Psycho-Babble Medication Thread 630791

Shown: posts 49 to 73 of 97. Go back in thread:

 

Re: Blind Faith In A P Doc

Posted by LegWarmers on April 9, 2006, at 18:43:02

In reply to Re: Blind Faith In A P Doc » Phillipa, posted by linkadge on April 9, 2006, at 18:23:58

> Thats a very good example. Doctors don't know everything. They will try to chalk everything up to your nerves.
>

Its true that they don't know everything, and in some cases when they have reason to believe that someone is suffering from anxiety or depression assume thats the casue... but... they did go through a lot of years of medical school so that they can help people. Some of those years in med school must have rubbed of on them ; ). And a lot of symptoms of depression and anxiety truely do mimic other health issues. But it IS thier job to look into all possibilties. I have had some terrible experiences with doctors, but I'd say the majority of doctors are good. Its that when we have experiences clsoe to us we tend to generalize out... and people are more likely to complain about something then they are to praise it so its normal to hear more about unhappy peoples experience then happy ones. If people are unhappy with their doctors, they shouldn't stay with them. And as patients, we have the right to get second, and third opinions and that really is what we should be doing, if someone doesn't trust thier doctor, they shouldn't stick around. Its our life and our health. this site is great for education about meds as long as we remember that each body reacts differnetly.
i do agree though, that blind faith in anyone is probably not the best way to think... and yes, a lot of people do that with doctors.

 

Re: Blind Faith In A P Doc

Posted by Racer on April 9, 2006, at 18:58:24

In reply to Re: Blind Faith In A P Doc, posted by Phillipa on April 9, 2006, at 17:56:00

> Another scenario. When I met my husband his Mother had shorness of breath and weakness . She saw a pdoc and he said the reason was anxiety and depression.

That's a terrible story, Phillipa, but I'd like to clarify something: was this a pdoc? Or did you mean she saw a doctor?

If this really was a pdoc, then I'm not surprised her condition was missed. A pdoc is going to look for the psychiatric issue underlying physical symptoms such as shortness of breath, right? Because that's what a pdoc will usually see.

If she saw a GP, it's still pretty egregious that he didn't run some tests, but you know what? ALS is not a common disease, and I'd bet a lot of doctors would miss it. It's unfortunate, but it's true.

 

Re: Blind Faith In A P Doc

Posted by ed_uk on April 9, 2006, at 19:13:15

In reply to Re: Blind Faith In A P Doc, posted by Racer on April 9, 2006, at 18:58:24

I get the impression that there are more bad psychiatrists than there are bad gastroenterologists, bad surgeons, bad radiologists, bad anesthesiologists, bad pediatricians.......

I have seen some nice pdocs. Nice: yes. Good: no.

Ed

 

Re: Blind Faith In A P Doc

Posted by cecilia on April 9, 2006, at 19:20:19

In reply to Re: Blind Faith In A P Doc, posted by Racer on April 9, 2006, at 18:58:24

Medicine changes rapidly, so it's not reasonable to expect a pdoc to be up to date on all physical problems (which begs the question, why are they expected to go to medical school in the 1st place), BUT a pdoc should make sure a patient has had a recent physical before dismissing their problems as depression and anxiety. Few do, though, and well Lou Gehrigs disease is rare, many pdocs don't even check for common problems like thyroid. And vise versa. of course, regular docs often dismiss anything a patient with depression or anxiety says. Cecilia

 

Re: Blind Faith In A P Doc » Racer

Posted by Phillipa on April 9, 2006, at 20:14:21

In reply to Re: Blind Faith In A P Doc, posted by Racer on April 9, 2006, at 18:58:24

Racer both. First an internist with a large practice and when he got tired of her not being able to breathe or go up and down stairs he sent her to a pdoc to get her out of his hair. And now me. First an internist after a trip to the Er for Shortness of breath. The Er doc referred me to a neurologist who did Mri's of brain, neck, and cervical spine. And then another trip to the Er waiting for my appointment with the neurolosist this time atypical chest pain. Percocet so I could sleep without pain and then the neurologist got the reports saw me and now a neurosurgeon tomorrow as the spinal canal is being compressed by discs and a herniated disc in another area. And he's afraid of paralysis if a car accident and he said yes that may be why you lost your taste and smell, can't feel the urge to void, or defecate. So You have to advocated for yourself and not believe one person cause they have been to medical school. Oh another instance is my husband's brother was having horrible headaches the internist said take aspirin. Miraculously his parents took him to a neurologist who did an MRI and low and behold he had a large brain tumor. Surgery could only remove a portion of it. That was way before I met him. And his brother was a teenager at the time and today is like a stroke victum. So if any of you wonder why I dont't have blind faith in a pdoc or other doctor I can give you a lot of other examples. One other a lady in the hospital had lice and there is a med you rub all over the body and 30minutes later wash it off. Well the doctor didn't write to wash it off and a week later the lady started having seizures never had them before. I started my shift and was asked to help move her and her belongings to another floor. I found the tube of the medicine. She wasn't my patient we always worked togehter . I said what is this. A bunch of shocked people said OMG. Well needless to say it had caused the seizures but the doc wrote the order wrong and no one picked up on it unfortunately. She did live. But no one was allowed to tell the family or talk about what happened it would have meant a law suit. Should I go on or is this enough? Love Phillipa

 

Re: Blind Faith 'M SO GLAD MY DR. WAS RIGHT » Phillipa

Posted by Squiggles on April 9, 2006, at 20:23:53

In reply to Re: Blind Faith In A P Doc » Racer, posted by Phillipa on April 9, 2006, at 20:14:21

and I was wrong.

He had told me long ago that these
were panic attacks (don't ask me how
they work with w/d, etc.) and I didn't
believe it. The ER dr. said they were
panic attacks and I didn't believe it.
My husband said it was anxiety and
I didn't believe it.

And they all said take a XANAX.

Dang - had I taken the Xanax from the beginning
I would have had neither scepticism and
fear of horror scenarios, nor dyspnea that
mimicked cardiac problems.

SYMPTOMS and SIGNS folks - need a dr.
for that.

Squiggles

 

Parnate is often augmented with Lithium » linkadge

Posted by WeeWilly on April 9, 2006, at 20:30:22

In reply to Re: I get frightened when I read this sort of thing, posted by linkadge on April 9, 2006, at 11:31:36

> I don't think its a matter of being "smarter" than your doctor. When you're dealing with something like a mental health issue, its not always about right and wrong, it can be a matter of what works better and what works worse.
>
> Sure, it can set your mind at ease to think that all of the doctors decisions take place on a wavelength two steps above the average patient, but most of it is trial and error.
>
> My doctor told me it was ok to take lithium and parnate together. When the pharmacy called him back questioning the decision, he recanted !
>
> Thinking you're better than your doctor probably won't get you very far, but as far as do I "trust" my doctor, the answer would have to be: How could anybody fully trust their doctor? Many of these sorts of medical decisions always cary a degree of uncertainty and risk.
>
> You've got to think for yourself. I think it is foolishly to blindly trust every decision a doctor makes for you, under the guise of "oh they know what they're doing"
>
>
> Linkadge

Linkadge,

I can't understand why your doctor recanted on the use of Lithium with Parnate. Lithium is the first line of augmentation when Parnate is not sufficient on its own. Is there something in your individual case that makes it prohibitive?
Thanks. Best wishes

 

Re: Parnate is often augmented with Lithium » WeeWilly

Posted by Squiggles on April 9, 2006, at 20:48:05

In reply to Parnate is often augmented with Lithium » linkadge, posted by WeeWilly on April 9, 2006, at 20:30:22

Have you tried checking a drug interaction
chart? Or perhaps going to Dr. Preskorn's
site of drug compatibilities or incompatibilities,
or Dr. Steven Stah's "Basic Psychopharmacology"?

That might supplement your knowledge;

Squiggles

 

Re: Parnate is often augmented with Lithium

Posted by Caedmon on April 9, 2006, at 20:48:47

In reply to Parnate is often augmented with Lithium » linkadge, posted by WeeWilly on April 9, 2006, at 20:30:22

I'm curious to know too. Stephen Stahl's "Essential Pharmacology" lists Lithium as an augmenter for Parnate. I know because I'm looking at the page right now.

All I can think of is that they might synergistically lower the seizure threshold in people who are susceptible. <shrug> What is contraindicated about Li?

- C

 

Re: Parnate is often augmented with Lithium

Posted by SLS on April 9, 2006, at 21:01:50

In reply to Re: Parnate is often augmented with Lithium, posted by Caedmon on April 9, 2006, at 20:48:47

I always thought that Parnate + lithium was a particularly good combination.

What's the problem? Serotonin syndrome?

There have been reports of serotonin syndrome occuring with combinations of lithium and SRIs. It seems to be relatively rare, though.


- Scott

 

Blocked for a week » Squiggles

Posted by gardenergirl on April 9, 2006, at 21:25:45

In reply to Re: Please be civil » gardenergirl, posted by Squiggles on April 9, 2006, at 14:01:49

> I only said that because Dr. Bob
> kept kicking him out when he posted
> racist remarks here.

Squiggles,
I've read some of the archives, so I'm aware of what you refer to. That said, civility guidelines here do not leave room for characterizing another's posts in a way that could lead others to feel accused. I asked you to be civil before, so now I am blocking you for a week. Dr. Bob has oversight over deputy decisions, and he may view this differently.

Follow-ups regarding these issues, as well as replies to the above post, should be posted to Admin. and should of course themselves be civil.

Regards,

gg acting as deputy for Dr. Bob

 

Re: Blind Faith In A P Doc » Phillipa

Posted by gardenergirl on April 9, 2006, at 21:27:18

In reply to Re: Blind Faith In A P Doc » gardenergirl, posted by Phillipa on April 9, 2006, at 17:41:38

Phillipa,
The team I refer to is your doctor and you. I'm sorry your pdoc is not more receptive to your input. And yes, I'm quite lucky that I have a good working relationship with my doctors.

gg

 

Re: Blind Faith In A P Doc » linkadge

Posted by gardenergirl on April 9, 2006, at 21:30:12

In reply to Re: Blind Faith In A P Doc » gardenergirl, posted by linkadge on April 9, 2006, at 14:54:18

> With such a large population sample, (i.e. in Lilly), one would expect to see the same proportion of depressed people as one would in the general population. (Unless working for Lilly was a significanly less depressing job than the average american job :) )

I'm not sure I can agree with that assumption. There is a significant proportion of persons with depression who are not working. So I think applying general population numbers to a subset that has a higher proportion of persons who are currently working may not be the best way to gauge incidence of depression in this subset.

gg
>

 

Re: Team work

Posted by gardenergirl on April 9, 2006, at 21:33:28

In reply to Re: Team work » linkadge, posted by Squiggles on April 9, 2006, at 14:30:00

> > To work as a team with your doctor, generally you need more than 5 minautes every 2 months.
> >
> > Linkadge

I absolutely agree, and I do not think that seeing a patient for such a limited time is a sound medical practice.
>
> And more than one doctor - no offense gg;
> Squiggles

I'm not sure I understand. A team can consist of two: you and your doctor. And no offense taken. My team consists of my pdoc, my T, and my GP. I suppose you could add my marriage counselor to the team, as a consultant, too. I'm at the center, coordinating all of the above. That part can be difficult and frustrating at times, but since I'm the common denominator, I think it pretty much has to be me.

I guess some could have a case manager coordinating. And I realize IRL things do not always work as they could or should.

gg
>

 

This should happen » cecilia

Posted by Racer on April 9, 2006, at 21:37:33

In reply to Re: Blind Faith In A P Doc, posted by cecilia on April 9, 2006, at 19:20:19

I agree absolutely that far too many pdocs assume everything has been checked out physically, and don't bother to do it themselves. These days, they're checking thyroid more often, but that isn't necessarily enough. I think there should be a protocol that pdocs require a full physical before they start psychotropic drugs.

And I'll make sure it happens when I take over the world, which I can't do this coming week, but I'll let you know about the week after... ;-)

 

Re: Blind Faith In A P Doc » gardenergirl

Posted by Phillipa on April 9, 2006, at 21:40:08

In reply to Re: Blind Faith In A P Doc » linkadge, posted by gardenergirl on April 9, 2006, at 21:30:12

When I was working I wasn't depressed. I only had anxiety treated with a benzo's and a few drink to settle down after a 3-ll shift daily. When I stopped work and drinking due to a high TSH and and started AD's that's when I became depressed so I can no longer work. I told my interenist the other day that I have lost l0 years to ad's that don't work and many pdocs. So I think I will start drinking again. I'd rather have l0 years of a quality life where I could be happy and laugh and work to this stuff. He only looked at me funny as I need no prescription for beer. And me the obedient pt hasen't had a beer in l0 years. So which is better to all of you? Love Phillipa

 

Last thing I should say on this thread

Posted by Racer on April 9, 2006, at 21:52:08

In reply to Re: Blind Faith In A P Doc, posted by cecilia on April 9, 2006, at 19:20:19

This thread is more than a bit upsetting to me, on several levels. For those of you who know a little more about my history, or have read the archives, you'll expect that discussions of bad pdocs bring examples to my mind that still have the power to upset me. For that reason alone, I think after these observations I had best leave this thread alone.

I don't think anyone who comes here takes what their doctors say on any sort of "blind" faith. I think the purpose of this board is education, as well as support, and participation in this site generally makes us informed consumers. (Didn't GG already say this?) And I think that being an informed consumer of psychiatric care is in our best interests. Doctors are not perfect, and not all pdocs are very good at their jobs. (Again -- I know just a bit about bad pdocs.)

That said, no matter how much I learn from this site and the reading it leads me to elsewhere, I am not the best person to choose a treatment plan for myself. Especially when I most need one. I very much doubt that I'm unique in that, either. Depression and anxiety affect our ability to make optimal decisions for our own care, and they affect it negatively. Someone who is deeply depressed is probably not in a great place to choose the best medication to address it, and is probably not going to be very tolerant of start up effects. Thus, the pdoc, monitoring which of those start up effects are most likely to be transient, and which justify stopping a medication.

After trying a number of drugs, many of us will be able to make some predictions. That still doesn't mean that we know best about what medications we should take, and it certainly doesn't speak to whether or not we can combine medications successfully. It doesn't mean that we should be trying to do the doctor's job. And it certainly doesn't mean that we should change medications without a doctor's supervision.

I am certainly not advocating "blind faith" in anyone except Ginger Baker. And I hardly believe that all pdocs are good doctors. But I do think that we'd be wise to focus on working with a pdoc successfully, rather than trying to direct our treatment ourselves.

 

Re: Blind Faith In A P Doc » Phillipa

Posted by Phillipa on April 9, 2006, at 22:02:06

In reply to Re: Blind Faith In A P Doc » gardenergirl, posted by Phillipa on April 9, 2006, at 21:40:08

Sorry don't have time to read the achives. Love Phillipa

 

Re: More ranting about doctors

Posted by rvanson on April 9, 2006, at 22:13:53

In reply to More ranting about doctors, posted by cecilia on April 9, 2006, at 5:32:39

> Plus another pet peeve-so many docs supplement their already hefty incomes via the drug reps. When Cymbalta 1st came out I couldn't believe how many people writing in here who had never been on ANY antidepressant before had been started by their docs on Cymbalta. I mean, where's the common sense, when new drugs come out you try them for your multiple failure patients--I'll be lining up for Emsam; but you don't risk trying a brand new drug on someone who's never tried any drug, you give them one of the tried and true ones, like Celexa or Zoloft, first. Unless you're getting paid under the table (or are just stupid). Cecilia


The "brand" of "medicine" (and I use that word loosely) being practiced by doctors these days is simply incredible or should I say, non-credible.

My own Pdoc had drug company sales people all over the place until enough of us left or complained right around the time Cymbalta came out as well.

If it happens agains with Emsam, I needless to say wont be back in his office again.

 

Re: Blind Faith In A P Doc

Posted by mattw84 on April 9, 2006, at 22:17:53

In reply to Blind Faith In A P Doc, posted by Phillipa on April 9, 2006, at 0:48:45

Why do we trust our doctors to such a great extent. This a great question you have posed. Could it be that they have the piece of paper that we don't, that says that they know more about how the body works than we? Possibly. . . Yet that is a fair argument against it, that we simply know our bodies better than they possibly could.

The difference being, that we know our symptoms, but it takes expertise to know what is causing it. Granted some of us believe that we have been through the hoops so many times that we just know it better by experience.

Often times we will request drugs, or specific treatments. This is insulting to a doctor, in any field. To imply that you have the solution and they weren't capable of coming to it. Other times it is likely just a great difference of opinion.

Bottom line, any good and caring doctor will be willing to see your point of view. If this is not the case then they have no business taking peoples lives into their hands. The point of a doctor-patient relationship is not for one person to run the show, if the patient runs the show who knows what could come of it. I don't think that is a chance any physician is willing to take. A balanced partnership, or team effort is what makes both parties satisfied. Unless the doctor has a "god" complex (which many do develop) you will find that more often than not, doctors are very open to suggestion. Just remember, that you are entitled to your opinion, but more importanly the doctor is entitled to his or hers as well. That is what they get paid for.

No doctor can force anyone to take a medication, or do anything for that matter. You are paying them, but it isn't for them to do everything you want them to do. Rather you are paying for them to help you, the opions on what course of action is necessary to help you may be different but clearly the goal is the same. Fighting a doctors opinion is more often than not counter productive. It will get you farther away from what you want, and leave you stuck with a half *ssed solution that only leaves you more pissed off about the situation. The key is to work with your doctor, not against. Otherwise you are just wasting time and money. Just my two cents.

Regards,

Matt

 

Re: Blind Faith In A P Doc

Posted by rvanson on April 9, 2006, at 22:28:15

In reply to Blind Faith In A P Doc, posted by Phillipa on April 9, 2006, at 0:48:45

> What I don't understand is so many come here to learn about others and their experiences with meds and combos ect. But in the end it seems like everyone thinks their pdoc is like a person to look up to and does whatever he says even though you know your own body better tnan anyone. Why do you spend time here and then do anything he tells you to do. It makes no sense to me you have a mind and a brain . Oh I understand if someone is psychotic or can't maked decisions for themselves but i think the decision to take a med is up to you the patient who pays their bill. Love Phillipa<

There are good Pdocs and bad Pdocs.

If you are your doctor don't "fit" as a team or talks down to you, you need to find another one.

Life is too short and there are lots of doctors willing to try a new med or whatever you might want, if the one you have now won't.

 

Re: Blind Faith In A P Doc » mattw84

Posted by Phillipa on April 9, 2006, at 22:32:09

In reply to Re: Blind Faith In A P Doc, posted by mattw84 on April 9, 2006, at 22:17:53

Matt that's the key partnership. I have had good referrals to excellent medical care in my area. Where it falls short is in the pdoc area. And I don't think a medical doctor maybe surgeons have the God complex. The others especially the ER docs are very compassionate and want what is best for you. Now something must be wrong in this area as the pdocs won't and I say won't work with your medical doctor and have trashed info my medical doctor has sent to him. And this is a large practice and oh the God sydrome is very previlent here. only the pdocs. Do you think a single pdoc is better than a large practice? Love Phillipa

 

Re: Last thing I should say on this thread » Racer

Posted by Phillipa on April 9, 2006, at 23:14:03

In reply to Last thing I should say on this thread, posted by Racer on April 9, 2006, at 21:52:08

Racer I'm sorry it's upsetting and I haven't had time to go through the archives. I will google Racer when I can and then maybe I will understand better. you're right I don't know your history. Love Phillipa

 

Don't bother -- it's not worth the time. (nm) » Phillipa

Posted by Racer on April 10, 2006, at 1:11:58

In reply to Re: Last thing I should say on this thread » Racer, posted by Phillipa on April 9, 2006, at 23:14:03

 

Re: Blind Faith In A P Doc » gardenergirl

Posted by linkadge on April 10, 2006, at 12:40:51

In reply to Re: Blind Faith In A P Doc » linkadge, posted by gardenergirl on April 9, 2006, at 21:30:12

I think this study took that into account. Ie, it was considering the percentage of people in the workforce that you would expect to see on an SSRI.

Linkadge


Go forward in thread:


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Medication | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.