![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 14 of 14. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Lou Pilder on August 14, 2008, at 7:01:34
Mr. Hsiung and his deputies,
In accordance with the reminder procedure in relation to notifications that are outstanding, I sent a notification on August 11, 2008 that is outstanding.
Lou Pilder
Posted by Dr. Bob on August 15, 2008, at 2:05:58
In reply to Lou's request to the administration-owtsthan, posted by Lou Pilder on August 14, 2008, at 7:01:34
> I sent a notification on August 11, 2008 that is outstanding.
I think I did respond to that. If not, please notify us again. Thanks,
Bob
Posted by Lou Pilder on August 16, 2008, at 5:06:33
In reply to Re: Lou's request, posted by Dr. Bob on August 15, 2008, at 2:05:58
> > I sent a notification on August 11, 2008 that is outstanding.
>
> I think I did respond to that. If not, please notify us again. Thanks,
>
> BobMr. Hsiung,
You wrote,[...I think I did respond to that. If not, please sent it again...]
I have not received a reply from you nor do I see a post from the administration in the thread in question that addresses my concern in the notification.
I am unsure as to what you are wanting to mean here in regards to that this is an ongoing situation concerning other outstanding notifications from me where you have posted to me in another thread concerning another outstanding notification and emails,that if the notification is outstanding that [...we've {missed} it...] , and,[..I know that there are outstanding emails and I am no longer able to answer all emails...]
I am awaiting a reply from you concerning what you are wanting to mean by {missed}, for if I was to know what you are wanting to mean by that, then I could also know what you are wanting to mean by {we've} and then respond accordingly.
Also, in [...I know there are outstanding emails....I am no longer able to answer all emails...]. I am unsure as to what that could mean in relation to this ongoing situation involving other outstanding notifications and emails from me to you because now you have asked me to send the notification again if you have not responded to it, and would that sending again of a notification be like an email? So conceivably that you could not answer {all} emails, that could mean IMO that you could reply to 9999 out of 10,000 emails. If so, and assuming that you could reply to that, then could you reply to the outstanding emails that I have sent to you before you respond to me if I was to send the notification in question now again? If so, then I could know what you are wanting to mean by that you can not longer reply to all emails and respond accordingly.
If you could also take into consideration in any reply that you may post to me here that I have posted over and over that I will not submit to any additional terms or conditions as a member here in relation to the TOS here and that I will be glad to send the notification again if each deputy posted here that they have no record of the notification or any discussion of it and have no way to locate it. One member wrote here that it would be easier for me to send the notification again than for each deputy to either take the time to find it or post that they have no way to find the outstanding notification. My concern is not as to what is the easiest way, for if that was the case, would it not have been easier to pay the tax on the tea?
Lou Pilder
Posted by SLS on August 16, 2008, at 5:28:46
In reply to Lou's reply to Mr. Hsiung-rhoza » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou Pilder on August 16, 2008, at 5:06:33
Hi Lou.
For what it is worth, I don't find it counterproductive your changing the subject line in threads that you have started.
Please give some consideration to not changing the subject lines of ongoing threads so as to include your name. It is already part of the subject line.
- Scott
Posted by Deputy 10derHeart on August 16, 2008, at 20:23:55
In reply to Lou's reply to Mr. Hsiung-rhoza » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou Pilder on August 16, 2008, at 5:06:33
>I have not received a reply from you nor do I see a post from the administration in the thread in question that addresses my concern in the notification.
I sent you a Babblemail.
-- 10derHeart, acting as deputy to Dr. Bob
Posted by Lou Pilder on August 17, 2008, at 12:16:18
In reply to response to notification » Lou Pilder, posted by Deputy 10derHeart on August 16, 2008, at 20:23:55
Friends,
If you are considering posting a response in this thread, and would like to have further understanding concerning the issues involved,
I also think that you could have a better undertsanding of the issues here and any parallel issues that could possibly be related in other threads here by clicking on an offerd link here that takes you to a thread that has IMO many aspects in the posts being discussed that IMO have relevance to the discussions here.
If you would like the spacific links and statements in them without going through all the posts, you could email me if you like.
Posted by Lou Pilder on August 17, 2008, at 12:20:09
In reply to Lou's request to members-hrtfhutufollowrs?, posted by Lou Pilder on August 17, 2008, at 12:16:18
> Friends,
> If you are considering posting a response in this thread, and would like to have further understanding concerning the issues involved,
> I also think that you could have a better undertsanding of the issues here and any parallel issues that could possibly be related in other threads here by clicking on an offerd link here that takes you to a thread that has IMO many aspects in the posts being discussed that IMO have relevance to the discussions here.
> If you would like the spacific links and statements in them without going through all the posts, you could email me if you like.Friends,
Here is a link that takes you to a post in the thread.
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20060614/msgs/683360.html
Posted by Lou Pilder on August 17, 2008, at 12:24:48
In reply to link to the above that takes to thread, posted by Lou Pilder on August 17, 2008, at 12:20:09
> > Friends,
> > If you are considering posting a response in this thread, and would like to have further understanding concerning the issues involved,
> > I also think that you could have a better undertsanding of the issues here and any parallel issues that could possibly be related in other threads here by clicking on an offerd link here that takes you to a thread that has IMO many aspects in the posts being discussed that IMO have relevance to the discussions here.
> > If you would like the spacific links and statements in them without going through all the posts, you could email me if you like.
>
> Friends,
> Here is a link that takes you to a post in the thread.
> Lou
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20060614/msgs/683360.htmlFriends,
The corrected link:
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faith/20060614/msgs/683360.html
Posted by Zeba on August 18, 2008, at 11:41:55
In reply to *correctd* link to the above that takes to thread, posted by Lou Pilder on August 17, 2008, at 12:24:48
Lou
I did not read the threads you refer to as when I saw how old they were, I said to myself, these are too old to address now. I would think that if you take exception with something that old, it is likely too late to do anything about it. I think we all just have to be aware of insensitive or negative things from this point on.
I did not read the threads as when I saw how old they were, I said to myself, these are too old to address now.
Zeba
Posted by Lou Pilder on August 18, 2008, at 21:23:23
In reply to Re: *correctd* link to the above that takes to thread » Lou Pilder, posted by Zeba on August 18, 2008, at 11:41:55
> Lou
>
> I did not read the threads you refer to as when I saw how old they were, I said to myself, these are too old to address now. I would think that if you take exception with something that old, it is likely too late to do anything about it. I think we all just have to be aware of insensitive or negative things from this point on.
>
> I did not read the threads as when I saw how old they were, I said to myself, these are too old to address now.
>
> ZebaZeba,
You wrote,[...these are too old to address now...too late to do anything about it...from this point on...]
I am unsure as to what you are wanting to mean by the above. If you could clarify the following, then I could respond accordingly.
A.What criteria did you use to determine that the time period is too old to address now?
B. If there was a billboard that had a statement on it that was 4 years old that had the potential to arrouse ill-will toward a group of people,and a citizen requested to the mayor to have it taken down, what could be a reason, in your opinon, if there could be one, for the mayor to refuse to take it down?
C. If the mayor refused to take it down and then the citizen requested that the mayor attach a sign next to it that what is posted on the billboard is not in the best interest of the community and does not reflect the accepted attitutes of the charter for the city that are expected from it's citizens in relation that the charter prohibits the posting of statements of that nature, what in your opinion could be a reason, if there is one, for the mayor to refuse to post that next to the statement in question?
Lou
Posted by Zeba on August 19, 2008, at 0:51:25
In reply to Lou's reply to Zeba-ahdpop » Zeba, posted by Lou Pilder on August 18, 2008, at 21:23:23
I guess that if something was disturbing about a post or thread back in 2004, how come nothing was said then? This is what I do not understand.
Personally, I would think that if something is not objected to, that after a year it is too old. Is there something written this year that you find offensive or object to??
Zeba
Posted by Lou Pilder on August 19, 2008, at 6:05:11
In reply to Re: Lou's reply to Zeba-ahdpop » Lou Pilder, posted by Zeba on August 19, 2008, at 0:51:25
> I guess that if something was disturbing about a post or thread back in 2004, how come nothing was said then? This is what I do not understand.
>
> Personally, I would think that if something is not objected to, that after a year it is too old. Is there something written this year that you find offensive or object to??
>
> ZebaZeba,
You wrote,[...how come nothing was said then (in 2004)?...]
I am unsure as to what infomation you are using to post the above. If you could clarify the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
A. In,[...how come nothing was said (then)?...] what facts, if any, are you using to write [...how come nothing was said (then)...]?
B. If there was something said (then), what in your opinion could be a reason, if any, for the statements in question to still be allowed to stand?
Lou
Posted by Lou Pilder on August 19, 2008, at 16:54:00
In reply to Lou's reply to Zeba-tolldhastatut » Zeba, posted by Lou Pilder on August 19, 2008, at 6:05:11
> > I guess that if something was disturbing about a post or thread back in 2004, how come nothing was said then? This is what I do not understand.
> >
> > Personally, I would think that if something is not objected to, that after a year it is too old. Is there something written this year that you find offensive or object to??
> >
> > Zeba
>
> Zeba,
> You wrote,[...how come nothing was said then (in 2004)?...]
> I am unsure as to what infomation you are using to post the above. If you could clarify the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
> A. In,[...how come nothing was said (then)?...] what facts, if any, are you using to write [...how come nothing was said (then)...]?
> B. If there was something said (then), what in your opinion could be a reason, if any, for the statements in question to still be allowed to stand?
> LouZeba,
You wrote,[...I don't understand...?]
I think that one could have a better understanding of the issues here and in parallel threads here by examining a thread here. Here is a link to a post to the thread. If you could email me, I could point out the posts in question to save time if you like.
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faith/20080404/msgs/836274.html
Posted by Zeba on August 20, 2008, at 16:26:35
In reply to Lou's reply to Zeba-puhutduk?, posted by Lou Pilder on August 19, 2008, at 16:54:00
Lou,
I will go through my contacts at the University of Chicago, but as I said, it will take time. I understand you want things resolved ASAP, but it will take time. Dr. Bob has at the bottom of the page his email address that includes uchicago, and so it does not matter if the site is owned and operated separate from the University of Chicago. Their name appears on the babble sites.
Zeba
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.