![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 4 to 28 of 28. Go back in thread:
Posted by Athene on October 14, 2014, at 19:45:39
In reply to Re: Lou's response/request-izwhtitiz, posted by Lamdage22 on October 6, 2014, at 14:25:31
> If you find yourself in that realm, this post could save your life, for people in withdrawal that do not know what it is, can think that their mind has been altered forever by the drug and that they could never return and be like they are without end so that suicide seems to be an attractive alternative to living in that state."
>
> There is no need to be in this realm because you can withdraw without being in this "realm" which i (and a couple of doctors) call PSYCHOSIS. In psychosis, a lot of things can happen (in some people). Not in controlled withdrawal.
> This psychosis wouldn't be there if the person was healthy enough and the discontinuation was slow enough.
>
> And this i find irresponsible that you describe this realm, which means psychosis, as a potential path toward health.
>I think there is another option. While withdrawing bit by bit, working to heal the emotional distress that comes up - in bite-sized chunks due to the slow withdrawal. Often drugs will suppress our feelings, so coming off of them will cause a return of the original feelings. This could end in a state considered outright psychosis, or depersonalization, panic, insomnia, etc., which is not desirable. People need help staying healthy as they withdraw, so they don't end up falling off the cliff. Because for many of us, that just leads back to the hospital and higher doses.
Posted by Lamdage22 on October 14, 2014, at 19:45:40
In reply to Re: Lou's response/request-izwhtitiz » Lamdage22, posted by Athene on October 6, 2014, at 14:33:56
Lou
what is the difference between a vision and psychosis?
Posted by Lou Pilder on October 14, 2014, at 19:45:40
In reply to Re: Lou's response/request-izwhtitiz, posted by Lamdage22 on October 6, 2014, at 14:29:40
> It has been revealed to me as I stood on the Mountaintop and looked down at humanity to see two roads. And on one road there were many running to and fro on a very wide road. And I saw the end of the road as death.
>
> So, you had a vision?
L,
What I am posting about here is a {revelation}. This is different from a {vision}
Lou
Posted by 10derheart on October 14, 2014, at 19:45:40
In reply to Lou's response/request-izwhtitiz » Lamdage22, posted by Lou Pilder on October 6, 2014, at 13:39:51
...and this bus always makes return trips if we wait long enough.
Posted by Phil on October 14, 2014, at 19:45:40
In reply to wheels on the bus..., posted by 10derheart on October 7, 2014, at 1:00:28
:(
Posted by Lou Pilder on October 14, 2014, at 19:45:41
In reply to Re: Lou's response/request-izwhtitiz, posted by Lamdage22 on October 6, 2014, at 14:25:31
> It has been revealed to me as I stood on the Mountaintop and looked down at humanity to see two roads. And on one road there were many running to and fro on a very wide road. And I saw the end of the road as death.
>
> I respect your feelings, but in my opinion everyone is going to die. Evidence strongly supports this view as can be seen on any graveyard.
>
> > If you want to post the link to one of the posts that you say says what you say it says, then I could have the opportunity to post my response to you.
>
> "I have read your predicament here and you could commit suicide or mass-murder in the condition that you are in as a result of the drugs inducing akathisia, as many doctors recognize."
>
> Doctors recognize all kinds of things. We all have candida, i have candida, we all have toxoplasmosis. The world is sickened by candida and toxoplasmosis. Well, i don't and i have wasted money for this sh*t. What doctor recognized what? Quote?
>
> I object to the opinion that mass murder can be brought on by akathisia. Excuse me, but it strikes me as pretty ridiculous.
>
>
> And if you do not want to take this opportunity to post a link to one of those, then let readers know that what you posted about me is what it is.
> > Lou
>
> "There could be a realm that you could find yourself in. This realm could be frightening if you do not know what it is. The realm starts in a few days after you stop the drug. Sometimes the realm starts later than that. This could be from stopping the drug You can call it withdrawal, you can call it discontinuation syndrome, but whatever you call it, if you do not know what it is, you could kill yourself and/or others.
> If you find yourself in that realm, this post could save your life, for people in withdrawal that do not know what it is, can think that their mind has been altered forever by the drug and that they could never return and be like they are without end so that suicide seems to be an attractive alternative to living in that state."
>
> There is no need to be in this realm because you can withdraw without being in this "realm" which i (and a couple of doctors) call PSYCHOSIS. In psychosis, a lot of things can happen (in some people). Not in controlled withdrawal.
> This psychosis wouldn't be there if the person was healthy enough and the discontinuation was slow enough.
>
> And this i find irresponsible that you describe this realm, which means psychosis, as a potential path toward health.
>
> L,
You wrote,[..what doctor recognized..?].
Here is a video with another doctor's recognition.
Lou
To see this video;
A Pull up Google
B Type in:
[ feoLOs121bQ ]>
>
Posted by Lou Pilder on October 14, 2014, at 19:45:41
In reply to Lou's reply-psychiatric drugs and mass murder » Lamdage22, posted by Lou Pilder on October 7, 2014, at 7:09:39
> > It has been revealed to me as I stood on the Mountaintop and looked down at humanity to see two roads. And on one road there were many running to and fro on a very wide road. And I saw the end of the road as death.
> >
> > I respect your feelings, but in my opinion everyone is going to die. Evidence strongly supports this view as can be seen on any graveyard.
> >
> > > If you want to post the link to one of the posts that you say says what you say it says, then I could have the opportunity to post my response to you.
> >
> > "I have read your predicament here and you could commit suicide or mass-murder in the condition that you are in as a result of the drugs inducing akathisia, as many doctors recognize."
> >
> > Doctors recognize all kinds of things. We all have candida, i have candida, we all have toxoplasmosis. The world is sickened by candida and toxoplasmosis. Well, i don't and i have wasted money for this sh*t. What doctor recognized what? Quote?
> >
> > I object to the opinion that mass murder can be brought on by akathisia. Excuse me, but it strikes me as pretty ridiculous.
> >
> >
> > And if you do not want to take this opportunity to post a link to one of those, then let readers know that what you posted about me is what it is.
> > > Lou
> >
> > "There could be a realm that you could find yourself in. This realm could be frightening if you do not know what it is. The realm starts in a few days after you stop the drug. Sometimes the realm starts later than that. This could be from stopping the drug You can call it withdrawal, you can call it discontinuation syndrome, but whatever you call it, if you do not know what it is, you could kill yourself and/or others.
> > If you find yourself in that realm, this post could save your life, for people in withdrawal that do not know what it is, can think that their mind has been altered forever by the drug and that they could never return and be like they are without end so that suicide seems to be an attractive alternative to living in that state."
> >
> > There is no need to be in this realm because you can withdraw without being in this "realm" which i (and a couple of doctors) call PSYCHOSIS. In psychosis, a lot of things can happen (in some people). Not in controlled withdrawal.
> > This psychosis wouldn't be there if the person was healthy enough and the discontinuation was slow enough.
> >
> > And this i find irresponsible that you describe this realm, which means psychosis, as a potential path toward health.
> >
> > L,
> You wrote,[..what doctor recognized..?].
> Here is a video with another doctor's recognition.
> Lou
> To see this video;
> A Pull up Google
> B Type in:
> [ feoLOs121bQ ]
>
> > L,
And another video with doctors testifying
Lou
To see this video, pull up Google and type in the following. Then you will see 4 videos to choose from. The first one.
[ youtube, PL98EE8BBB6FAFC14A ]
remember that the letters are case sensitive and after the "C", that is the number 14
> >
>
>
Posted by Lamdage22 on October 14, 2014, at 19:45:41
In reply to Lou's reply-psychiatric drugs and mass murder-B, posted by Lou Pilder on October 7, 2014, at 7:48:08
Lou,
How do you differentiate a revelation from a psychotic experience?
Just because you find evidence on the internet for your claims, doesn't make them more real. You find evidence for virtually every claim a human could ever make on the internet. No matter how unlikely or ridiculous.
Yes, psychiatric drugs sometimes, even often are involved in school shootings and they likely are a contributing factor in some of these cases. But i would argue that most of these people must have been very resentful, or mad, before they received treatment, it just didn't come to the surface.
I have had what you would call a revelation as well, and it is false by all rational evidence. I do not wish to go into detail. Let me just say that acting according to this revelation was disastrous. Also, me acting according to your revelation was even more disastrous.
Furthermore, some people would argue that there are no supernatural forces in this universe, neither inside nor outside of human beings. These people would see any vision, revelation or any other type of spiritual/religious experience as a delusion.
Others would argue that not every experience perceived as a revelation is in fact a revelation. Humans are predisposed to error.
And although you stand ontop of a mountain and look down on all of us, it doesn't mean that you are an exception.I am offended that you think of us so lowly, that each and every one of us is a potential killer, because we are not. Maybe you should come down from your mountain back to earth.
I am open for discussion, but i insist that these terrible things happen (mostly) because of humans. It is humans choice to continue to take a medication that makes them hostile, isnt it? And isnt it also their choice to act on that hostility rather than to seek help?
Posted by Lamdage22 on October 14, 2014, at 19:45:42
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-psychiatric drugs and mass murder-B, posted by Lamdage22 on October 7, 2014, at 12:15:52
I am sorry, this second last one is more cruel than i intended to be.
Please ignore.I argue that medication, if anything, is just one of many factors that ultimately lead to such crimes. Certain medication, certain reactions to medication, in certain people with certain circumstances.
Also, the easy access to guns, violence in the media and the tendency of society to bring forth losers.
That would be a more rational approach.
If you want do be taken seriously, you need to back down just a little bit.
Posted by Phil on October 14, 2014, at 19:45:42
In reply to Lou's reply-psychiatric drugs and mass murder » Lamdage22, posted by Lou Pilder on October 7, 2014, at 7:09:39
Almost every near suicide by people that have been revealed to me attempted suicide because they did not take their meds. If you can't take my word for it look up video's by Kay Redfield Jamison. She's a scientist, not a scaremonger. Didn't want to take her Lithium when young and she was minutes from death in her suicide attempt. That story has been told over and over and over by suicide survivors.
Look at what our food supply has in it and did you realize, Lou, that they are full of carcinogens and neurotoxins? Everyone eats last time I checked. Eat apples? Peaches? Celery?
Worse yet a chemical to eradicate weeds and bugs in crops includes agent orange. It is approved. Would you want a young child raised on that crap? We are trying to help ourselves here while mega corporations are trying to kill us. In other words Lou, you should be addressing food, not sick people trying their level best to get well in a world of haters. We may well be worse for eating an apple.
http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/healthy-home/3274/cfs-healthy-home/tips-for-a-healthy-home/3526/top-5-pesticide-laden-fruits-and-vegetablesNumber of deaths for leading causes of death
Heart disease: 596,577
Cancer: 576,691
Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 142,943
Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 128,932
Accidents (unintentional injuries): 126,438
Alzheimer's disease: 84,974
Diabetes: 73,831
Influenza and Pneumonia: 53,826
Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 45,591
Intentional self-harm (suicide): 39,518
source: cdc.govSuicides are epidemic in every country in the world and the leading cause of death worldwide for mid-teens.(i.e. no meds in many countries)
Rural Chinese women drink pesticides to kill themselves in record numbers. They do not have access to psychiatric care.
Posted by Lou Pilder on October 14, 2014, at 19:45:43
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-psychiatric drugs and mass murder-B, posted by Lamdage22 on October 7, 2014, at 12:15:52
> Lou,
>
> How do you differentiate a revelation from a psychotic experience?
>
> Just because you find evidence on the internet for your claims, doesn't make them more real. You find evidence for virtually every claim a human could ever make on the internet. No matter how unlikely or ridiculous.
>
> Yes, psychiatric drugs sometimes, even often are involved in school shootings and they likely are a contributing factor in some of these cases. But i would argue that most of these people must have been very resentful, or mad, before they received treatment, it just didn't come to the surface.
>
> I have had what you would call a revelation as well, and it is false by all rational evidence. I do not wish to go into detail. Let me just say that acting according to this revelation was disastrous. Also, me acting according to your revelation was even more disastrous.
>
> Furthermore, some people would argue that there are no supernatural forces in this universe, neither inside nor outside of human beings. These people would see any vision, revelation or any other type of spiritual/religious experience as a delusion.
>
> Others would argue that not every experience perceived as a revelation is in fact a revelation. Humans are predisposed to error.
> And although you stand ontop of a mountain and look down on all of us, it doesn't mean that you are an exception.
>
> I am offended that you think of us so lowly, that each and every one of us is a potential killer, because we are not. Maybe you should come down from your mountain back to earth.
>
> I am open for discussion, but i insist that these terrible things happen (mostly) because of humans. It is humans choice to continue to take a medication that makes them hostile, isnt it? And isnt it also their choice to act on that hostility rather than to seek help?
>
L,
You wrote about a subset of people that consider those that receive revelation in a spiritual sense to be delusional
I ask:
Are those people atheists?
Lou
Posted by Lou Pilder on October 14, 2014, at 19:45:43
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-psychiatric drugs and mass murder, posted by Phil on October 7, 2014, at 15:35:05
> Almost every near suicide by people that have been revealed to me attempted suicide because they did not take their meds. If you can't take my word for it look up video's by Kay Redfield Jamison. She's a scientist, not a scaremonger. Didn't want to take her Lithium when young and she was minutes from death in her suicide attempt. That story has been told over and over and over by suicide survivors.
>
> Look at what our food supply has in it and did you realize, Lou, that they are full of carcinogens and neurotoxins? Everyone eats last time I checked. Eat apples? Peaches? Celery?
> Worse yet a chemical to eradicate weeds and bugs in crops includes agent orange. It is approved. Would you want a young child raised on that crap? We are trying to help ourselves here while mega corporations are trying to kill us. In other words Lou, you should be addressing food, not sick people trying their level best to get well in a world of haters. We may well be worse for eating an apple.
> http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/healthy-home/3274/cfs-healthy-home/tips-for-a-healthy-home/3526/top-5-pesticide-laden-fruits-and-vegetables
>
> Number of deaths for leading causes of death
>
> Heart disease: 596,577
> Cancer: 576,691
> Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 142,943
> Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 128,932
> Accidents (unintentional injuries): 126,438
> Alzheimer's disease: 84,974
> Diabetes: 73,831
> Influenza and Pneumonia: 53,826
> Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 45,591
> Intentional self-harm (suicide): 39,518
> source: cdc.gov
>
> Suicides are epidemic in every country in the world and the leading cause of death worldwide for mid-teens.(i.e. no meds in many countries)
> Rural Chinese women drink pesticides to kill themselves in record numbers. They do not have access to psychiatric care.P,
You wrote something like that I ****** address food, not...].
I ask:
Instead of posting here, I have big tobacco to address first? (millions die world-wide each year from tobacco)
Lou
Lou
Posted by Phillipa on October 14, 2014, at 19:45:43
In reply to Lou's reply-I'dwlkehymyal » Phil, posted by Lou Pilder on October 7, 2014, at 20:02:44
Car accidents, falls, illnesses medical, soon it will be Ebola? What next? P
Posted by Lamdage22 on October 14, 2014, at 19:45:44
In reply to Lou's reply-lytandrk » Lamdage22, posted by Lou Pilder on October 7, 2014, at 19:56:49
> > Lou,
> >
> > How do you differentiate a revelation from a psychotic experience?
> >
> > Just because you find evidence on the internet for your claims, doesn't make them more real. You find evidence for virtually every claim a human could ever make on the internet. No matter how unlikely or ridiculous.
> >
> > Yes, psychiatric drugs sometimes, even often are involved in school shootings and they likely are a contributing factor in some of these cases. But i would argue that most of these people must have been very resentful, or mad, before they received treatment, it just didn't come to the surface.
> >
> > I have had what you would call a revelation as well, and it is false by all rational evidence. I do not wish to go into detail. Let me just say that acting according to this revelation was disastrous. Also, me acting according to your revelation was even more disastrous.
> >
> > Furthermore, some people would argue that there are no supernatural forces in this universe, neither inside nor outside of human beings. These people would see any vision, revelation or any other type of spiritual/religious experience as a delusion.
> >
> > Others would argue that not every experience perceived as a revelation is in fact a revelation. Humans are predisposed to error.
> > And although you stand ontop of a mountain and look down on all of us, it doesn't mean that you are an exception.
> >
> > I am offended that you think of us so lowly, that each and every one of us is a potential killer, because we are not. Maybe you should come down from your mountain back to earth.
> >
> > I am open for discussion, but i insist that these terrible things happen (mostly) because of humans. It is humans choice to continue to take a medication that makes them hostile, isnt it? And isnt it also their choice to act on that hostility rather than to seek help?
> >
> L,
> You wrote about a subset of people that consider those that receive revelation in a spiritual sense to be delusional
> I ask:
> Are those people atheists?
> Lou
>Yes.
Posted by Lou Pilder on October 14, 2014, at 19:45:44
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-lytandrk, posted by Lamdage22 on October 8, 2014, at 8:15:58
> > > Lou,
> > >
> > > How do you differentiate a revelation from a psychotic experience?
> > >
> > > Just because you find evidence on the internet for your claims, doesn't make them more real. You find evidence for virtually every claim a human could ever make on the internet. No matter how unlikely or ridiculous.
> > >
> > > Yes, psychiatric drugs sometimes, even often are involved in school shootings and they likely are a contributing factor in some of these cases. But i would argue that most of these people must have been very resentful, or mad, before they received treatment, it just didn't come to the surface.
> > >
> > > I have had what you would call a revelation as well, and it is false by all rational evidence. I do not wish to go into detail. Let me just say that acting according to this revelation was disastrous. Also, me acting according to your revelation was even more disastrous.
> > >
> > > Furthermore, some people would argue that there are no supernatural forces in this universe, neither inside nor outside of human beings. These people would see any vision, revelation or any other type of spiritual/religious experience as a delusion.
> > >
> > > Others would argue that not every experience perceived as a revelation is in fact a revelation. Humans are predisposed to error.
> > > And although you stand ontop of a mountain and look down on all of us, it doesn't mean that you are an exception.
> > >
> > > I am offended that you think of us so lowly, that each and every one of us is a potential killer, because we are not. Maybe you should come down from your mountain back to earth.
> > >
> > > I am open for discussion, but i insist that these terrible things happen (mostly) because of humans. It is humans choice to continue to take a medication that makes them hostile, isnt it? And isnt it also their choice to act on that hostility rather than to seek help?
> > >
> > L,
> > You wrote about a subset of people that consider those that receive revelation in a spiritual sense to be delusional
> > I ask:
> > Are those people atheists?
> > Lou
> >
>
> Yes.
>
L,
You wrote,[...it is human(')s choice to continue to take a medication that makes them hostile, isn't it?...].
Would it be their choice if they were addicted to the drug that makes them hostile?
Lou
Posted by Lamdage22 on October 14, 2014, at 19:45:44
In reply to Lou's reply-addiction » Lamdage22, posted by Lou Pilder on October 8, 2014, at 9:39:36
> You wrote,[...it is human(')s choice to continue to take a medication that makes them hostile, isn't it?...].
> Would it be their choice if they were addicted to the drug that makes them hostile?
> LouI think the answer to this question is no simple yes/no thing. I would say attenuated.
I think its not right to talk like this about ALL drugs. The drugs that (mostly) cause addiction seldom cause hostility.
And im not sure if the meds that can cause hostility also are addictive.If you could be more specific, i could give a specific answer.
Posted by Lamdage22 on October 14, 2014, at 19:45:45
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-addiction, posted by Lamdage22 on October 8, 2014, at 13:28:55
Lou, what do you think they are addicted to then, if the drug makes them hostile?
I thought people take drugs to fee euphoric and at peace and that this feeling is addicting. How can hostility be addicting?
Posted by Lamdage22 on October 14, 2014, at 19:45:45
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-addiction, posted by Lamdage22 on October 8, 2014, at 15:09:38
I have been what you would call addicted to Nardil.
Stopped because of psychosis and hostility in certain situations.I haven't stopped earlier, because for a while, the medication was helping tremendously.
Can you be addicted to the concept of a good life? Would you really call this addiction? Because it implies that there is anything wrong with it.
I would call addiction everything that is trying to replace a good life. Alcohol, gambling and so on. Because that is negative.
Posted by Lou Pilder on October 14, 2014, at 19:45:46
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-addiction, posted by Lamdage22 on October 8, 2014, at 13:28:55
> > You wrote,[...it is human(')s choice to continue to take a medication that makes them hostile, isn't it?...].
> > Would it be their choice if they were addicted to the drug that makes them hostile?
> > Lou
>
> I think the answer to this question is no simple yes/no thing. I would say attenuated.
> I think its not right to talk like this about ALL drugs. The drugs that (mostly) cause addiction seldom cause hostility.
> And im not sure if the meds that can cause hostility also are addictive.
>
> If you could be more specific, i could give a specific answer.
>
L,
How do you make the conclusion that the drugs that mostly cause addiction seldom cause hostility?
Lou
Posted by Lamdage22 on October 14, 2014, at 19:45:46
In reply to Lou's reply-pseldum » Lamdage22, posted by Lou Pilder on October 9, 2014, at 7:41:39
> > > You wrote,[...it is human(')s choice to continue to take a medication that makes them hostile, isn't it?...].
> > > Would it be their choice if they were addicted to the drug that makes them hostile?
> > > Lou
> >
> > I think the answer to this question is no simple yes/no thing. I would say attenuated.
> > I think its not right to talk like this about ALL drugs. The drugs that (mostly) cause addiction seldom cause hostility.
> > And im not sure if the meds that can cause hostility also are addictive.
> >
> > If you could be more specific, i could give a specific answer.
> >
> L,
> How do you make the conclusion that the drugs that mostly cause addiction seldom cause hostility?
> LouExperience. Benzos don't make you hostile, Ambien doesn't make you hostile. These are that meds that are thought of as addicting in the traditional sense.
The only meds that i can think of that possibly fits your description would be Adderall, Ritalin or Vyvanse.
So what meds are you talking about? Because saying ALL meds can cause what you describe as a mix of addiction AND hostility is a bit unreflected.
How could something like SSRI MAOI or Tricyclics possibly be addicting if it is not helpful at all? Clearly, if it makes you mad enough to kill self and/or others, it is not helping and it is not a pleasant feeling either. Wouldn't most normally wired people immediately stop the drug, because they are worse?
I argue it is only certain people that wouldn't stop at this point. People that are holding a grudge. People that have felt resentful before and the drug only brings it to surface unfortunately.
Maybe people should be screened more for hostility.The only way that i can think of that someone hurts others because of a drug is that the subject has gone psychotic from lets say adderal and holds some kind of severe conspiracy beliefs and feels threatened. A mass murder that is not the result of the most severe and dangerous delusions isn't implemented by good people PERIOD.
No drug will turn an angel into a murderer and no drug turns a criminal into a saint.
I have had the most severe psychosis, so i have a reference point.
So to sum it all up, some drugs can make "bad" people worse, but they also make others better. In the case of SSRI not an awful lot, admittedly.
Posted by Lamdage22 on October 14, 2014, at 19:45:46
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-pseldum, posted by Lamdage22 on October 9, 2014, at 9:18:09
No drug will turn an angel into a murderer and no drug turns a criminal into a saint.
Especially no voluntarily taken drug, because people would just stop them. I knew a girl, she took vyvanse and she stopped because of hostility. I stopped Nardil because of hostility.
We the mentally ill are not all potential killers and not all drugs are a potential contributing factor in mass murder.
CONTRIBUTING. Not THE only caue.
Thats the point i would like you to understand.
Posted by Lou Pilder on October 14, 2014, at 19:45:47
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-pseldum, posted by Lamdage22 on October 9, 2014, at 9:29:31
> No drug will turn an angel into a murderer and no drug turns a criminal into a saint.
>
> Especially no voluntarily taken drug, because people would just stop them. I knew a girl, she took vyvanse and she stopped because of hostility. I stopped Nardil because of hostility.
>
> We the mentally ill are not all potential killers and not all drugs are a potential contributing factor in mass murder.
>
> CONTRIBUTING. Not THE only caue.
>
> Thats the point i would like you to understand.
L,
Let us look at this video:
Lou
[ youtube, 1HXv4Hq2_xo ]
Posted by Phillipa on October 14, 2014, at 19:45:47
In reply to Lou's reply-tehkehychnz » Lamdage22, posted by Lou Pilder on October 9, 2014, at 10:11:36
Careful of the internet especially utubes. Phillipa
Posted by Lamdage22 on October 14, 2014, at 19:45:47
In reply to Lou's reply-tehkehychnz » Lamdage22, posted by Lou Pilder on October 9, 2014, at 10:11:36
Well maybe it sometimes is the major cause. I wouldn't know.
They are primarily talking about SSRI type drugs, which i am not very fond of anyway.
I know people who are being helped by them but i also know it is rare and i know that SSRI kill ability to orgasm. Even if they helped depression which for me, they don't, quality of life wouldn't improve due to anorgasmia.
Posted by Lamdage22 on October 14, 2014, at 19:45:48
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-tehkehychnz, posted by Lamdage22 on October 10, 2014, at 0:44:27
Lou, if mentally healthy people were put on prozac and then killed themselves/others, it would support your statement that they can cause death to self/others.
I don't think anybody gets put on these drugs for no reason at all.
We could go on and discuss all day long. If i were afraid i might kill self/others i would call 911. Simple as that. And i did. Every time.
It was directed towards self though.
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Medication | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.