Posted by SUSAN on April 3, 2000, at 21:31:07
In reply to Re: Clicking the Amygdala?!?!?, posted by saint james on April 3, 2000, at 18:13:57
I'm with you on the proof thing. Neil is not!
If Neil Slade managed to get a vanity press title in print, it must be true,
at least in Neil Slade's eyes.THIS JUST IN....
ART BELL PROMISES TO RETIRE!!!www.artbell.com
Art Bell announced April 1 (?) that he will retire,
due to personal and family problems.Neil announced that he will be among Art's final guests,
appearing on Coast to Coast with Art Bell Thursday night and
Friday morning, April 5 and 6I hope someone with some qualifications, training in the sciences, and
knowledge of this subject area will auto-dial their way onto the show
and provide some balance to Neil's bizarre claims to be "completely
in keeping with what is accepted by neurology..."Neil gets away with this by claiming that no one has ever said anything
but good things about his self-styled neuroscience. This week offers a
prime opportunity to catch this guy in a nationwide debate and stop him
from further spreading his delussions and his preference for anti-logical
dialogue.Art's show might be available live on the Web, for anyone who does not
live in one of his many broadcast markets.Have at it.....
> > Of course such a claim requires proof, and scientific documentation:
> >
> > http://www.h2net.net/p/nslade/Papers/clicking.html
> >
>
> James here...
>
> This is just anchedotal info. Proof needs to be in the form of double blind studies or other studies using est. protocals from well excepted orgs. Extraordinary claims need extrordinary proof, and not a few quotes on a web page.
>
> james
poster:SUSAN
thread:28672
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20000401/msgs/28791.html