![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 35 to 59 of 90. Go back in thread:
Posted by Lamdage22 on January 15, 2016, at 7:47:04
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-the objective, posted by Escapee on January 14, 2016, at 20:51:34
> Loo paper,whats ur diagnosis other than being a complete TW*T? No dr bob? This is great! Hey loo paper, stop routing around womens public toilettes for use tampons! Try sticking a tampon up ur own *ss and smeĺl and lick that instead.
> Well what other choices do u have? Oh, my friend just said,"ur a c*nt"Come on... thats too much of the good.
Posted by Lou Pilder on January 15, 2016, at 13:18:36
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-the objective » Lou Pilder, posted by Phillipa on January 14, 2016, at 20:00:41
> Lou pay attention babble is gone and no one is going to ban anyone. The death O meter got babble not the posters. Poor babble. Phillipa
Phillipa,
You wrote,[...babble is gone...the death-O-meter got babble...Poor babble...].
What you have posted about me could induce hostile and disagreeable opinions and feelings about me and decrease the respect and confidence and regard in which I am held. This is all because it is false that babble is gone and false that the death-O-meter got babble. And worse, that could induce into vulnerable minds {scapegoating} as me being the target person to be the {false} cause of babble being gone that your post could lead others to think.
And worse, more people could be killed by the drugs from reading here as they could be swayed to ignore my warnings and not ask me to use my death-O-meter to help them understand how close to their lives being shortened that they could be from the drugs promoted here as "medicines".
And even worse, Mr. Hsiung allows you to post this against me here all the while telling readers that he has a vision that sometime in the future everything that he does, or doesn't do, will be good for his community as a whole, even allowing defamation against me here contradicting his own rules all along leading readers to think that by him allowing hate to be seen as civil, that it will be good for his community as a whole as he thinks and to trust him at that.
The hate is plainly visible directed at me , the Jewish person here, that is prohibited by Mr. Hsiung to post the foundation of Judaism as revealed to me and all along allowing the foundation of anti-Semitism to be seen as being supportive where those types of posts are originally posted. That makes his policy against the Jew, which is the definition of what anti-Semitism is, which makes his policy an anti-Semitic policy by that definition. The concept of doing what will be good for the whole is an old backward vision used to justify slavery and infanticide and segregation and genocide buried in the execution of war criminals decades ago. Yet today, Mr. Hsiung still clings to him being justified to have posters defame me here on the grounds of his vision that he says allows the hate because by him allowing the hate, it will be good for this community that he says he will have in its whole. But that means that my life does not matter to him, for the harm that he admits could come to me from the defamation and anti-Semitism allowed to be seen as supportive by him and any deputy of record here to be allowed by them to be seen as being supportive, is justified in his mind because it will be good for his community as a whole.
His absence here to allow the hate directed at me here is nothing new, but an old tactic used to allow the killing of Jews by the leaders turning a blind eye to mass murder allowing the sick-minded people in the community to take advantage of what has been called a pogrom using Jews as an outlet for their sadism.
Lou
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47TVObUr6GY
Posted by SLS on January 15, 2016, at 15:28:37
In reply to ., posted by SLS on January 14, 2016, at 23:05:20
Dear People,
This is a medication board.
This was a medication thread.
This ugliness is what has driven people away from Psycho-Babble over the years.
Perhaps we can wrap up this flame-war and completely ignore provocative posters.
This being an unmoderated forum, it is incumbent upon us as individuals to keep it relevant.
Please.
- Scott
Posted by Lou Pilder on January 15, 2016, at 16:26:52
In reply to MAOI dosage, posted by SLS on January 15, 2016, at 15:28:37
> Dear People,
>
> This is a medication board.
>
> This was a medication thread.
>
> This ugliness is what has driven people away from Psycho-Babble over the years.
>
> Perhaps we can wrap up this flame-war and completely ignore provocative posters.
>
> This being an unmoderated forum, it is incumbent upon us as individuals to keep it relevant.
>
> Please.
>
>
> - ScottScott,
You wrote,[...This being an unmoderated forum...].
I do not think so. This is all because Mr. Hsiung states that he does what will be good in *his thinking* for the community as a whole. Because he says that he does this {in his thinking}, then unless he is in a state that he can not think, what is being done is according to his thinking that will be good for his community as a whole. This could mean that the {unmoderation} is really a type of moderation to allow what can be seen. What can be seen is that defamation against me and anti-Semitic propaganda is being allowed to be seen as supportive by the fact that Mr. Hsiung states that support takes precedence. This can be proven by the fact that there is defamation after defamation and anti-Semitic propaganda hurled at me here all with impunity from Mr. Hsiung's enforcement policy. If Mr. Hsiung's thinking is impaired so that he could not moderate in his thinking, I think that someone could have posted such and supplied someone in his place.
Lou
Posted by Phillipa on January 15, 2016, at 19:51:47
In reply to Lou's response-a tactic to allow? » SLS, posted by Lou Pilder on January 15, 2016, at 16:26:52
What a great idea who should be brought in? Any great ideas? Phillipa
Posted by Phillipa on January 15, 2016, at 19:56:08
In reply to Lou's response-a tactic to allow? » SLS, posted by Lou Pilder on January 15, 2016, at 16:26:52
See you have a facebook account retired U of Cincinnati. So retired teacher what subject did you teach? Phillipa
Posted by Escapee on January 15, 2016, at 21:06:22
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-the objective, posted by Escapee on January 14, 2016, at 20:51:34
> Loo paper,whats ur diagnosis other than being a complete TW*T? No dr bob? This is great! Hey loo paper, stop routing around womens public toilettes for use tampons! Try sticking a tampon up ur own *ss and smeĺl and lick that instead.
> Well what other choices do u have? Oh, my friend just said,"ur a c*nt"WOW i actually got away with that! Was just a test (and a laugh) to see how 'wild' this site has become. So, is Dr Bob dead or something?? Very strange. I guessing he left no post? He used to have a really good site running. Saved my skin a few times in the past. What happened? Where is he? Is anyone aware if he had any mental health issues of his own?
Escapee
Posted by Phillipa on January 15, 2016, at 21:13:17
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-the objective, posted by Escapee on January 15, 2016, at 21:06:22
No only thing I know is he a few years back had a facebook site. But don't know if does anymore. I would like to know who is paying for this site. Maybe amazon since google searchbar is amazon? Your guess is as good as mine. Phillipa
Posted by Escapee on January 15, 2016, at 21:21:27
In reply to Lou's reply-pogrom » Phillipa, posted by Lou Pilder on January 15, 2016, at 13:18:36
Jews? What do they have to do with the board or issue? If i get as bitter as u if i manage to go on into old age i hope someone shoots me in the head.
Posted by Lou Pilder on January 15, 2016, at 21:23:39
In reply to Lou's reply-pogrom » Phillipa, posted by Lou Pilder on January 15, 2016, at 13:18:36
Friends,
I apologize for posting the link in the post that I am responding to here. You may already know that when I post links I do not post the whole link but a way for you to actuate it yourself by following directions so that the link is not directly to the text. I forgot to do that this time.
Lou
Posted by Escapee on January 15, 2016, at 21:35:02
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-the objective » Escapee, posted by Phillipa on January 15, 2016, at 21:13:17
> No only thing I know is he a few years back had a facebook site. But don't know if does anymore. I would like to know who is paying for this site. Maybe amazon since google searchbar is amazon? Your guess is as good as mine. Phillipa
I like u Phillipa. You are always sweet in what you say/ask. I 1st used this site in 2002 and u were already here.
Posted by SLS on January 15, 2016, at 22:34:03
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-the objective » Phillipa, posted by Escapee on January 15, 2016, at 21:35:02
How very unproductive.
- Scott
Posted by SLS on January 15, 2016, at 22:35:11
In reply to Scott's narcissistic hijacking of a subject line. » Escapee, posted by SLS on January 15, 2016, at 22:34:03
> How very unproductive.
>
>
> - ScottHow very unproductive.
- Scott
Posted by SLS on January 15, 2016, at 22:35:46
In reply to Re: Scott's narcissistic hijacking of a subject line., posted by SLS on January 15, 2016, at 22:35:11
> > How very unproductive.
> >
> >
> > - Scott
>
> How very unproductive.
>
>
> - ScottHow very unproductive.
- Scott
Posted by SLS on January 15, 2016, at 22:38:54
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-the objective » Escapee, posted by Phillipa on January 15, 2016, at 21:13:17
How very unproductive.
- Scott
Posted by SLS on January 15, 2016, at 22:44:11
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-pogrom » Lou Pilder, posted by Escapee on January 15, 2016, at 21:21:27
This was your thread, but not anymore.
You do understand this, right?
If you don't give a damn, neither do I.
See ya'.
- Scott
Posted by SLS on January 15, 2016, at 22:46:40
In reply to Scott's narcissistic hijacking of a subject line. » Escapee, posted by SLS on January 15, 2016, at 22:44:11
> This was your thread, but not anymore.
>
> You do understand this, right?
>
> If you don't give a damn, neither do I.
>
> See ya'.
>
>
> - ScottGee, maybe I should give a damn.
- Scott
Posted by SLS on January 15, 2016, at 22:47:34
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-the objective » Escapee, posted by Phillipa on January 15, 2016, at 21:13:17
Thanks.
- Scott
Posted by SLS on January 15, 2016, at 22:56:48
In reply to Scott's narcissistic hijacking of a subject line., posted by SLS on January 15, 2016, at 22:47:34
My apologies.
- Scott
Posted by SLS on January 15, 2016, at 22:59:31
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-the objective » Escapee, posted by Phillipa on January 15, 2016, at 21:13:17
It's a choice.
- Scott
Posted by SLS on January 15, 2016, at 23:02:24
In reply to Scott's narcissistic hijacking of a subject line. » Phillipa, posted by SLS on January 15, 2016, at 22:59:31
Obviously, I do give a damn.
But no longer along this thread.
- Scott
Posted by Lou Pilder on January 16, 2016, at 8:16:45
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-pogrom » Lou Pilder, posted by Escapee on January 15, 2016, at 21:21:27
>
>
> Jews? What do they have to do with the board or issue? If i get as bitter as u if i manage to go on into old age i hope someone shoots me in the head.
>
Es,
You wrote,[...Jews? What do they have to do with this board or issue?...].
The site is administrated by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record. If the administration of the site is against the Jews, then the administration of the site is anti-Semitic as being against the Jews by the understanding of the definition of anti-Semitism and how anti-Semitism is created and developed in a community, workplace, school, university and such. If the administration can control the content to be against the Jew, then it is an anti-Semitic site by definition. This is done by discriminating against the Jew so that hostility toward the Jews is seen as being supportive and in Mr. Hsiungs community, he says that by him allowing anti-Semitic hate to stand as being seen as supportive by him, that it will be good in his thinking for his community as a whole. That echoes the mantra of European Fascism that was buried in the execution of war criminals decades ago that led to millions of Jewish children being murdered and millions of adults also. There ashes were scattered in the wind. They can not speak here, I will speak for them.
Here is one of the first posts that Mr. Hsiung changed his own declaration to allow the poster to be immune from his enforcement rule in his TOS. This allowed hatred toward the Jews to flourish here as being seen as being supportive.
[admin, 428781 ]
That dehumanized Jews here and then the escalation of ant-Semitism being seen as being supportive here took off. The tragic consequences to Jews that could come from this site by seeing a psychiatrist go out of his way to allow anti-Semitic hate to be posted with impunity turns my stomach. I will continue to try to stop him and his deputies of record from allowing anti-Semitic hate to be allowed to be seen as being supportive by them. Your post against me here being allowed shows how not only Mr. Hsiung devalues Jews, but also shows that the members apathy in relation to them not trying to stop you from posting defamation against me here, can stoke the furnace of hate to go to homes all over the world that could arouse hatred toward the Jews coming from this site.
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140304/msgs/1068672.html
Posted by Phillipa on January 16, 2016, at 10:04:59
In reply to Re: Scott's narcissistic hijacking of a subject line., posted by SLS on January 15, 2016, at 23:02:24
I understand Scott. Just got caught up in it. Phillipa
Posted by SLS on January 16, 2016, at 10:27:10
In reply to Re: Scott's narcissistic hijacking of a subject line. » SLS, posted by Phillipa on January 16, 2016, at 10:04:59
> I understand Scott. Just got caught up in it. Phillipa
Thank, Phillipa.
I would like to recover as many previously regular posters as possible and not discourage new ones from joining the community.
Do you have any suggestions on how we might accomplish these goals?
- Scott
Posted by 10derheart on January 16, 2016, at 12:44:09
In reply to no one to ban you. offend away! (nm) » Escapee, posted by 10derheart on January 14, 2016, at 17:40:12
Your post is pretty disgusting...and sexist... and I HATE the "ist" cluture of finding racism, sexism, and every other ism everywhere. But this is blatant.
I don't call people d*cks or other male-specific terms. Do you have to use the filthiest slang for female body parts to express yourself?
Makes me less likely to take you seriously.
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Medication | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.