Posted by Else on August 1, 2001, at 7:05:45
In reply to Re: Q for JohnL: So...why's Prozac so different? » Else, posted by Kingfish on July 31, 2001, at 14:12:34
Sorry about the sarcasm John. But I have read the other posts. When you post information about research several times and then never give references well then, I believe that is not very credible. Pellmell asked a question about why Prozac was so different, a claim you have made several times and you have not only failed to answer to give a proper answer but have also proposed a very non-scientific explanation about neurotransmitters doing a bunch of things or something like that. You should not make claims that certain drugs are scientifically proven to work better in the REAL world if you cannot provide us with the studies refs the or at least the abstracts. Studies may be difficult to read but pretty much anyone can handle an abstract.
>
> > Well that DOES sound very convincing. All this stuff about STUFF. Research please...
> >
> >
>
> I usually hold my tongue, but I feel the sarcasm here is unwarranted. JohnL explained his lack of technical knowledge and requested it from others. Sometimes it is best to read all of the posts before adding your own. He is sharing his experience with Prozac, which Is personal research. Just my opinion.
>
> - K.
poster:Else
thread:72515
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20010731/msgs/72860.html