Shown: posts 1 to 11 of 11. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by SLS on December 31, 2006, at 6:24:06
Posted by Klavot on December 31, 2006, at 15:39:27
In reply to , posted by SLS on December 31, 2006, at 6:24:06
Posted by Tomatheus on December 31, 2006, at 16:43:44
In reply to , posted by SLS on December 31, 2006, at 6:24:06
Hey! How were you able to post a message without a subject?
Tomatheus
Posted by SLS on December 31, 2006, at 16:57:56
In reply to Re:, posted by Tomatheus on December 31, 2006, at 16:43:44
> Hey! How were you able to post a message without a subject?
>
> TomatheusI'm curious as to how you were able to reply to such a post.
- Scott
Posted by Tomatheus on December 31, 2006, at 17:06:53
In reply to Re: » Tomatheus, posted by SLS on December 31, 2006, at 16:57:56
> I'm curious as to how you were able to reply to such a post.
I eventually figured out what the message number and URL were by typing in different message numbers until I came across your message.
Klavot seems to have found a way to reply to your message without posting a subject, which I was not able to do.
Not that having the ability to post (either a new thread or a reply) without a subject is the most crucial thing on earth.
Tomatheus
Posted by SLS on December 31, 2006, at 17:14:01
In reply to Re: » SLS, posted by Tomatheus on December 31, 2006, at 17:06:53
> > I'm curious as to how you were able to reply to such a post.
>
> I eventually figured out what the message number and URL were by typing in different message numbers until I came across your message.
>
> Klavot seems to have found a way to reply to your message without posting a subject, which I was not able to do.
>
> Not that having the ability to post (either a new thread or a reply) without a subject is the most crucial thing on earth.
>
> Tomatheus
You are both pretty clever. More clever than I am, actually. It took me a little while to figure out how you did it. I just used the "view source" browser function to find the post and then pasted the message number into the address window.
- Scott
Posted by tensor on December 31, 2006, at 18:18:28
In reply to Re:, posted by SLS on December 31, 2006, at 17:14:01
>
You are both pretty clever. More clever than I am, actually. It took me a little while to figure out how you did it. I just used the "view source" browser function to find the post and then pasted the message number into the address window.If this isn't lame, I don't know what is.
Posted by Tomatheus on December 31, 2006, at 18:30:55
In reply to Re: » SLS, posted by tensor on December 31, 2006, at 18:18:28
> If this isn't lame, I don't know what is.
I can think of one thing that's definitely more lame.
Tomatheus
Posted by tensor on December 31, 2006, at 18:39:40
In reply to Re: » tensor, posted by Tomatheus on December 31, 2006, at 18:30:55
>I can think of one thing that's definitely more lame.
My thoughts are with you.
Posted by ed_uk on January 1, 2007, at 4:32:01
In reply to Re: » Tomatheus, posted by tensor on December 31, 2006, at 18:39:40
I'm finding this all slightly strange :)
Ed
Posted by SLS on January 1, 2007, at 7:08:39
In reply to Re: » tensor, posted by Tomatheus on December 31, 2006, at 18:30:55
> > If this isn't lame, I don't know what is.
>
> I can think of one thing that's definitely more lame.
>
> Tomatheus
I can think of two things. I wish I had chosen a different time to submit the original post here. Unfortunately, someone alerted me to the fact that it could easily be interpreted as a suicide note at this time of year, so I felt it necessary to continue to participate.
- Scott
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Medication | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.