![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 12 of 12. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Deneb on August 19, 2010, at 19:51:58
I saw a man come on the bus. He had really wispy thin pants and I noticed his penis on his leg through his pants! I could see the shape very clearly! Ewwwww!
It was so weird and disgusting! I didn't know men's penises could go down one's leg!! I thought they were nicely contained in underwear! Ewwww! I'm so grossed out! Penises are disgusting! *Shudder*
Do men's penises just go everywhere under their pants?!? Ewwww!
It was way grosser than Speedos. It was so long! Ewww!
Posted by Deneb on August 19, 2010, at 20:10:28
In reply to Ewww! **Trigger**, posted by Deneb on August 19, 2010, at 19:51:58
Sorry I don't mean to say that penises are inherently disgusting, I don't want to make men feel put down. It was just that this particular man's penis was disgusting!
Posted by jensen on August 20, 2010, at 13:39:29
In reply to Ewww! **Trigger**, posted by Deneb on August 19, 2010, at 19:51:58
You saw WHAT on the bus??????? referring to your first sentence of your original. That act is generally not legal in a public place. Probably the remainder of the show wasn't either. Where I reside we have laws against lewd and lascivious behavior in public.
Posted by Deneb on August 20, 2010, at 15:27:16
In reply to Re:**Sexual referenceTrigger** » Deneb, posted by jensen on August 20, 2010, at 13:39:29
Oh he wasn't touching himself or anything. His penis was in his pants, but his pants were made of a really flimsy thin and skin clinging fabric. I saw the shape of his penis very clearly, even the shape of the tip! I could tell he was circumcised! It was way creepy! I wonder if the police would have apprehended him? Technically his penis was still under his pants.
I couldn't tell if he just had really bad fashion sense or if he was doing it on purpose.
Posted by Free on August 20, 2010, at 16:08:57
In reply to Ewww! **Trigger**, posted by Deneb on August 19, 2010, at 19:51:58
>
> Do men's penises just go everywhere under their pants?!? Ewwww!
>Unless they're very small, they travel with movement if not contained.
Much like women's breasts.
Posted by Phillipa on August 20, 2010, at 17:37:01
In reply to Re: Ewww! **Trigger** » Deneb, posted by Free on August 20, 2010, at 16:08:57
I would feel this would be considered the same as braless women or those whose nipples showed? Phillipa
Posted by Deneb on August 20, 2010, at 19:09:55
In reply to Re: Ewww! **Trigger**, posted by Phillipa on August 20, 2010, at 17:37:01
> I would feel this would be considered the same as braless women or those whose nipples showed? Phillipa
I don't. I think bra-less women are OK. It's only fair that women be allowed to go bare chested if men are allowed. I've seen men with bigger breasts than I have. Besides, breasts are for babies, not sex. I do feel it is inappropriate to show one's lower lady parts, just like it is for men, though I feel less disgust for women. LOL Camel toe is definitely not appropriate! Both men and women should keep their genitals well hidden!
Posted by sigismund on August 20, 2010, at 20:23:47
In reply to Ewww! **Trigger**, posted by Deneb on August 19, 2010, at 19:51:58
>Do men's penises just go everywhere under their pants?!? Ewwww!
This is an interesting question.
People who sold or made suits used to ask their customers 'Which side do you dress, Sir?', which always struck me as strange since I was either under-endowed or familiar only with the newer forms of underwear.
Posted by Phillipa on August 20, 2010, at 20:33:34
In reply to Re: Ewww! **Trigger**, posted by Deneb on August 20, 2010, at 19:09:55
Umm breasts are also for sex. Think of all the breast implants and lots of men are breast men. I know it's illegal here for women to be in public barechested unless a nudist colony in which case all genitals of both sexes would also be bared. Phillipa
Posted by Deneb on August 20, 2010, at 21:03:14
In reply to Re: Ewww! **Trigger** » Deneb, posted by Phillipa on August 20, 2010, at 20:33:34
I think the function of breasts as food for a baby trumps the sexual aspects of breasts. I haven't read anything much about feminism, but I'm pretty sure I am a feminist. All breast feeding women should be able to breast feed their babies whenever and wherever they are. I strongly believe this.
I also think women and men should be treated equally and yes that means no women first in emergencies.
Posted by Phillipa on August 20, 2010, at 21:07:14
In reply to Re: Ewww! **Trigger** » Phillipa, posted by Deneb on August 20, 2010, at 21:03:14
They serve both purposes. But That's the law nudity. Now in Europe I know women can be topless and some carribean islands. Other places as well I'm pretty sure. Hey why not post a thread on what breasts are viewed as and their purpose. Phillipa
Posted by muffled on August 29, 2010, at 13:07:44
In reply to Ewww! **Trigger**, posted by Deneb on August 19, 2010, at 19:51:58
ROFL!!!! Thats too gross!
I once saw a guy in bike pants and no kidding, I am SURE it was a cucumber he had in there, cuz it was the wrong shape!!!
You can bet your butt he was doing it on purpose.
Best thing is to look at him very clearly, and LAFF!!!!
Or make a very blatant negative comment in his direction.
Stuff like that scares people and is not fair.
Think of some things you might have said or done, and if it happens again, SAY IT! Like as not there are others who feel the same as you in the vicinity.
Just the way you wrote it is funny Deneb. You are such a sweetie.
TC
Ones
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Social | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.