![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 75 to 99 of 124. Go back in thread:
Posted by Shadowplayers721 on September 9, 2004, at 3:32:56
In reply to Bob - Horrifying picture animation!!!, posted by TofuEmmy on September 8, 2004, at 13:43:04
Thank God, I didn't see what you all are talking about. If it was flashing, I would consider that a subliminal message.
The picture that I see on the computer screen is the faded one. How shadows interpretes it - There are two sides of Dr. Bob. There is the side he shows to the outside world. He is an intensive analyzer. He enjoys studying things. He likes to observe intensely. Then, there is a whole other side that no one sees. He pretends to the world this side doesn't exist. But, shadowplayers can see there is a shadow self to Dr. Bob that no one will ever see, because he denies this side exists to himself. Therefore, this thing that you describe that happened was no mistake. He sent his message, but only the shadow self know the true intention. The side Dr. Bob portrays is not conscious of the this process.
Look out, Shadowsplayers noneducated psychiatrist is out for the evening..........Who is the doc and who is the patient? Flashing pictures with a cryptic messages that only the shadow self of Dr. Bob really knows was at the control switch. There was no mistake was there shadow self of Dr. Bob? I understand. .. What do books hitting you in the head symbolize to to you? Why did you choose to flash in this method? Did you get the reaction you hoped for? What reaction were you wanting? Is this an emotion that you feel or is it one that you have placed in your shadow self?
Posted by Dinah on September 9, 2004, at 9:23:14
In reply to For Dinah, posted by Susan47 on September 8, 2004, at 23:56:27
Nor was my support intended solely or even largely for Dr. Bob in this thread. I saw people getting increasingly distressed by the picture. I thought they were almost certainly distressed by a misunderstanding. I attempted to bring everything down a notch in distress level while I did my best to see that Bob came speedily to the board and resolved the matter. Not for Dr. Bob so much as for the distressed posters. The deputy can take leave of absence from the job easier than the the job can take leve of absence from the deputy's sensibilities I suppose. I can see where it might be taken otherwise, but that was my intent.
As for faith in Dr. Bob, I suppose that's true. I think I'd use the word trust more than faith. Faith implies a leap of faith. A belief in something unknowable. While trust is something earned.
I've "known" Dr. Bob through my participation in Babble for a bit over three years. During that time I've disagreed and applauded his decisions. I've been him frustrated by his communication style, utterly infuriated, amused by his wit, touched by his kindness, and highly impressed by his discretion and patience. I don't think he's perfect. I've brought in communications from him to my therapist while I'm dissolved in tears. My therapist looks at them, then me and says "He's an MD psychiatrist." as if that explained everything and no further words were necessary. Must be some sort of interdisciplinary joke, because I always find additional words necessary. :)
But in the three years I've known him, he has never given me any reason to believe that he has anything but the board's best interests at heart. He has never given me any reason to believe he would deliberately hurt us as a joke or use us in hurtful manipulative experiments. He has *earned* my trust, in that sense. Just as my therapist has earned my trust in some areas. Just as my husband has earned my trust in some areas. I may not trust Dr. Bob to interpret posts the way I think he should, or mete out justice the way I think he should, or to understand things the way I think he should. But I trust Dr. Bob implicitly to do those things the way *he* thinks he should, doing what he thinks is *right*. It would have been wrong of *me* to not trust that the man had not done what people were thinking he had done. He has earned that trust from me.
Which is no statement about anyone other than myself. Dr. Bob has earned my trust, I'm not implying that others should consider that he has earned their trust. That's a personal thing.
Posted by Larry Hoover on September 9, 2004, at 9:33:50
In reply to Make no mistake. I am not particularly sweet., posted by Dinah on September 9, 2004, at 9:23:14
> Nor was my support intended solely or even largely for Dr. Bob in this thread. I saw people getting increasingly distressed by the picture. I thought they were almost certainly distressed by a misunderstanding.
And that is the core issue. It does not matter how it came to pass. Bob doesn't assess intent.
I have been blocked for merely agreeing with a poster about the content of his post.
Here, Bob is being judged by his own construct. In so many words, we don't need an absolute definition of incivility. We know it when we see it. His images were not civil. How can his intent be a relevent criterion, when ours is not?
I'm more than happy to give him the benefit of the doubt. But Bob doesn't do that himself.
> But in the three years I've known him, he has never given me any reason to believe that he has anything but the board's best interests at heart.
In the time I have been here, I would make the same statement about myself, imperfect though I may be.
When Bob makes a mistake, it is not him who pays the piper. Zen getting 48 weeks for expressing distress is an act of power, not of judgment.
Lar
Posted by Dinah on September 9, 2004, at 9:43:09
In reply to Re: Make no mistake. I am not particularly sweet. » Dinah, posted by Larry Hoover on September 9, 2004, at 9:33:50
Lar, I also agree that you have earned my trust. Not only as a person, or as a person who has the best interests of the board at heart, but as a person who has respect for the civility rules and civility in general. I have long thought that Dr. Bob has misinterpreted your posts and I tell him so regularly. I have argued your blocks most vociferously.
I don't really see the parallel here though. I think Dr. Bob saw a photo of a man falling under an avalanche of paperwork, not the photo of a man with anything to his throat. His image was not inherently uncivil IMO. When my husband saw the photo, without any preconceptions of what it was, he saw books and papers. In fact he saw a date book at the top with writing at the top and bottom of the cover.
Moreover, Dr. Bob did in effect comply with a Please Restate. He apologized and explained the innocuous content of the photo.
But I have no desire to argue with you on the topic, Lar, and would be more than happy to agree to disagree.
Posted by Larry Hoover on September 9, 2004, at 10:05:02
In reply to Re: Make no mistake. I am not particularly sweet. » Larry Hoover, posted by Dinah on September 9, 2004, at 9:43:09
I appreciate your support. I really do.
> I don't really see the parallel here though.
I didn't mean to draw a literal parallel. I meant to point out that there are likely to be two polarized sides to the perception. The particular side to which one falls is both personal and arbitrary. Judging a member of the opposite side from yourself is capricious and arbitrary. It is neither fair nor just. However, if intent is taken into account, then the situation takes on aspects of fairness and justice that would be otherwise be denied.
Lar
Posted by Dinah on September 9, 2004, at 10:17:30
In reply to Re: Make no mistake. I am not particularly sweet. » Dinah, posted by Larry Hoover on September 9, 2004, at 10:05:02
Hmmm... I think we're talking apples and apples here Lar, and are on the same page. Dr. Bob says he doesn't take intent into account, but what he and you are calling intent, I think I'm calling interpretation. I think Dr. Bob may *think* he doesn't take intent into account, but I don't see how that's possible. Intent is part of interpretation. A sentence or even a word can have so many meanings. It's impossible, IMO, to interpret what *anyone* says without some consideration of intent.
For example, many times teasing things are said on Social between posters who clearly know each other and are fond of each other. Dr. Bob doesn't hand out PBC's or blocks. Although on one occasion he invited anyone who felt uncomfortable to email him privately. Yet if the exact same things were said to strangers, with no underlying affection evident, it would definitely be flagged.
The intent behind the posts is clear and it is obviously taken into account in interpreting the posts. Just as context is obviously taken into account. And probably a host of other things that a communications expert would understand better than I. It can't be otherwise or communication would be impossible.
So what you're saying is that Dr. Bob is interpreting your posts correctly but ignoring intent. What I'm saying is that Dr. Bob is misinterpreting your posts by misinterpreting intent. And Dr. Bob is saying he doesn't take intent into account, but I think he means something totally different than either of us means by that.
Posted by Susan47 on September 9, 2004, at 11:30:33
In reply to I have the old picture that changes a bit, posted by Shadowplayers721 on September 9, 2004, at 3:32:56
Posted by alesta on September 9, 2004, at 15:00:32
In reply to Your post tickled my funny bone Shadow. (nm), posted by Susan47 on September 9, 2004, at 11:30:33
i really am sorry for what i said...attacking people is really not my style at all..in real life it takes a lot for me to even raise my voice (except when pms-ing :)). i suppose i was just frustrated...i saw the picture as representing a suicide gesture, and felt like my impression was invalidated..i totally handled this situation in the wrong manner...i sincerely am sorry...
amy:)
Posted by partlycloudy on September 9, 2004, at 15:19:22
In reply to i would really like to apologize....:), posted by alesta on September 9, 2004, at 15:00:32
Posted by alesta on September 9, 2004, at 16:02:53
In reply to We're all human. forgeddaboudit. (nm), posted by partlycloudy on September 9, 2004, at 15:19:22
Posted by Shadowplayers721 on September 9, 2004, at 16:51:23
In reply to We're all human. forgeddaboudit. (nm), posted by partlycloudy on September 9, 2004, at 15:19:22
I agree we are all human as the wise poster stated. However, (oh, oh here comes the noneducated psychiatrist on staff in Shadowplayers) this was a control study mind you. The frequency of the flash was designed to make one see into their subconscious. Some saw a razor, gun, etc. The response was overwhelming. To doc Bob conscious mind, "It was interesting." Hence, he (Dr. Bob) was doing a study of sorts. One he (his shadow self) does not realize is he is seeing into his own subconscious via proxy of Pschobabble world. Therefore, one doesn't do a study to others without doing a study for a self discovery of oneself. Perhaps, Dr. Bob is really trying to see the side that I see, but can't be seen with the eye. There is much to tell. But, I must get back to my readings or the book may fall into my lap or my head for that matter.
GEEES!!!! I don't know about you, but this noneducated psychiatrist is really scary. I don't think that I want to hang out with the noneducated psychiatrist. Whew!!!
Posted by Dr. Bob on September 9, 2004, at 17:39:59
In reply to i would really like to apologize....:), posted by alesta on September 9, 2004, at 15:00:32
Posted by TofuEmmy on September 9, 2004, at 19:21:52
In reply to Re: thanks (nm) » alesta, posted by Dr. Bob on September 9, 2004, at 17:39:59
...so we can buy Dr Bob a decent camera.... ;-)
Since yesterday Bob has sent me not 1, but 3 apologies. So, now I will tear up this plane ticket to Chicago. I had intended on going there and stomping the %&@# out of his little webcam.
All better now.
Emmy
Posted by Dinah on September 9, 2004, at 19:24:50
In reply to I'm starting a new donation fund...., posted by TofuEmmy on September 9, 2004, at 19:21:52
Glad you're feeling better, Emmy.
Posted by Dinah on September 9, 2004, at 19:28:14
In reply to I'm starting a new donation fund...., posted by TofuEmmy on September 9, 2004, at 19:21:52
While I'll admit to a fair amount of idealizing transference towards you (you're in my envelope of issues), my trust in you also has a firm foundation in history and in your actions over time.
Sometimes a banana is just a banana, Anna.
Posted by Cass on September 9, 2004, at 19:38:25
In reply to Re: And See Dr. Bob?, posted by Dinah on September 9, 2004, at 19:28:14
I never felt that Dr. Bob was trying to torment us with that photo. It would seem too out of character.
Posted by KaraS on September 9, 2004, at 19:38:58
In reply to i would really like to apologize....:), posted by alesta on September 9, 2004, at 15:00:32
> i really am sorry for what i said...attacking people is really not my style at all..in real life it takes a lot for me to even raise my voice (except when pms-ing :)). i suppose i was just frustrated...i saw the picture as representing a suicide gesture, and felt like my impression was invalidated..i totally handled this situation in the wrong manner...i sincerely am sorry...
>
> amy:)
You saw it based on your own particular filter which derives from your personal experiences. I'm sure I would have seen it the same way had I gone through what you have. I'm sorry if my post made you feel invalidated. It certainly wasn't meant to. I do hope you'll come back to psycho-babble.Kara
Posted by Susan47 on September 9, 2004, at 19:57:16
In reply to I'm starting a new donation fund...., posted by TofuEmmy on September 9, 2004, at 19:21:52
Oh Emmy I'm so glad you're not going to Chicago :) Not yet anyways. Not without me. I want to see Dr. B too! I just have this feeling about him.. I suppose I'm transferring again. Ah yah.
Posted by saw on September 10, 2004, at 1:48:24
In reply to i would really like to apologize....:), posted by alesta on September 9, 2004, at 15:00:32
Posted by All Done on September 10, 2004, at 9:50:02
In reply to I'm starting a new donation fund...., posted by TofuEmmy on September 9, 2004, at 19:21:52
> So, now I will tear up this plane ticket to Chicago.
What??? And I had a nice tofu dinner waiting just for you. I guess I'll go fling it at D and see what happens. Hmpf.
--Sorry, Dr. Bob. I'll keep it admin here (umm, next time).
Posted by TofuEmmy on September 10, 2004, at 10:34:13
In reply to Re: Not coming to Chicago? » TofuEmmy, posted by All Done on September 10, 2004, at 9:50:02
Eat the tofu. Throw ME at D. ;-)
Posted by iris2 on September 17, 2004, at 8:33:42
In reply to Re: Can you email it on to me? » Larry Hoover, posted by Dinah on September 8, 2004, at 18:22:04
> It's hard to comment on it with the flashes I've seen.
I'm curious what this was all about. If anyone has it could you email it to me? I never saw it on my computer. But perhaps you might think it is strange of me to ask after the fact.
Irene
Posted by henrietta on September 19, 2004, at 19:17:20
In reply to Re: not silly to trust » henrietta, posted by Dinah on September 8, 2004, at 20:09:10
Chuckle. What a quaint take, dear. I won't try to explain what is seemingly incomprehensible to so many. It wasn't about you, or any interaction you have had with me. Sorry if I gave that impression. I repeat, it wasn't about you. It's just about the possibility that what some perceive
to be sensitivity is perceived by others to be astonishing
insensitivity. But that's life, ain't it?
regards! hen
Posted by Dinah on September 19, 2004, at 21:33:18
In reply to Re: not silly to trust » Dinah, posted by henrietta on September 19, 2004, at 19:17:20
Sorry, hen. Quaint, I rather like that word. Just a convergence of ideas that happened to be similar to things I had expressed lately, I suppose. It happens. Beardy had a word for it that escapes me for the moment.
We must think on the same wavelength because I've noticed that convergence before. And I rather think it'll happen again, so bear with me.
Posted by Dinah on September 19, 2004, at 22:10:42
In reply to Re: not silly to trust » Dinah, posted by henrietta on September 19, 2004, at 19:17:20
I knew it would come to me if I didn't try to think of it.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=synchronicity
Your post talking about trust and not watching the news. My immediately preceding post about trust and recent ones about not watching the news. Synchronicity!!!
I certainly don't want to have the hubris to think you read any of my posts. Chuckle. It's bad enough that I have the hubris to notice the synchronicity.
I don't see the part about sensitivity/insensitivity in there. I only see trust and not watching the news. But perhaps I'm looking at the wrong post, or interpreting it wrong or something. That happens too.
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.