![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 13 of 13. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Lou Pilder on February 6, 2005, at 5:26:24
Dr. Hsiung,
I am requesting that you write a determination as to the acceptability or not in relation to the past practice here for the following.
The poster wrote, [....violate...].
Lou Pilder
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050128/msgs/453795.html
Posted by Lou Pilder on February 6, 2005, at 6:39:08
In reply to Lou's request to Dr. Hsiung-pstprcviolt, posted by Lou Pilder on February 6, 2005, at 5:26:24
DR. Hsiung,
An example of the past practice in relation to my request to you for a determination of acceptability of the post on question
Lou Pilder
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040927/msgs/395693.html
Posted by gardenergirl on February 6, 2005, at 17:23:47
In reply to Lou's request to Dr. Hsiung-pstprcviolt, posted by Lou Pilder on February 6, 2005, at 5:26:24
Lou,
There is something I have always been curious about, and since you are using one of my posts for administrative review, I'd like to ask you. I'm going to "borrow" your posting style, if that is okay with you, in hopes it is helpful to you in reading this.When you submit something for review, such as in this case, I wonder if it is
1)because you are hurt or offended by it?
2)Or do you do it as a way to increase consistency in how the rules are enforced and applied?
3)Or is there some other purpose?If it is number 1, I apologize. I did not intend for my interpretation of the rule as I did to in any way reflect on you or your postings. I was just answering your question in a general way.
If it is 2 or 3, I am curious about what your hopes are in regards to the forum.
Thanks in advance for you reply,
gg
Posted by Lou Pilder on February 6, 2005, at 18:40:03
In reply to Re: Lou's request to Dr. Hsiung-pstprcviolt » Lou Pilder, posted by gardenergirl on February 6, 2005, at 17:23:47
gg,
You wrote,[...in this case, are you hurt or offended by it?...]?
No, I am not hurt or offended by your use of the word.
Lou
Posted by alexandra_k on February 6, 2005, at 18:53:54
In reply to Re: Lou's request to Dr. Hsiung-pstprcviolt » Lou Pilder, posted by gardenergirl on February 6, 2005, at 17:23:47
Would you like to elaborate on 2 or 3 Lou?
Posted by Lou Pilder on February 6, 2005, at 19:19:40
In reply to Re: Lou's request to Dr. Hsiung-pstprcviolt » Lou Pilder, posted by gardenergirl on February 6, 2005, at 17:23:47
alexandra_k,
You wrote,[...comment on 2 or 3?...].
You saw my citation of the past practice here? If so, that could mean that #2 could be relevant but #3 could be also.
Lou
Posted by alexandra_k on February 6, 2005, at 20:41:29
In reply to Lou's reply to alexandra_k-2or3 » gardenergirl, posted by Lou Pilder on February 6, 2005, at 19:19:40
Posted by Dr. Bob on February 8, 2005, at 9:19:36
In reply to Lou's request to Dr. Hsiung-pstprcviolt, posted by Lou Pilder on February 6, 2005, at 5:26:24
> I am requesting that you write a determination as to the acceptability or not in relation to the past practice here for the following...
I think it's acceptable. I think the main difference is that it's hypothetical?
Bob
--
> what you suggested seems to me to be a clever way to try to get around the rule. That is the part that seems to me to violate the spirit.
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050128/msgs/453795.html
> the administrative board is the place to request the administration to make a determination on posts that could be deemed to violate the civility code here.
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040927/msgs/395693.html
Posted by Lou Pilder on February 8, 2005, at 14:24:44
In reply to Re: Lou's request, posted by Dr. Bob on February 8, 2005, at 9:19:36
> > I am requesting that you write a determination as to the acceptability or not in relation to the past practice here for the following...
>
> I think it's acceptable. I think the main difference is that it's hypothetical?
>
> Bob
>
> --
>
> > what you suggested seems to me to be a clever way to try to get around the rule. That is the part that seems to me to violate the spirit.
>
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050128/msgs/453795.html
>
> > the administrative board is the place to request the administration to make a determination on posts that could be deemed to violate the civility code here.
>
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040927/msgs/395693.htmlDr Hsiung,
You wrote,[...the difference is that it is hypothetical?...].
Well, is your question mark here an idication that you really do not know why one is acceptable and one is not?
Lou
Posted by Lou Pilder on February 8, 2005, at 15:24:22
In reply to Re: Lou's request, posted by Dr. Bob on February 8, 2005, at 9:19:36
> > I am requesting that you write a determination as to the acceptability or not in relation to the past practice here for the following...
>
> I think it's acceptable. I think the main difference is that it's hypothetical?
>
> Bob
>
> --
>
> > what you suggested seems to me to be a clever way to try to get around the rule. That is the part that seems to me to violate the spirit.
>
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050128/msgs/453795.html
>
> > the administrative board is the place to request the administration to make a determination on posts that could be deemed to violate the civility code here.
>
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040927/msgs/395693.htmlDr. Hsiung
Let us look at some posts in regards to the past practice concerning your writing to me about my writing the word,"violate".
If you examine them, could you write why they are acceptable in regards to comparison with my use of the word?
Lou Pilder
http://www.dr-bob.oeg/babble/admin/20050128/msgs/454883.html
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20030404/msgs/216698.html
Http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050128/msgs/451374.html
Posted by Lou Pilder on February 8, 2005, at 15:30:21
In reply to Lou's reply to Dr. Hsiung's reply to Lou-pstprc » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou Pilder on February 8, 2005, at 15:24:22
> > > I am requesting that you write a determination as to the acceptability or not in relation to the past practice here for the following...
> >
> > I think it's acceptable. I think the main difference is that it's hypothetical?
> >
> > Bob
> >
> > --
> >
> > > what you suggested seems to me to be a clever way to try to get around the rule. That is the part that seems to me to violate the spirit.
> >
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050128/msgs/453795.html
> >
> > > the administrative board is the place to request the administration to make a determination on posts that could be deemed to violate the civility code here.
> >
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040927/msgs/395693.html
>
> Dr. Hsiung
> Let us look at some posts in regards to the past practice concerning your writing to me about my writing the word,"violate".
> If you examine them, could you write why they are acceptable in regards to comparison with my use of the word?
> Lou Pilder
> http://www.dr-bob.oeg/babble/admin/20050128/msgs/454883.html
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20030404/msgs/216698.html
> Http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050128/msgs/451374.htmlCorrection to the link:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050128/msgs/454883.html
Posted by 64bowtie on February 8, 2005, at 15:54:23
In reply to Re: Lou's request to Dr. Hsiung-pstprcviolt » Lou Pilder, posted by gardenergirl on February 6, 2005, at 17:23:47
GG
<<< I tried to get to some point of awareness where "this poster" made sense as they posted on this and that topic. Your questions are so much more clarifying for me than anything I've posted on my own! Humbly, I'm certain its been my problem all along!
> Lou,
> There is something I have always been curious about, and since you are using one of my posts for administrative review, I'd like to ask you. I'm going to "borrow" your posting style, if that is okay with you, in hopes it is helpful to you in reading this.
>
> When you submit something for review, such as in this case, I wonder if it is
> 1)because you are hurt or offended by it?
> 2)Or do you do it as a way to increase consistency in how the rules are enforced and applied?
> 3)Or is there some other purpose?
>
> If it is number 1, I apologize. I did not intend for my interpretation of the rule as I did to in any way reflect on you or your postings. I was just answering your question in a general way.
>
> If it is 2 or 3, I am curious about what your hopes are in regards to the forum.
>
> Thanks in advance for you reply,
> gg<<< Again, thank you from the bottom of my "crazy-mixed-up-little-old-fuel-pump"(heart)!!!
Rod
Posted by gardenergirl on February 8, 2005, at 16:20:19
In reply to Thank you » (((GG))) »... you make it so clear..., posted by 64bowtie on February 8, 2005, at 15:54:23
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.