![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 8 to 32 of 35. Go back in thread:
Posted by bleauberry on March 3, 2010, at 17:11:57
In reply to Another indictment of antidepressants..., posted by Bob on March 2, 2010, at 22:12:21
To followup on what SLS said, and I totally agree with what he said, there is even more.
Studies are very particular about who they choose. Been depressed before? Not eligible. Suicidal right now? Not eligible. Any other known health problems? Not eligible. Any past drug use? Not eligible.
Except for the few treatment resistant studies, the majority of clinical studies basically rule out the majority of realworld people. It is no wonder they get better results than the doctor does, and no wonder the doctor scratches his head wondering why he can't get the same results as clinical studies.
The clinical studies do not have the same sample of people that walk in and out of doctors' offices everywhere everyday. The samples are cherrypicked, which automatically right from the get-go makes the results biased and unreliable.
For sure better diagnostics are needed. I can't tell you how many stories, hundreds, I have seen of people who saw their longstanding depression vanish on things like: antibiotics, antifungals, chelation drugs, and even oddball things that would seem to have no relation, such as herbs like Burdock, Saw Palmetto, Coptis,...I mean, in all of these cases, there was a physical disease that was impacting the brain in such a way as to cause the feeling of depression. And in all of these cases there was not a diagnosis. There was a patient and/or a doctor that discovered the real problem by accident when treating for something else or treating something on a hunch.
Diagnostics aren't there. To rule common depression causes out, the best way is to challenge them with real blind trials of fairly safe and inexpensive protocols and see what happens.
Otherwise, we just stay sick and don't get better.
Posted by Phillipa on March 3, 2010, at 21:11:37
In reply to Re: Another indictment of antidepressants..., posted by europerep on March 3, 2010, at 14:47:21
I'm currently reading for the second time Listening To Prozac. Seems the doc Kramer is very attuned to his patients. He started off thinking psychotheraphy was it and now he's concerned with what he feels could be changing of personality from meds from what might not be normal for that person. Now the patients on insisting on continuing on the med as if they stop they go back to being who they were before and they don't like it. That's where at now so to be continued..... Phillipa
Posted by topcatclr on March 3, 2010, at 23:47:30
In reply to Re: Another indictment of antidepressants..., posted by bleauberry on March 3, 2010, at 17:11:57
Not again, how many times will we have these lame discussions. They ARE NOT PLACEBOS! They are very powerful, and for many people, very effective meds. The right patient with the right drug. An actual patient with an actual drug! God i am so sick of this topic It is very clear these meds are really only for the more severe problems. Doctors give them to people who really don't need them.That is why the results vary so much. Take your meds and try to enjoy life people! Obsessing about this here is half the problem. Cripes!
Posted by bulldog2 on March 4, 2010, at 8:12:29
In reply to Another indictment of antidepressants..., posted by Bob on March 2, 2010, at 22:12:21
> This time it's in JAMA.
>
> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=antidepressants-do-they-work-or-dont-theyThey just use the generic word antidepressant. What categories did they use? Did they use tcas,maois,snris and maois? Until I would know if all categories were used I would automatically discount the study.
Posted by CrAzYmEd on March 4, 2010, at 15:27:57
In reply to Re: Another indictment of antidepressants..., posted by topcatclr on March 3, 2010, at 23:47:30
> Not again, how many times will we have these lame discussions. They ARE NOT PLACEBOS! They are very powerful, and for many people, very effective meds. The right patient with the right drug. An actual patient with an actual drug! God i am so sick of this topic It is very clear these meds are really only for the more severe problems. Doctors give them to people who really don't need them.That is why the results vary so much. Take your meds and try to enjoy life people! Obsessing about this here is half the problem. Cripes!
SSRI's are far from powerfull and not much better then placebo, this is confirmed in several meta analysissen.
Augmentation strategies are the key, stahl's heroic combo's for example.
Trying SSRI's as monotherapy is useless.
Posted by SLS on March 4, 2010, at 15:39:55
In reply to Re: Another indictment of antidepressants..., posted by CrAzYmEd on March 4, 2010, at 15:27:57
> Trying SSRI's as monotherapy is useless.
Not for everyone. I have observed people in real life who have responded robustly to SSRI monotherapy. Seeing is believing. I must therefore question the validity of the meta-analyses you allude to.
- Scott
Posted by Justherself54 on March 4, 2010, at 18:32:06
In reply to Re: Another indictment of antidepressants... » CrAzYmEd, posted by SLS on March 4, 2010, at 15:39:55
I agree Scott..I used to respond robustly and had periods of great success on SSRI's..it's the damn poop-out and not working again the second go-round. I wish "they" could get that one figured out.
Posted by gman22 on March 4, 2010, at 19:18:37
In reply to Another indictment of antidepressants..., posted by Bob on March 2, 2010, at 22:12:21
SLS is correct. SSRI's can be very effective. I have seen paroxetine work wonders in some people, including myself. (I just choose a different treatment because of side effects). I have also seen them fail to work at high doses in some people. It just depends on the individual. I am glad that they are part of the overall arsenal of meds available.
Posted by Bob on March 4, 2010, at 19:23:05
In reply to Re: Another indictment of antidepressants..., posted by gman22 on March 4, 2010, at 19:18:37
> SLS is correct. SSRI's can be very effective. I have seen paroxetine work wonders in some people, including myself. (I just choose a different treatment because of side effects). I have also seen them fail to work at high doses in some people. It just depends on the individual. I am glad that they are part of the overall arsenal of meds available.
If you don't mind me asking, what was the other treatment you settled on when you didn't like the side effects of the SSRIs?
Posted by gman22 on March 4, 2010, at 23:09:15
In reply to Re: Another indictment of antidepressants... » gman22, posted by Bob on March 4, 2010, at 19:23:05
Low dose sertraline (25mg) with 50mg nortriptyline.
No side effects at all, with a very robust response.
Paxil worked very well but with the cost of weight gain, delayed orgasm and some lethargy (even at low doses of 10-20mg.)
Posted by topcatclr on March 5, 2010, at 0:13:26
In reply to Re Bob., posted by gman22 on March 4, 2010, at 23:09:15
SSRI's are far from powerfull and not much better then placebo, this is confirmed in several meta analysissen.
They COMPLETELY eliminate anxiety for me. For antidepressant relief i need an SNRI like Cymbalta. To say they are a "Placebo" is so funny it's barely worth a response! Your response is a "Placebo"!
Posted by Dr. Bob on March 6, 2010, at 9:01:16
In reply to Re: Re Bob., posted by topcatclr on March 5, 2010, at 0:13:26
Posted by bulldog2 on March 6, 2010, at 14:41:02
In reply to Another indictment of antidepressants..., posted by Bob on March 2, 2010, at 22:12:21
> This time it's in JAMA.
>
> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=antidepressants-do-they-work-or-dont-theyI think you could make this indictman of many categories of meds. The mind has a powerful power to stimulant the immune system and heal the body/mind. We go to the doctor for a sore thoat and we get an antibiotic and your sore throat goes away. The sore throat would probably have healed on its own.So the placebo effect is a real thing.
I was watching a program that showed medicine men healing people. The peopke believed in the rituals of the med man and than the power of the mind took over.
Obviously not every drug is just placebo effect but we can't discount the power of the mind to help heal us.
Posted by topcatclr on March 6, 2010, at 20:42:15
In reply to Re: Another indictment of antidepressants..., posted by bulldog2 on March 6, 2010, at 14:41:02
Since all of you believe these meds are placebos, i have no idea why there is a need to discuss them. After all they do nothing!
Posted by Lou Pilder on March 7, 2010, at 17:38:42
In reply to Re: Another indictment of antidepressants..., posted by topcatclr on March 6, 2010, at 20:42:15
> Since all of you believe these meds are placebos, i have no idea why there is a need to discuss them. After all they do nothing!
topcatclr,
You wrote,[...I have no idea why there is a need to discuss them (psychotropic drugs)
Here is a link to a video of a young lady that had taken psychotropic drugs prescribed to her.
I would like this video to be shown to people before they would take a prescribed psychotropic drug. You see, what you are going to see if you click on the link and also click on the other parts on the side, is what happened to me when I was given a prescribed psychotropic drug. The condition that you see can be unreversable. In my case, I was delivered from what you see by divine accomplishment.
Lou
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QTedhJOinE
Posted by Phillipa on March 7, 2010, at 20:00:48
In reply to Lou's response-nohoneighd? » topcatclr, posted by Lou Pilder on March 7, 2010, at 17:38:42
Lou what was the name of the psychotropic med? Phillipa
Posted by jedi on March 8, 2010, at 2:36:48
In reply to Lou's response-nohoneighd? » topcatclr, posted by Lou Pilder on March 7, 2010, at 17:38:42
Lou, the lady in the video, Mariana Pandolfi, has Parkison's disease. Are you saying you were cured of Parkinson's by divine accomplishment? Parkinson's disease is generally idiopathic and caused by loss of the production of dopamine in the brain. This disease is chronic and progressive. My uncle had early onset Parkinson's and I watched him die a slow and not so pretty death.
JediFrom Wikipedia-Motor symptoms of Parkinson's Disease:
Four symptoms are considered cardinal in PD: tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia and postural instability.[1]* Tremor normally has a frequency between 4 and 6 Hz (cycles per second) and is the most apparent and well-known symptom.[1] It is most commonly a rest tremor: maximal when the limb is at rest and disappearing with voluntary movement and sleep; it is a pronation-supination tremor that is described as "pill-rolling".[1] Tremor affects to a greater extent the most distal part of the extremity and is typically unilateral at onset.[1] Though around 30% of PD sufferers do not have tremor at disease onset most of them would develop it along the course of the disease.[1]
* Rigidity: defined as joint stiffness and increased muscle tone. In combination with a resting tremor, this produces a ratchety, "cogwheel rigidity" when the limb is passively moved.[1] It may be associated with joint pain, such pain being a frequent initial manifestation of the disease.[1]
* Bradykinesia and akinesia: the former refers to slowness of movement while the latter to the absence of it.[1] It is the most characteristic clinical feature of PD and it produces difficulties not only with the execution of a movement but also with its planning and initiation.[1] The performance of sequential and simultaneous movements is also hindered.[1] Rapid, repetitive movements produce a dysrhythmic and decremental loss of amplitude.
* Postural instability: failure of postural reflexes, along other disease related factors such as orthostatic hypotension or cognitive and sensory changes, which lead to impaired balance and falls.[1] It usually appears in the late stages of PD.[1]Other motor symptoms include:
* Gait and posture disturbances:
o Shuffling gait:[1] gait is characterized by short steps, with feet barely leaving the ground. Small obstacles tend to cause the patient to trip.
o Decreased arm-swing.[1]
o Turning "en bloc": rather than the usual twisting of the neck and trunk and pivoting on the toes, PD patients keep their neck and trunk rigid, requiring multiple small steps to accomplish a turn.
o Camptocormia:[1] stooped, forward-flexed posture. In severe forms, the head and upper shoulders may be bent at a right angle relative to the trunk.[2]
o Festination:[1] a combination of stooped posture, imbalance, and short steps. It leads to a gait that gets progressively faster and faster, often ending in a fall.
o Gait freezing: also called motor blocks, is a manifestation of akinesia.[1] Gait freezing is characterized by a sudden inability to move the lower extremities which usually lasts less than 10 seconds.[1] It may worsen in tight, cluttered spaces, when attempting to initiate gait or turning around, or when approaching a destination.[1] Freezing improves with treatment and also with behavioral techniques such as marching to command or following a given rhythm.[1]
o Dystonia:[1] abnormal, sustained, painful twisting muscle contractions, often affecting the foot and ankle (mainly toe flexion and foot inversion) which often interferes with gait.
o Scoliosis[1]
* Speech and swallowing disturbances.
o Hypophonia:[1] soft speech.
o Monotonic speech: Speech quality tends to be soft, hoarse, and monotonous.[1]
o Festinating speech: excessively rapid, soft, poorly-intelligible speech.
o Drooling: most likely caused by a weak, infrequent swallow.[1]
o Dysphagia: impaired ability to swallow; which in the case of PD is probably related to an inability to initiate the swallowing reflex or by a too long laryngeal or oesophageal movement.[1] Can lead to aspiration pneumonia.
o Dysarthria[1]
* Other motor symptoms:
o Fatigue
o Hypomimia:[1] a mask-like face
o Difficulty rolling in bed or rising from a seated position.[1]
o Micrographia:[1] small, cramped handwriting.
o Impaired fine motor dexterity and motor coordination.[1]
o Impaired gross motor coordination.
o Akathisia: an unpleasant desire to move.
o Reemergence of primitive reflexes.[1]
> You wrote,[...I have no idea why there is a need to discuss them (psychotropic drugs)
> Here is a link to a video of a young lady that had taken psychotropic drugs prescribed to her.
> I would like this video to be shown to people before they would take a prescribed psychotropic drug. You see, what you are going to see if you click on the link and also click on the other parts on the side, is what happened to me when I was given a prescribed psychotropic drug. The condition that you see can be unreversable. In my case, I was delivered from what you see by divine accomplishment.
> Lou
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QTedhJOinE
>
Posted by Lou Pilder on March 8, 2010, at 6:33:23
In reply to Re: Lou's response-nohoneighd? » Lou Pilder, posted by jedi on March 8, 2010, at 2:36:48
>
> Lou, the lady in the video, Mariana Pandolfi, has Parkison's disease. Are you saying you were cured of Parkinson's by divine accomplishment? Parkinson's disease is generally idiopathic and caused by loss of the production of dopamine in the brain. This disease is chronic and progressive. My uncle had early onset Parkinson's and I watched him die a slow and not so pretty death.
> Jedi
>
> From Wikipedia-Motor symptoms of Parkinson's Disease:
> Four symptoms are considered cardinal in PD: tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia and postural instability.[1]
>
> * Tremor normally has a frequency between 4 and 6 Hz (cycles per second) and is the most apparent and well-known symptom.[1] It is most commonly a rest tremor: maximal when the limb is at rest and disappearing with voluntary movement and sleep; it is a pronation-supination tremor that is described as "pill-rolling".[1] Tremor affects to a greater extent the most distal part of the extremity and is typically unilateral at onset.[1] Though around 30% of PD sufferers do not have tremor at disease onset most of them would develop it along the course of the disease.[1]
> * Rigidity: defined as joint stiffness and increased muscle tone. In combination with a resting tremor, this produces a ratchety, "cogwheel rigidity" when the limb is passively moved.[1] It may be associated with joint pain, such pain being a frequent initial manifestation of the disease.[1]
> * Bradykinesia and akinesia: the former refers to slowness of movement while the latter to the absence of it.[1] It is the most characteristic clinical feature of PD and it produces difficulties not only with the execution of a movement but also with its planning and initiation.[1] The performance of sequential and simultaneous movements is also hindered.[1] Rapid, repetitive movements produce a dysrhythmic and decremental loss of amplitude.
> * Postural instability: failure of postural reflexes, along other disease related factors such as orthostatic hypotension or cognitive and sensory changes, which lead to impaired balance and falls.[1] It usually appears in the late stages of PD.[1]
>
> Other motor symptoms include:
>
> * Gait and posture disturbances:
> o Shuffling gait:[1] gait is characterized by short steps, with feet barely leaving the ground. Small obstacles tend to cause the patient to trip.
> o Decreased arm-swing.[1]
> o Turning "en bloc": rather than the usual twisting of the neck and trunk and pivoting on the toes, PD patients keep their neck and trunk rigid, requiring multiple small steps to accomplish a turn.
> o Camptocormia:[1] stooped, forward-flexed posture. In severe forms, the head and upper shoulders may be bent at a right angle relative to the trunk.[2]
> o Festination:[1] a combination of stooped posture, imbalance, and short steps. It leads to a gait that gets progressively faster and faster, often ending in a fall.
> o Gait freezing: also called motor blocks, is a manifestation of akinesia.[1] Gait freezing is characterized by a sudden inability to move the lower extremities which usually lasts less than 10 seconds.[1] It may worsen in tight, cluttered spaces, when attempting to initiate gait or turning around, or when approaching a destination.[1] Freezing improves with treatment and also with behavioral techniques such as marching to command or following a given rhythm.[1]
> o Dystonia:[1] abnormal, sustained, painful twisting muscle contractions, often affecting the foot and ankle (mainly toe flexion and foot inversion) which often interferes with gait.
> o Scoliosis[1]
> * Speech and swallowing disturbances.
> o Hypophonia:[1] soft speech.
> o Monotonic speech: Speech quality tends to be soft, hoarse, and monotonous.[1]
> o Festinating speech: excessively rapid, soft, poorly-intelligible speech.
> o Drooling: most likely caused by a weak, infrequent swallow.[1]
> o Dysphagia: impaired ability to swallow; which in the case of PD is probably related to an inability to initiate the swallowing reflex or by a too long laryngeal or oesophageal movement.[1] Can lead to aspiration pneumonia.
> o Dysarthria[1]
> * Other motor symptoms:
> o Fatigue
> o Hypomimia:[1] a mask-like face
> o Difficulty rolling in bed or rising from a seated position.[1]
> o Micrographia:[1] small, cramped handwriting.
> o Impaired fine motor dexterity and motor coordination.[1]
> o Impaired gross motor coordination.
> o Akathisia: an unpleasant desire to move.
> o Reemergence of primitive reflexes.[1]
>
>
> > You wrote,[...I have no idea why there is a need to discuss them (psychotropic drugs)
> > Here is a link to a video of a young lady that had taken psychotropic drugs prescribed to her.
> > I would like this video to be shown to people before they would take a prescribed psychotropic drug. You see, what you are going to see if you click on the link and also click on the other parts on the side, is what happened to me when I was given a prescribed psychotropic drug. The condition that you see can be unreversable. In my case, I was delivered from what you see by divine accomplishment.
> > Lou
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QTedhJOinE
> >
> jedi,
You wrote,[...The lady in the video...Parkinson's disease...]
There is that neuroleptic drugs can induce Parkinson's disease. I would like for you to click on the link here in order for us to have further dialog here.Here is a link concerning neuroleptic drugs inducing that type of disorder. I would like for you to examine the citations at the end of the text and to look at the other parts of the video, I think parts 5-8, of the lady and see the comments that others made concerning that her condition could have been from taking neuroleptic drugs, prescribed.
Lou
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tardive_dyskinesia
>
Posted by jedi on March 8, 2010, at 12:01:40
In reply to Lou's reply--neuroleptic-induced » jedi, posted by Lou Pilder on March 8, 2010, at 6:33:23
Lou,
You are right in that neuroleptic medications can induce this type of movement disorder. Parkinson's Disease is usually idiopathic, and caused by a loss of dopamine in the brain. Parkinsonism can be caused by a stroke, encephalitis, meningitis, progressive supranuclear palsy, cortibosasal degeneration, certain antipsychotic and metoclopramide medications, toxins or head trauma. I googled the poor lady's name and could find no explanation of the cause of her parkonsonism symptoms. Maybe if someone wanted to dig deeper... Parkinson's disease is the most common cause of this type of parkinsonism. Did you see a citation, other than somebodies comment on the video, that her symptoms were caused by neuroleptic medications?I am glad that your symptoms were cured. This type of movement disorder is obviously very nasty to have to live with. And I do see your point in that antipsychotic medications can cause this type of movement disorder. These medications should be prescribed in as low a dosage and for as short a time as possible. However, I would not want to live with the symptoms of schizophrenia either.
Good Luck and Be Well,
Jedi
>
Posted by Phillipa on March 8, 2010, at 20:16:13
In reply to Re: Lou's reply--neuroleptic-induced » Lou Pilder, posted by jedi on March 8, 2010, at 12:01:40
Also the addition of a med such as cogentin will work with the antipsychotic to help prevent and even reverse. I've seen peoples jaws lock up and backs and with this med it disappears. Now this is early in the course of the med. Phillipa
Posted by topcatclr on March 8, 2010, at 23:26:08
In reply to Re: Lou's reply--neuroleptic-induced » Lou Pilder, posted by jedi on March 8, 2010, at 12:01:40
Been on meds most of my life. Would not be here without them. Many are like me and what may or may not have happened to you or anyone else has nothing to do with my decision to continue. Stop the scare mongering,
Posted by topcatclr on March 8, 2010, at 23:30:11
In reply to Re: Lou's reply--neuroleptic-induced, posted by topcatclr on March 8, 2010, at 23:26:08
It's also a good idea as a patient to know if you are reacting properly to a medication and act accordingly. I have not always responded properly to certain meds and have been able to change drugs without adverse affects. There is always risk, and i am aware of them and always listen to my body.
Posted by Lou Pilder on March 9, 2010, at 6:55:14
In reply to Re: Lou's reply--neuroleptic-induced, posted by topcatclr on March 8, 2010, at 23:26:08
> Been on meds most of my life. Would not be here without them. Many are like me and what may or may not have happened to you or anyone else has nothing to do with my decision to continue. Stop the scare mongering,
topcatclr,
You wrote,[...many are like me...Stop the xxxxx yyyyyyyy...].
I am unsure as to what you are wanting to mean by that. If you could post answers to the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
A. What are the criteria that you use to determine if something posted here qualifies to be in the catagory of {xxxxx yyyyyyyy}?
B. It is not my intention for you to change your position on taking the drugs here in question such as neuroleptic drugs, that could be catagorized as mind-altering drugs. But there are others that IMO could benifit from the knowlege available concerning what the consequences to the user of mind-altering drugs could be.
For instance, let's suppose that someone needed to go to San Jose. They go to an airport and they find a pilot that has a WWII fighter that runs but the pilot says to the person that there is a 65% chance that the plane will crash and you could be disabled for the rest of your life or even die. Now I do not know of anyone that would take that kind of risk, but maybe there are those that would if they had no other choice in order to get to San Jose.
Then the person sees a man on an old Harley and asks if he could drive him on the back of the cycle to San Jose. The man says that there is a 15% chance that he will crash and that the person could be thrown off and possibly be killed or disabled for life.
The the person sees that there is not a perfectly safe way to get to San Jose. But then a Rider on a White Horse appears. The person then says to the Rider, " Do you know the way to San Jose?"
Lou
Posted by Phillipa on March 9, 2010, at 20:08:42
In reply to Lou's reply--snhozay » topcatclr, posted by Lou Pilder on March 9, 2010, at 6:55:14
Whos the rider on the White Horse? Phillipa
Posted by topcatclr on March 9, 2010, at 23:20:53
In reply to Re: Lou's reply--snhozay » Lou Pilder, posted by Phillipa on March 9, 2010, at 20:08:42
Go away Lou.
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Medication | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.