![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 71 to 95 of 95. Go back in thread:
Posted by Lou Pilder on December 30, 2008, at 21:49:36
In reply to Re: Lou's response to aspects-uaintpsein » Lou Pilder, posted by Sigismund on December 27, 2008, at 18:19:22
> >I like what Al Jolson said.
>
> What did Al Jolson say, Lou?we saw what he said. But here is what Chuck Berry said...
Lou
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suSMTy8PVqY
or
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCcNXBJs1HY
Posted by Lou Pilder on December 31, 2008, at 8:09:10
In reply to Re: Lou's response to aspects-uaintpsein » Sigismund, posted by Lou Pilder on December 30, 2008, at 21:49:36
> > >I like what Al Jolson said.
> >
> > What did Al Jolson say, Lou?
>
> we saw what he said. But here is what Chuck Berry said...
> Lou
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suSMTy8PVqY
> or
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCcNXBJs1HY
>
Here is what Bob said
Lou
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/yt-ced8o50G9kg/bob_dylan_blowin_in_the_wind/
Posted by Lou Pilder on January 4, 2009, at 20:29:07
In reply to Lou's response to aspects-what Bob said » Lou Pilder, posted by Lou Pilder on December 31, 2008, at 8:09:10
> > > >I like what Al Jolson said.
> > >
> > > What did Al Jolson say, Lou?
> >
> > we saw what he said. But here is what Chuck Berry said...
> > Lou
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suSMTy8PVqY
> > or
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCcNXBJs1HY
> >
> Here is what Bob said
> Lou
> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/yt-ced8o50G9kg/bob_dylan_blowin_in_the_wind/
>Here is what Dion said
Lou
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&VideoID=24912712
Posted by Sigismund on January 5, 2009, at 1:32:37
In reply to Let's hear from Dion, posted by Lou Pilder on January 4, 2009, at 20:29:07
but before we do, here is one from me.
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=LNafWbdriW0
Being good can be real as well.
All the best
Sig
Posted by Dr. Bob on January 6, 2009, at 2:10:59
In reply to Let's keep it administrative here » Lou Pilder, posted by Sigismund on January 5, 2009, at 1:32:37
> Let's keep it administrative here
Here's a link for other posts:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20081222/msgs/872464.html
Thanks,
Bob
Posted by Lou Pilder on January 13, 2009, at 9:54:41
In reply to Re: Lou's request for rationales-, posted by Dinah on December 29, 2008, at 13:34:52
> Dr. Bob is aware of the deputy action. If he wishes to revise it, he can.
>
> I wrote a reply to Dena. It apparently was not received by Dena. I don't know what happened. I resent it.You wrote,[...I resent it (a reply concerning a notification)...]
I am unsure as to if the reply has been recieved for I do not see a post from her that she has recived one. Could you forward your reply to her to me, if you do not have a confirmation that she has received it? If you could, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
Lou
Posted by Deputy Dinah on January 13, 2009, at 17:40:41
In reply to Lou's request for discovery-ptuprstp » Dinah, posted by Lou Pilder on January 13, 2009, at 9:54:41
We would not be allowed to send you someone else's mail.
Dinah, acting as deputy to Dr. Bob
Posted by Lou Pilder on January 13, 2009, at 19:57:35
In reply to Re: Lou's request for discovery-ptuprstp » Lou Pilder, posted by Deputy Dinah on January 13, 2009, at 17:40:41
> We would not be allowed to send you someone else's mail.
>
> Dinah, acting as deputy to Dr. BobIn this situation, the member's last post concerning this says that she has not received such. Could you send it to me if the member still contends that she has not received a reply if the member posts here that I have permission from her for you to do so?
Lou
Posted by Dinah on January 13, 2009, at 20:05:08
In reply to Lou's request for discovery of rulling » Deputy Dinah, posted by Lou Pilder on January 13, 2009, at 19:57:35
If you get Dr. Bob's permission, it's ok with me.
Posted by Dinah on January 13, 2009, at 20:09:01
In reply to Re: Lou's request for discovery of rulling » Lou Pilder, posted by Dinah on January 13, 2009, at 20:05:08
That is to say, it is not really up to me to decide.
Posted by Lou Pilder on January 14, 2009, at 8:33:06
In reply to Re: Lou's request for discovery of rulling, posted by Dinah on January 13, 2009, at 20:09:01
> That is to say, it is not really up to me to decide.
This is interesting. A member posts that a reply was not received for a notification and you post that you sent it and do not know why it has not been received. Mr. Hsiung has posted that one receiving a reply for a notification is [...to consider a reply to come from all of us...].
Being that what that could mean, if there is still not a confirmation from the member of receiving a reply concerning a notification, would any of the other deputies here be willing to send the notification to that member? Or, if the notification was sent only through, lets say, the bmail, could the email be tried if known or vice versa? If you could either do thhat or not, or something else,, then I could assess in some way the degree of willingness here for administrators.
Lou
Posted by Dena on January 17, 2009, at 1:11:46
In reply to Lou's request for discovery-ptuprstp » Dinah, posted by Lou Pilder on January 13, 2009, at 9:54:41
> > Dr. Bob is aware of the deputy action. If he wishes to revise it, he can.
> >
> > I wrote a reply to Dena. It apparently was not received by Dena. I don't know what happened. I resent it.
>
> You wrote,[...I resent it (a reply concerning a notification)...]
> I am unsure as to if the reply has been recieved for I do not see a post from her that she has recived one. Could you forward your reply to her to me, if you do not have a confirmation that she has received it? If you could, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
> Lou
Sorry for a delay here -- been off living life elsewhere.I have NOT received a reply.
I do receive notices about posts here on PB, and I receive babblemail ... but I haven't received a reply to my notification.
Just wanted to make that clear...
Shalom, Dena
Posted by Deputy 10derHeart on January 17, 2009, at 2:38:24
In reply to Re: Lou's request for discovery-ptuprstp, posted by Dena on January 17, 2009, at 1:11:46
> I have NOT received a reply.
>
> I do receive notices about posts here on PB, and I receive babblemail ... but I haven't received a reply to my notification.The replies Dinah sent - that any deputy sends - were by Babblemail. I saw a copy of the last one.
I'd guess 99% of the time this problem happens when messages are going into your spam/bulk folder, or you have changed your email address recently and no longer use the one you registered with on PB. If those things don't apply, we will have to alert Dr. Bob to check on some sort of technical glitch. It's baffling since you have recently been receiving Babblemail from other posters. Technology....grrr....
Posted by Dena on January 17, 2009, at 16:50:05
In reply to Non-receipt of replies » Dena, posted by Deputy 10derHeart on January 17, 2009, at 2:38:24
Well then, I fell into that elusive 1%.
I've not ever changed my email address; I've had the same one for 10 years. I'm on the computer every day, for many hours a day. I don't miss anything.
I check my spam folder several times a day (and have an automatic notification when anything enters my spam folder).
No response to my notification has come to me.
So: Try again?
Shalom, Dena
Posted by gardenergirl on January 17, 2009, at 19:11:37
In reply to Re: Non-receipt of replies, posted by Dena on January 17, 2009, at 16:50:05
Curious that someone would receive babblemails from others but not from a deputy replying to a notification. That would be a really, really odd and quite specific glitch.
gg
Posted by Deputy 10derHeart on January 17, 2009, at 20:16:48
In reply to Re: Non-receipt of replies, posted by Dena on January 17, 2009, at 16:50:05
Posted by Dena on January 18, 2009, at 1:01:30
In reply to Re: Non-receipt of replies, posted by gardenergirl on January 17, 2009, at 19:11:37
> Curious that someone would receive babblemails from others but not from a deputy replying to a notification. That would be a really, really odd and quite specific glitch.
>
> gg
That is my situation. Lest there be any doubt about my integrity, I do not lie.(not saying I'm being accused of lying -- just making it very clear)
Shalom, Dena
P.S. I did receive a copy of the response to my notification -- it came today. Thank you for your efforts to resend it.
Posted by Dena on January 18, 2009, at 1:09:31
In reply to Just sent another copy-did you get it? (nm) » Dena, posted by Deputy 10derHeart on January 17, 2009, at 20:16:48
Yes, I got it today - thank you.
Shalom, Dena
Posted by Dinah on January 18, 2009, at 7:57:21
In reply to Re: Non-receipt of replies, posted by Dena on January 18, 2009, at 1:01:30
Well, for the record, I hope my integrity is not doubted either. I'm not saying anyone is doubting it.
A copy of replies to notifications are sent to Administration. I did not get a copy of the original reply I sent you, and I thought maybe I hadn't checked the correct box. But when you said you hadn't got it either, I realized it might not have gone through properly and sent a second reply. A copy of the second reply was received by Administration, which is how 10der had it to forward to you. I'm glad she was able to do so.
Posted by Dena on January 18, 2009, at 13:03:07
In reply to Re: Non-receipt of replies » Dena, posted by Dinah on January 18, 2009, at 7:57:21
Thank you for checking and following through. Just in case it's not just my connection, you may want to check on why that glitch happened, twice.
(though you're likely already on it; didn't intend to nag or "be a mama")
Shalom, Dena
Posted by gardenergirl on January 18, 2009, at 13:22:46
In reply to Re: Non-receipt of replies » Dena, posted by Dinah on January 18, 2009, at 7:57:21
Posted by Dinah on January 18, 2009, at 14:21:02
In reply to Happy I'm not a cat. (nm), posted by gardenergirl on January 18, 2009, at 13:22:46
Posted by gardenergirl on January 18, 2009, at 15:19:36
In reply to ? (nm) » gardenergirl, posted by Dinah on January 18, 2009, at 14:21:02
Posted by Dinah on January 20, 2009, at 23:50:50
In reply to Curiosity and all... (nm) » Dinah, posted by gardenergirl on January 18, 2009, at 15:19:36
Slow-witted I am at times. :)
Posted by Lou Pilder on December 18, 2011, at 13:31:53
In reply to Lou, posted by Bobby on November 21, 2008, at 21:16:09
> You were the first person to offer me a kind word when I first came here to Babble--I haven't forgotten that gesture. You have been scrutinized and blocked more and longer than anyone I've seen here. It must be near unbearable to live under such a microscope --walking on eggshells. I'm sorry for the way things have evolved here for you Lou. I have not consciously tried to encourage the current state of affairs here. In fact, I try to stay as nuetral as possible on Admin. I sure do wish you could speak your mind here. I've never been offended by anything you've said---but the world suffers from a host of maladies and people are not as free to give their opinions here as once existed. Bob Dylan was right when he proclaimed that the times were changing. I reckon it's the natural progression when you have a bunch of folks who suffer from being human--it's an often untreatable condition. My hat's off to you Lou. You've endured a lot and have,so far, managed to maintain your composure. I suppose that I'm trying to say , "Hang in there" in my own round about way--and I have faith that you will. Later friend...
Bobby,
I am requesting for you to return to the forum here for there is a much more need by me now for me to ask for you to help me here. There is now the great potential IMHO for Jews to be victims of antisemitic violence as a result from that my requests and notifications to Mr. Hsiung and his deputy are outstanding, some for days, some for months, some for years. I think that there is the potentiial for some readers here to be indoctrinated, by the nature of that my requests to the admin are ouutstanding, to think that Jews are people that (redacted by respondent) to those that accept the claim that only (redatced by respondent) Jesus, which could IMHO foster antisemitic feelings as the statement is said to be OK by Mr. Hsiunng but my request to hinm as to if he thinks the statement is supportive is outstanding, and support take precedence as per Mr. Hsiung's TOS here. If you could go to the administration board and post in any of the threads from your perspective, I would apppreciate it.
Lou
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.