Heh, my experience has that they just throw more meds at me!
>
> > As far as bilateral, its definitely better to start off with if you have psychotic features with your mood disorder.
>
> Hmm. It's been a long time since I seriously considered ECT, so I'm not sure that my information is up to date. My recollection is that it's a judgment call, though: you might want to start out using bilateral ECT for the most urgent cases, whereas if there isn't so much of a hurry you can afford to titrate so as to minimize the risk of cognitive side effects. Is there some other issue, or is that what you were thinking of?


Bilateral is just plain stronger and it doesnt require a titration procedure so the first treatment is not wasted like in unilateral. I figure I should just go for the gusto and go for bilateral and expect memory loss. At least Iknow it will be powerful.
>
> > Bifrontal ECT is supposed to be the best of both worlds, having effectiveness comparable to bilateral, but without the severe memory loss side effects of bilateral.
>
> I'm not very familiar with bifrontal ECT, but I'll keep this in mind (although I hope I never have to use the information myself!).

Bifrontal is supposed to have the effectiveness of bilateral, but without the memory loss side effects. Its the best of both worlds. The electrodes are placed above the eyes, on the forehead instead of the temples. Its making a comeback from what Ive read.

later,

Old School


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Medication | Framed

poster:OldSchool thread:97068
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20020322/msgs/100151.html