![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 5 to 29 of 65. Go back in thread:
Posted by Phillipa on May 18, 2006, at 21:35:13
In reply to Re: emsam 6 mg/24 = ? oral selegiline?, posted by strugglingsteve on May 18, 2006, at 21:18:29
Hey steve are you doing better having heard from you. Love Phillipa
Posted by Declan on May 18, 2006, at 21:42:23
In reply to Re: emsam 6 mg/24 = ? oral selegiline?, posted by willyee on May 18, 2006, at 18:19:48
Sorry to change the subject, but this is the first time I've seen Gerovital mentioned. So Willy, is there ANYTHING to recommend it? (I have arthritis) Did you take the Roumanian stuff, or KH3?
Posted by Phillipa on May 18, 2006, at 21:45:57
In reply to Gerovital » willyee, posted by Declan on May 18, 2006, at 21:42:23
Deccie do you really? Can you jump on a trampoline? private joke. Love Phillipa
Posted by Jakeman on May 18, 2006, at 21:58:29
In reply to Re: emsam 6 mg/24 = ? oral selegiline?, posted by willyee on May 18, 2006, at 18:19:48
I have the same thoughts.
> Where do u guys have these doctors who know about these unconventional drugs like oral deprenyl.......prior to the patch i could forget about a doc knowing about deprenyl,or molcimide,or gervitol,or any unconventional drug that isnt main stream us drug,these r the reasons im forced to play doc on my own cause the real docs dont bring things to the table!
Posted by willyee on May 18, 2006, at 22:37:25
In reply to Gerovital » willyee, posted by Declan on May 18, 2006, at 21:42:23
Im not sure,i know its a smart drug also,its very weak with Maoi and as a mood elevator,definatly for mild to moderate depression,so i never looked to deep into it,u prob know this but google groups has a smart drugs group,if u limit ur search to within that group and search it,youl get tons of hits.
I barly remember what it is,i think procaine with maoi properties or something?
Posted by Declan on May 19, 2006, at 1:27:36
In reply to Re: Gerovital, posted by willyee on May 18, 2006, at 22:37:25
Yeah, it's procaine and stuff. Never tried it in spite of the fact that it comes from Roumania.
Posted by mworkman on May 20, 2006, at 18:01:28
In reply to Re: emsam 6 mg/24 = ? oral selegiline?, posted by strugglingsteve on May 18, 2006, at 21:18:29
Which is it 14 or 42? 42 sounds pretty high, 14 seems like a pretty small amount.
Posted by Phillipa on May 20, 2006, at 18:15:08
In reply to emsam 6 mg/24 = ? oral selegiline?, posted by mworkman on May 18, 2006, at 16:17:13
The difference is that the med is in a patch and doesn't go through the digestive system. The med is delivered directly to your body through your skin. People use morphine patches too. And cardiac meds are delivered this way. Love Phillipa ps not all cardiac meds or morphine. They can be in pill form too.
Posted by Declan on May 20, 2006, at 20:10:49
In reply to Re: emsam 6 mg/24 = ? oral selegiline?, posted by mworkman on May 20, 2006, at 18:01:28
42mg selegiline oral? I wouldn't sleep for a week. I can't sleep (properly) on 2mg sublingual deprenyl.
Posted by cecilia on May 25, 2006, at 2:20:17
In reply to emsam 6 mg/24 = ? oral selegiline?, posted by mworkman on May 18, 2006, at 16:17:13
My package says 20 mg and then below that (6mg/24h). My understanding is that a 6mg/24h patch would be equal to 20 mg oral, but the label IS confusing. Cecilia
Posted by mworkman on May 28, 2006, at 23:17:03
In reply to Re: emsam 6 mg/24 = ? oral selegiline?, posted by cecilia on May 25, 2006, at 2:20:17
Well, on rxlist.com, it looks like there is about 7 times as much selegline in the blood with emsam 6 mg compared to 10 mg oral. So the patch does deliver a lot higher dose of selegline. The amphetamine levels are lower also. One of the amphetamines still has a higher concentration in the blood than actuall selegline w/ emsam, though.
Posted by helpme on July 9, 2006, at 10:51:01
In reply to Re: emsam 6 mg/24 = ? oral selegiline?, posted by cecilia on May 25, 2006, at 2:20:17
My doctor, who has some sort of distant consulting relationship with the developers of this drug, also claims this is indeed true, but I am not comprehending how exactly this adds up to equal the 20 mg of pills either. That the "6" has to do with rate of release (sorry I don't remember details) over "24" hours, or something like that. They mean that in the end, at the end of a full 24 hours of having it on, you got your 20mg.
All metabolizing as it gets absorbed; some of the drug entering the bloodstream, some just getting started, some already turning into the amphetamine metabolite and flushing off to wherever the drug goes....some still on the patch seeping in to you...huh? This is where the "6" figure has some kind of significance or meaning-is how I understood what he told me. (Though I confess a lot of confusion and might be totally off-base by now.) Whereas with pills, you get the 20 all at once and it all metabolizes "together".
> My package says 20 mg and then below that (6mg/24h). My understanding is that a 6mg/24h patch would be equal to 20 mg oral, but the label IS confusing. Cecilia
Posted by SLS on July 9, 2006, at 11:03:49
In reply to Re: emsam 6 mg/24 = ? oral selegiline?, posted by helpme on July 9, 2006, at 10:51:01
I think the 20mg refers to the total amount of selegiline contained in the patch.
- Scott
Posted by SLS on July 9, 2006, at 11:19:46
In reply to Re: emsam 6 mg/24 = ? oral selegiline?, posted by SLS on July 9, 2006, at 11:03:49
6mg/24 Emsam = 6mg oral selegiline
The thing is, most of the oral selegiline gets degraded before it ever gets into the main blood stream due to first-pass metabolism in the liver. Therefore, the resulting therapeutic blood level of an equivalent amount of Emsam is much, much higher. I don't happen to know the equivalency.
- Scott
Posted by helpme on July 10, 2006, at 1:28:03
In reply to Re: emsam 6 mg/24 = ? oral selegiline?, posted by SLS on July 9, 2006, at 11:19:46
Yes, I understood that the "6" patch has an equivalent of 20 mg oral in it, but it takes 24 hours to seep out. But what you say about the metabolization making it more available and potent than the oral really does make it very confusing.
> 6mg/24 Emsam = 6mg oral selegiline
>
> The thing is, most of the oral selegiline gets degraded before it ever gets into the main blood stream due to first-pass metabolism in the liver. Therefore, the resulting therapeutic blood level of an equivalent amount of Emsam is much, much higher. I don't happen to know the equivalency.
>
>
> - Scott
Posted by Declan on July 14, 2006, at 1:51:12
In reply to Re: emsam 6 mg/24 = ? oral selegiline?, posted by helpme on July 10, 2006, at 1:28:03
Yeah, look I've been continually frustrated by this whole business because whenever I took deprenyl or selegeline I always dissolved it under my tongue, and didn't swallow any to speak of. I took 1mg to 2.5mg for years. I dunno, it all sounds a bit suss.
Declan
Posted by laima on July 21, 2006, at 15:14:20
In reply to Re: emsam 6 mg/24 = ? oral selegiline?, posted by Declan on July 14, 2006, at 1:51:12
I'm utterly confused about the dosing. Emsam 6 did nothing for me; today I saw my doctor, who just came back from an EMSAM conference where he heard that a lot of people don't get much relief from the 6. So I am going up to "9" as soon as the pharmacy gets it in. Then he mentioned that the "9" is approximately equal to 60-90 mg of the oral???? Anyone out there move up? Did you notice a huge change?
Posted by laima on July 21, 2006, at 15:39:23
In reply to Re: emsam 6 mg/24 = ? oral selegiline?, posted by SLS on July 9, 2006, at 11:03:49
Here's part of my confusion too- if 20mg is the total amount of the drug in the 6/24 patch, why is that not the dose? Ie., why is the dose not known as "20 mg."? Is it not all absorbed over 24 hours? What's with the "6"? Or is this topic so abstract that only a chemist can understand? I just posted on another message in this thread- I have just been raised to the 9/24 patch, and my doctor told me it's roughly equal to 60-90 mg of the pills and a major step up from the "6" patch. I don't get it. He just got back from an EMSAM conference and expertly went on about EMSAM's superior absorption efficiency... So while I wait for my pharmacy to get the 9's in, I wonder if I can or should cut my 6's in half and wear a 6 plus half of a six to equal 9? I wonder if that would be accurate. Whatever, I'll only have to wait for a day or two for the 9's, so maybe I'll just hold off lest I do something really drastic by accident.
> I think the 20mg refers to the total amount of selegiline contained in the patch.
>
>
> - Scott
Posted by laima on July 21, 2006, at 15:58:06
In reply to Re: emsam 6 mg/24 = ? oral selegiline? » willyee, posted by Jakeman on May 18, 2006, at 21:58:29
Dear Jakeman,A teaching doctor affiliated with a university or medical school might be a good bet- they are required to keep up with the latest research to keep their positions, and have a rep of being interested in being the first to know of all the latest available treatments. They discuss everything with their colleagues, and write articles for journals. They also have a rep of being inquisitive and open-minded. I feel very fortunate to have such a doctor- he's a professor, always going to conferences and his office is always strewn with all kinds of medical journals and articles about treatments. One thing I can say, he sure understands we are all different, the finer details of our disorders vary, that not much is simple, and that the same treatment does not fit everyone. He's also not afraid to use drugs in less than conventional ways.
In the past I had a doctor who was not affiliated with teaching, and while a great, smart guy, he seemed ok to dole out the same extolled ssri to everyone, as per conventional wisdom, and with few questions. He seemed to miss nuances about subtypes of depression, and appeared confused when treatment failed. Just kept raising that dose...When utterly at wit's end, he sent me to the aforementioned specialist for a consultation, and this new doctor deduced that I do not agree with ssris (as they can sometimes appparently exasperate sleep problems-making depression worse) and he devised a very different, and far more effective program for me.
If there is no med school hospital anywhere near you, I can tell you that I have a friend who went to Mayo once, and she was thrilled with her experience with the doctors there. She reported that they really "thought outside the box" in an interdisciplinary way.
Very good luck to you, be well.
> > Where do u guys have these doctors who know about these unconventional drugs like oral deprenyl.......prior to the patch i could forget about a doc knowing about deprenyl,or molcimide,or gervitol,or any unconventional drug that isnt main stream us drug,these r the reasons im forced to play doc on my own cause the real docs dont bring things to the table!
>
>
Posted by jealibeanz on July 21, 2006, at 17:57:38
In reply to Re: emsam 6 mg/24 = ? oral selegiline? » Jakeman, posted by laima on July 21, 2006, at 15:58:06
Does your doctor seem to have a positive opinion of EMSAM, or think it's mostly hype?
Posted by laima on July 21, 2006, at 18:53:56
In reply to Re: emsam 6 mg/24 = ? oral selegiline?, posted by jealibeanz on July 21, 2006, at 17:57:38
> Does your doctor seem to have a positive opinion of EMSAM, or think it's mostly hype?Well, he's a med-school affiliated researcher, and has that nonreactive way about him that you might imagine a researcher would have. I do know he consulted with the pharmaceutical company as they developed the drug, and is giving them loads of feedback now, passed along from his patients. I am positive he isn't the only doctor in their circle doing so. I passed on my concerns about how I don't think it's sticky enough, and he put me right on the phone with them and they will be sending me a more detailed questionaire. The lady I talked to seemed very concerned (?).
Overall, I think he has high hopes but knows we are still in the early stages of the drug's use. I get the impression that the company is taking all comments very seriously and that they may try to make improvements to make it easier to use.
Today (being on the 6) I asked, "should I just go back to the pills", and he said "no!" The patch is believed to be much more efficient in terms of getting to the brain, and at the EMSAM conference he just attended there apparently was much talk about how the 6 is simply too weak for most patients. The 9 of course is dicier diet-wise--but still not nearly as dangerous as the pills. He conveyed, "be careful what you eat while on the 9, but if you slip up, it won't be the same level of danger as if you were on the pills".
Overall, I think he shares our hopes, but comprehends improvements and tweaks are needed. This seems reasonable, it's such a new concept. And me, I hope he's right about the dosage and that the 9 provides the relief I am desperate for! I read between the lines---Big push with the 6 involved the fact it didn't really require any dietary restrictions- a big selling point- whereas the 9 and up do require cautions. An MAOI with no dietary restrictions at all- isn't that what so many of us got so excited about? That total diet freedom might not be reality for many of us yet, alas. Maybe one day, hopefully? Perhaps some of the "diet freedom" then is hype. Massive bummer. I am also told to not let up on being careful with any medications that could interact with an MAOI, even on the 6--because no one seems to know for sure what could happen. Obviously they didn't test people for that, and the incidental reports haven't poured in yet.
Back to the point, I think his opinion is overall positive and quite hopeful. The patch is believed to offer a more efficient delivery to the brain, and to be safer diet-wise. The recent conference sounds as though doctors in attendence were overall positive and enthusiastic. One of them apparently has treated over 150 patients with EMSAM successfully- though most didn't respond until they got 9 or higher. It's still so new though there are many unknowns.
Anyone else have a doctor who went to this recent event? Would be interesting to hear what they had to say...
Posted by jealibeanz on July 21, 2006, at 19:56:47
In reply to Re: emsam 6 mg/24 = ? oral selegiline? » jealibeanz, posted by laima on July 21, 2006, at 18:53:56
I'm surprised they had an entire conference devoted to EMSAM. I wonder if that's common. I've never heard of such a thing. You're lucky to have such an open-minded and informed doctor. Is he a general practitioner or a psychiatrist?
It's good to hear that actual physicians have positive experiences to report. We've heard a great deal of negatives on this message board, but that's probably because the people who are doing well are out living and not searching for something else to help relieve the depression.
That makes sense that the 6mg is too low, but is still being produced. They were probably just desperate to have a dosage which could definitely be marketed as not requiring dietary restriction. I've never found any of the studies that differentiates between the efficacy of the 3 dosages. Maybe they were trying to hide the fact that 6 mg isn't so great. Nonetheless, it can be used as a stepping stone to 9 or 12 mg. Do you know if any discussion has been made about going higher than 12?
I don't see much problem with the diet though. There's really nothing I personally have to avoid, except tap beer, but bottled is OK, which I prefer anyway. The rest of the foods are rather odd... pickled meat, ect. I realize some people will have to give up aged cheese, but at least pizza is still alright!
Do you have any side effects to report? I'm sure there will be many that will be coming in within the next year or so. That's why I question whether my doctor (a GP) would ever consider prescribing this, if he;s even aware of the drug (he should be, right?) unless I begged. It's not that he's one of the docs who's paranoid about being sued for malpractice (especially by me), he just wouldn't want to hurt me or cause any further discomfort (because I have a lot right now!) in my life.
Posted by laima on July 22, 2006, at 9:40:07
In reply to Re: emsam 6 mg/24 = ? oral selegiline?, posted by jealibeanz on July 21, 2006, at 19:56:47
I just tried to reply, wrote a long response, but hit a wrong button and deleted it- so please forgive if I am repeating myself here is this slightly shorter response.
Yes!! Recent ENSAM Conference. I think it was attended by psychiatrists and drug rersearchers and the company who manufactures EMSAM. I understand there were presentations and then the various doctors stood up to share their clinical observations and reports from patients. One important consensis that came up is that it seems that the 6 is simply too low of a dose to benefit most people. One doctor reported that he succesfully treated 150 people with the 9 and the 12. Good news: company apparently took loads of notes on what the doctors were reporting.
I will be switching to the 9, which unfortunately will require dietary cautions and restrictions. I suspect the 6 was so heavily touted precisely because it doesn't require the strict restrictions, but alas some of the freedom supposedly offered by EMSAM apparently isn't turning out to be exactly true in real practice. I think many people might feel let down by this reality. Regardless, the higher dose patches are still said to be safer than the oral pills in case one slightly goofs with their diet. The 9 is said to be roughly equal to 60-90mg of the oral.
My doctor is a psychopharmacologist (psychiatrist who specializes in drugs) and is affiliated with a med school- I guess that's why he's so up on this stuff.
I didn't experience any side effects with the 6- nothing. I think it wqas utterly ineffective for me. This 9 is said to be far more potent, so i'll see how it goes. As for going back to pills- I'm told that all strengths of the patches are safer than the pills, and are far more effective in reaching the brain eficiently. My doctor believes it is a superior product.
Perhaps your gp hasn't heard much about EMSAM yet? It's so new, after all. Are you able to try to find a psychiatrist who might me more informed?
> I'm surprised they had an entire conference devoted to EMSAM. I wonder if that's common. I've never heard of such a thing. You're lucky to have such an open-minded and informed doctor. Is he a general practitioner or a psychiatrist?
>
> It's good to hear that actual physicians have positive experiences to report. We've heard a great deal of negatives on this message board, but that's probably because the people who are doing well are out living and not searching for something else to help relieve the depression.
>
> That makes sense that the 6mg is too low, but is still being produced. They were probably just desperate to have a dosage which could definitely be marketed as not requiring dietary restriction. I've never found any of the studies that differentiates between the efficacy of the 3 dosages. Maybe they were trying to hide the fact that 6 mg isn't so great. Nonetheless, it can be used as a stepping stone to 9 or 12 mg. Do you know if any discussion has been made about going higher than 12?
>
> I don't see much problem with the diet though. There's really nothing I personally have to avoid, except tap beer, but bottled is OK, which I prefer anyway. The rest of the foods are rather odd... pickled meat, ect. I realize some people will have to give up aged cheese, but at least pizza is still alright!
>
> Do you have any side effects to report? I'm sure there will be many that will be coming in within the next year or so. That's why I question whether my doctor (a GP) would ever consider prescribing this, if he;s even aware of the drug (he should be, right?) unless I begged. It's not that he's one of the docs who's paranoid about being sued for malpractice (especially by me), he just wouldn't want to hurt me or cause any further discomfort (because I have a lot right now!) in my life.
Posted by SLS on July 22, 2006, at 11:29:20
In reply to Re: emsam 6 mg/24 = ? oral selegiline? » jealibeanz, posted by laima on July 22, 2006, at 9:40:07
Posted by laima on July 22, 2006, at 11:49:46
In reply to Re: emsam 6 mg/24 = ? oral selegiline? - Thanks. (nm) » laima, posted by SLS on July 22, 2006, at 11:29:20
I hope I don't seem stupid- but do you mean thanks for the post? I got a bit carried away there due to excitement, and don't know yet what "nm" means.
Thanks.
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Medication | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.