Psycho-Babble Social Thread 983461

Shown: posts 1 to 25 of 35. This is the beginning of the thread.

 

is pleasant/but odd

Posted by floatingbridge on April 21, 2011, at 18:18:46

That's what my gp wrote as my psychiatric objective.

Besides normal mood and affect.

A copy of her report came bundled w/some records sent by my endo.

This really hurts my feelings. I really don't want to be odd.

What does this mean? This seems so silly, I know.

I guess I'll ask her next time I see her.

 

Re: is pleasant/but odd » floatingbridge

Posted by Phillipa on April 21, 2011, at 19:04:17

In reply to is pleasant/but odd, posted by floatingbridge on April 21, 2011, at 18:18:46

FB what did she send you? Phillipa

 

Re: is pleasant/but odd » floatingbridge

Posted by Dinah on April 22, 2011, at 7:12:11

In reply to is pleasant/but odd, posted by floatingbridge on April 21, 2011, at 18:18:46

I believe "odd" is part of my official diagnosis too. My therapist used it as part of why he thinks "schizotypal" fits me.

I've decided, most of the time at least, that odd isn't so bad. I think Tabitha once reframed it for me as "quirky", which sounds so much better. Somehow what she said stuck with me, and made me feel much better about it.

And, over time, I've come to notice that the people I'm most drawn to, the people who are most fun to be around, and most interesting, might be considered a bit odd by others. But differences *are* kind of interesting, like the gap in Lauren Hutton's teeth. How boring the world might be without a generous helping of quirky.

Now, if he described you as unpleasant and odd, that would be different.

 

Re: is pleasant/but odd » Dinah

Posted by floatingbridge on April 22, 2011, at 10:52:02

In reply to Re: is pleasant/but odd » floatingbridge, posted by Dinah on April 22, 2011, at 7:12:11

Thanks Dinah. I know it's a small thing, but I had never seen that written by a gp. Plus the cover FAX sheet originating from her office to the endo had MANY PSYCH ISSUES written in caps.

And just last week my pdoc and I spoke of social phobia :( Very bad timing, I suppose.

I love eccentrics. Many do, I imagine, because film and literature are peopled with odd folks.

I've never made my depression dx a secret from providers. They see the meds I might be on. I say early onset depression. I don't detail it for them like here. I am usually a smidge subdued with doctors.

But I keep thinking, "I thought she liked
me." Being liked is big. So is not being an outcast because my family of origin truly was odd/negative. Like, "hey freak!"

I feel, now, a bit insulted. I do need to talk to her about this.

Any suggestions? Usually the simpler and clearer the better.

 

Re: is pleasant/but odd » Phillipa

Posted by floatingbridge on April 22, 2011, at 11:29:46

In reply to Re: is pleasant/but odd » floatingbridge, posted by Phillipa on April 21, 2011, at 19:04:17

Phillipa, my endo sent me a bundle of my records for me to have to track my tsh levels. The gp's referral FAX happened to be part of the bundle.

I found the endo *pleasant*.

 

Re: is pleasant/but odd » floatingbridge

Posted by Dinah on April 22, 2011, at 11:53:08

In reply to Re: is pleasant/but odd » Dinah, posted by floatingbridge on April 22, 2011, at 10:52:02

Maybe it's just best to mention that you saw it and ask if she meant odd in a negative way? I don't think it necessarily means she doesn't like you. Odd isn't perhaps the best word to use, but the underlying meaning isn't necessarily negative.

I've never seen what my doctors write about me, and I'm relatively uncommunicative with them. Even so, nearly every doctor I've ever had has in some way asked if I'm in therapy, and seem greatly relieved when I say yes. It could be the list of meds, or it could be that I'm visibly tense around doctors.

I've chosen to find that amusing. :)

 

Re: is pleasant/but odd » Dinah

Posted by floatingbridge on April 22, 2011, at 12:07:16

In reply to Re: is pleasant/but odd » floatingbridge, posted by Dinah on April 22, 2011, at 11:53:08

Good advice.

I'm cooling down.

Next week I will use that wonderfully neutral word, notice.

 

Re: is pleasant/but odd » floatingbridge

Posted by sleepygirl2 on April 22, 2011, at 18:02:53

In reply to is pleasant/but odd, posted by floatingbridge on April 21, 2011, at 18:18:46

Well, I don't really enjoy people who aren't a little "odd".
Even doctors are a little weird about psych stuff.

If I could not mention the list of meds I am on I would. I decided that I won't if I think it couldn't possibly be a factor. I didn't tell the podiatrist for example. I won't tell my next dentist.

But for a gp, I guess they should know.
What I hope would never happen though, is to have what I say discounted in the least because of "psych issues".

I wish I could think of something to say.

 

Re: is pleasant/but odd » floatingbridge

Posted by sleepygirl2 on April 22, 2011, at 18:06:53

In reply to Re: is pleasant/but odd » Dinah, posted by floatingbridge on April 22, 2011, at 10:52:02

How about "I couldn't help but notice from my records that you very clearly wanted to communicate that my psychiatric issues were significant. Can you tell my why?"

 

Re: is pleasant/but odd » floatingbridge

Posted by Phillipa on April 22, 2011, at 19:56:58

In reply to Re: is pleasant/but odd » Phillipa, posted by floatingbridge on April 22, 2011, at 11:29:46

FB I don't find you odd. But as Dinah and Sleepygirl2 state I also like people who are different. Always have so if you are odd I am also. Phillipa

 

Re: is pleasant/but odd

Posted by floatingbridge on April 23, 2011, at 23:13:15

In reply to Re: is pleasant/but odd » floatingbridge, posted by sleepygirl2 on April 22, 2011, at 18:06:53

Yes, thank you. A good thought, methinks.

I spoke with a friend who is a massage therapist, and she was helpful for thinking from the doctor's side--overworked, pressured for time because of insurance. She thought the word choice could be better, that odd can be found offensive and is also pretty meaningless--therefore open to over-interpreted. And that maybe my doctor would benefit by knowing that.

By the time I see her next week, my blood pressure and paranoia should be stable :D

It is sooooo difficult being a human being worth being. For me.

I always wanted to draw. My proportion is awful; then I let wrong-headed perfectionism guide me, and I shut down. I love pencil drawings. Also ink.

I try to use color and texture since my graphics ability is not strong. My son loves drawing, and I stay out of his way, only quietly hanging a picture or squirrelling away favorites before they are demolished on the floor of his room.

Hope you are having at least one episide of hijinks this weekend. Or bike-riding.


> How about "I couldn't help but notice from my records that you very clearly wanted to communicate that my psychiatric issues were significant. Can you tell my why?"
>
>

 

Re: is pleasant/but odd

Posted by mtdewcmu on April 25, 2011, at 23:13:46

In reply to Re: is pleasant/but odd, posted by floatingbridge on April 23, 2011, at 23:13:15

I wouldn't necessarily take it as an insult. In your medical chart, the doctor is supposed to describe their interactions with you like a scientist would, and it's not supposed to be a place to make value judgments about your personality. So "odd" may just be a way of hinting at possible psychiatric issues, while not trying to diagnose them since psych is not her specialty. If she is really just airing her judgments of you in the chart, she is not acting like a good doctor.

 

Re: is pleasant/but odd » mtdewcmu

Posted by floatingbridge on April 26, 2011, at 10:16:09

In reply to Re: is pleasant/but odd, posted by mtdewcmu on April 25, 2011, at 23:13:46

Yes, MtDew, methinks you're right. The charge seems to have exhausted itself. I'll just ask her about it, as Dinah, sleepygirl and my rl friend suggested. The value of talking to people I care enough about has been pointed out to me, and it is a good act of stabilization and normalization for me. I become triggered soooo quickly. Luckily I don't see her until next week. Luckily, there are friends here at babble, too.

Thanks!

 

Re: is pleasant/but odd » floatingbridge

Posted by mtdewcmu on April 26, 2011, at 12:18:49

In reply to Re: is pleasant/but odd » mtdewcmu, posted by floatingbridge on April 26, 2011, at 10:16:09

At one point when I was taking classes at the local community college, I asked my then-pdoc to provide a record of my psych issues that I could give to the school, because I was struggling. One of the diagnoses listed was "hypochondriac." I have no clue where that came from, because I never said I lived in fear of a deadly disease. I can only think that since I described having so many psych problems, he thought I must be exaggerating. But hypochondria doesn't even make sense in that context. That really made me question what I was doing with him.

 

Re: is pleasant/but odd » mtdewcmu

Posted by floatingbridge on April 26, 2011, at 12:41:00

In reply to Re: is pleasant/but odd » floatingbridge, posted by mtdewcmu on April 26, 2011, at 12:18:49

Wow. I certainly would have felt bruised reading that. Ouch!

How very shallow and as you pointed out, inaccurate. Maybe anxiety? Being concerned over one's mental/physical health is absolutely different than deciding one has a terminal illness.

I'm thinking that it's such an blindspot. If someone is anxious, let's say, over psychological symptoms or mood issues or whatever, that these issues are expressed in our bodies as sensations to more or lesser extents. Anxiety isn't just thought habits. Our heads don't just sit
on top of our bodies. There can be endocrine issues. Or whatever. How long have I, in my case, just not felt *right*?

Hoo-boy. Sorry MtDew.

How frustrating to even present to a doctor. Then again, how frustrating to be a caring doctor.

 

Re: is pleasant/but odd » floatingbridge

Posted by mtdewcmu on April 26, 2011, at 22:02:09

In reply to Re: is pleasant/but odd » mtdewcmu, posted by floatingbridge on April 26, 2011, at 12:41:00

I didn't really let it bother me much at the time, because I figured that pdoc was from the bottom of the barrel. I saw him at a clinic that catered to low-income people receiving subsidies from the government. Not that a great, idealistic doctor could not have worked at such a clinic, but more often than not you get what you pay for.

 

Re: is pleasant/but odd

Posted by sigismund on April 27, 2011, at 13:37:20

In reply to Re: is pleasant/but odd » floatingbridge, posted by mtdewcmu on April 26, 2011, at 12:18:49

I once said the the psychiatrist who prescribed me methadone that I was going to start drinking green tea and taking supplements and attending to my health parametres and he told me 'That is disgusting. You are as healthy as a horse.'
Another doctor I really fumbled to tell what it was. I said 'I just don't feel right.' He paused before mounting and then said 'You are wallowing' etc etc and so on and so forth.

I can not recall a profession so given to rudeness and snap judgments. It must be the power.

 

Re: is pleasant/but odd » sigismund

Posted by mtdewcmu on April 27, 2011, at 22:32:24

In reply to Re: is pleasant/but odd, posted by sigismund on April 27, 2011, at 13:37:20

> I can not recall a profession so given to rudeness and snap judgments. It must be the power.

Who knows what drives somebody to become a psychiatrist. If you're, say, an endocrinologist, you can prescribe drugs rationally and watch the numbers go up or down, giving you objective feedback on your success or failure to treat the disease. Psychiatry is endless shades of gray. Economics is called the dismal science. Economics is not unlike psychiatry. My introductory economics professor in college claimed that the most rational way to distribute adopted children would be to sell them to the highest bidder. He claimed that it was only squeamishness that prevented us from doing what was optimal. You must have a screw loose if you can't see what would be the outcome of such a system. But I'm sure you would have a hard time convincing many economists.

 

Re: is pleasant/but odd » sigismund

Posted by floatingbridge on April 28, 2011, at 2:05:06

In reply to Re: is pleasant/but odd, posted by sigismund on April 27, 2011, at 13:37:20

Hi sigi :)

Ah, yes, wallowing. God forbid, not that that was what you were doing. Good for pigs, but some don't feel it carries over to humans. We just eat the pigs.

When I had a severe reaction during my c-section (like causing ptsd though I didn't know it then) the frickin surgeon, whom I had not had a grudge--I mean my son was healthy with an apgar of 9, laughed, yes laughed and waved her hand when I asked her about my experience of feeling like a trapped animal and panicking. I felt I knew the awful truth about how drugs could be used evilly to dismantle a person, that's how harrowing my reaction was. They had to knock me out.

I didn't tell her about my thoughts about cracking under torture--I have enough
sense. But she really laughed out loud (not lol) and said, "oh people imagine such silly things under surgery." I felt incredible umbrage. I realized right then that I hated her.

I didn't get the childbirth ptsd thing for
ummm, maybe five years. Wow. That's a whole babyhood. :(

 

Re: is pleasant/but odd

Posted by sigismund on April 28, 2011, at 2:35:24

In reply to Re: is pleasant/but odd » sigismund, posted by mtdewcmu on April 27, 2011, at 22:32:24

> My introductory economics professor in college claimed that the most rational way to distribute adopted children would be to sell them to the highest bidder. He claimed that it was only squeamishness that prevented us from doing what was optimal.

I suppose he was right. Thank God for squeamishness. This is from the same people who believe that the more choice you have the happier you are. "Voltaire's Bastards" may have been about this. I didn't feel right when I read it, so I'm not sure.

 

exception: some er doctors

Posted by floatingbridge on April 28, 2011, at 5:03:48

In reply to Re: is pleasant/but odd, posted by sigismund on April 28, 2011, at 2:35:24

So, after a brisk round trip to the local ER (all's well), I feel compelled to mention the excellent care we received by all the staff and the er doctor himself.

Maybe ER docs are of a different stripe?

 

Re: is pleasant/but odd » sigismund

Posted by mtdewcmu on April 28, 2011, at 12:19:47

In reply to Re: is pleasant/but odd, posted by sigismund on April 28, 2011, at 2:35:24

> > My introductory economics professor in college claimed that the most rational way to distribute adopted children would be to sell them to the highest bidder. He claimed that it was only squeamishness that prevented us from doing what was optimal.
>
> I suppose he was right. Thank God for squeamishness. This is from the same people who believe that the more choice you have the happier you are. "Voltaire's Bastards" may have been about this. I didn't feel right when I read it, so I'm not sure.

I read the two editorial reviews of that book. It looks like one where the pleasure of reading it comes more from the clever style (it's written by a novelist) than the clarity of the arguments. But I sort of went off on a tangent when I wrote that post, as my Dexedrine was winding down. Now that my Dexedrine is going strong, I remember a point I wanted to make.

If you think about the life trajectory that leads someone to graduate from medical school, and successfully complete a residency, there can't be much pain and failure involved. For the most part, you can't have gone through depression in college and nearly flunked out, and med school itself is a pressure cooker that drives some previously-sane people to become suicidal, so if you manage to get through it all, you must have had a pretty clean bill of mental health, and a pretty charmed life, all things considered. So mental anguish is something theoretical to them, and they're not going to be able to relate. So it shouldn't be altogether surprising when they make a comment that shows that they can't relate.

And then you add to that the peculiar nature of psychiatry as a specialty, where you have to sort of suspend disbelief that it's not a bunch of unscientific voodoo...

 

Re: is pleasant/but odd » floatingbridge

Posted by mtdewcmu on April 28, 2011, at 12:40:53

In reply to Re: is pleasant/but odd » sigismund, posted by floatingbridge on April 28, 2011, at 2:05:06

> When I had a severe reaction during my c-section (like causing ptsd though I didn't know it then) the frickin surgeon, whom I had not had a grudge--I mean my son was healthy with an apgar of 9, laughed, yes laughed and waved her hand when I asked her about my experience of feeling like a trapped animal and panicking. I felt I knew the awful truth about how drugs could be used evilly to dismantle a person, that's how harrowing my reaction was. They had to knock me out.
>
> I didn't tell her about my thoughts about cracking under torture--I have enough
> sense. But she really laughed out loud (not lol) and said, "oh people imagine such silly things under surgery." I felt incredible umbrage. I realized right then that I hated her.

That is interesting that you may have experienced PTSD from having a c-section. I witnessed a c-section in nursing school, but the book never mentioned PTSD as a complication. But I could totally see it as plausible, especially when added to post-partum depression/psychosis.

Doctors are a different breed. (See my other reply to sigismund.) But the surgeon was probably not the right person to talk to about your experience. She was probably thinking about what a good job she did sewing up your uterus, and didn't want to hear criticism about things outside her control. The anaesthesiologist might have taken it seriously, as it's more germane to their specialty. Being able to remain conscious during the procedure is considered a good thing, but it could very well carry a risk of PTSD.

I worked in a hospital for a few years on the nursing staff, and as much as I hate to say it, patients whose records carried a psychiatric diagnosis were always harder to work with. They tended to be moodier and responded to things differently than the average patient. They had trouble with things that most patients didn't, and they were difficult to please. You have to have some sympathy for the medical staff.

 

Re: exception: some er doctors » floatingbridge

Posted by mtdewcmu on April 28, 2011, at 12:44:19

In reply to exception: some er doctors, posted by floatingbridge on April 28, 2011, at 5:03:48

> So, after a brisk round trip to the local ER (all's well), I feel compelled to mention the excellent care we received by all the staff and the er doctor himself.
>
> Maybe ER docs are of a different stripe?

I'm glad you had a better experience there. I'm sure that ER doctors have a different mindset than surgeons. People don't become surgeons to deal with feelings, but defusing a crisis is part of emergency medicine.

 

Re: is pleasant/but odd » mtdewcmu

Posted by floatingbridge on April 28, 2011, at 13:33:27

In reply to Re: is pleasant/but odd » floatingbridge, posted by mtdewcmu on April 28, 2011, at 12:40:53

I wish I had been put under. I had no idea.

I do hear what your saying about context and the anesthetist. But could it have killed her to just be serious and say something like, well, yes that happens to some patients because of a reaction to anesthesia? Instead that I *imagined* it.

I was a milder little lambkin back then.


Go forward in thread:


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Social | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.