Psycho-Babble Social Thread 382165

Shown: posts 42 to 66 of 120. Go back in thread:

 

Re: Pet language peeves

Posted by sexylexy on August 29, 2004, at 20:35:26

In reply to Pet language peeves, posted by Emme on August 29, 2004, at 14:15:41

When someone says "Where's it at?" It makes me want to vomit
lexy

 

Re: Pet language peeves

Posted by Larry Hoover on August 29, 2004, at 20:36:58

In reply to Re: Pet language peeves » Catgirl, posted by KaraS on August 29, 2004, at 20:24:54

> > My language pet peeve is people who spell separate seperate. One of my teachers told me to remember that "there's a rat in the middle."
>
>
> Yes, but the correct spelling and the often used incorrect one, both have a "rat" in the middle.

Yes, but only one has "a rat" in the middle. Ambiguous primary reference, methinks.

Lar

 

Re: Pet language peeves

Posted by Catgirl on August 29, 2004, at 20:43:40

In reply to Re: Pet language peeves » Catgirl, posted by KaraS on August 29, 2004, at 20:24:54

> > My language pet peeve is people who spell separate seperate. One of my teachers told me to remember that "there's a rat in the middle."
>
>
> Yes, but the correct spelling and the often used incorrect one, both have a "rat" in the middle.

She meant "a rat" in the middle. Maybe that tip is only helpful to me!

 

Re: Anyone count ums? » JenStar

Posted by Miss Honeychurch on August 29, 2004, at 21:29:26

In reply to Re: Anyone count ums? » Miss Honeychurch, posted by JenStar on August 29, 2004, at 18:42:32

O I so hate so! People use it these days as some sort of ambiguous sentence ender like

"I came to work late this morning, so..." as if the so is implied. I notice this all the time. Glad I'm not the only one.

 

Jenstar and Partly

Posted by Miss Honeychurch on August 29, 2004, at 21:49:59

In reply to Re: Anyone count ums? » JenStar, posted by Miss Honeychurch on August 29, 2004, at 21:29:26

Thanks, guys. After I had drafted up a really nice sarcastic, passive aggressive response, I decided to delete it and try to be mature. You guys defended the spirit in which this thread was intended very well!

 

me too!! (nm) » sexylexy

Posted by Miss Honeychurch on August 29, 2004, at 22:03:50

In reply to Re: Pet language peeves, posted by sexylexy on August 29, 2004, at 20:35:26

 

Re: Apostrophe Abuse

Posted by LostGirl on August 29, 2004, at 22:18:29

In reply to Apostrophe Abuse, posted by Miss Honeychurch on August 25, 2004, at 12:54:46

There is a book "Eats, Shoots and Leaves" which is exactly about this.

 

Re: Pet language peeves » Larry Hoover

Posted by KaraS on August 29, 2004, at 22:20:25

In reply to Re: Pet language peeves, posted by Larry Hoover on August 29, 2004, at 20:36:58

> > > My language pet peeve is people who spell separate seperate. One of my teachers told me to remember that "there's a rat in the middle."
> >
> >
> > Yes, but the correct spelling and the often used incorrect one, both have a "rat" in the middle.
>
> Yes, but only one has "a rat" in the middle. Ambiguous primary reference, methinks.
>
> Lar
>

OK, now I get it!

 

Re: Pet language peeves

Posted by KaraS on August 29, 2004, at 22:21:19

In reply to Re: Pet language peeves, posted by Catgirl on August 29, 2004, at 20:43:40

> > > My language pet peeve is people who spell separate seperate. One of my teachers told me to remember that "there's a rat in the middle."
> >
> >
> > Yes, but the correct spelling and the often used incorrect one, both have a "rat" in the middle.
>
> She meant "a rat" in the middle. Maybe that tip is only helpful to me!

No, that will be very helpful to me too! Thanks.

 

Re: double double quotes » LostGirl

Posted by Dr. Bob on August 30, 2004, at 1:54:16

In reply to Re: Apostrophe Abuse, posted by LostGirl on August 29, 2004, at 22:18:29

> There is a book "Eats, Shoots and Leaves" which is exactly about this.

I'd just like to plug the double double quotes feature at this site:

http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#amazon

The first time anyone refers to a book without using this option, I post this to try to make sure he or she at least knows about it. It's just an option, though, and doesn't *have* to be used. If people *choose* not to use it, I'd be interested why not, but I'd like that redirected to Psycho-Babble Administration:

http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20020918/msgs/7717.html

Thanks!

Bob

 

Re: please be civil » ron1953

Posted by Dr. Bob on August 30, 2004, at 1:56:40

In reply to Re: Apostrophe Abuse, posted by ron1953 on August 29, 2004, at 11:46:04

> If this bothers you and the others that agree as much as it seems to, I'd hate to see your reaction to a real problem.

Please don't post anything that could lead others to feel put down.

If you or anyone else has questions about this or about posting policies in general, or is interested in alternative ways of expressing oneself, please see the FAQ:

http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#civil

Also, follow-ups regarding these issues should be redirected to Psycho-Babble Administration.

Thanks,

Bob

 

Re: Apostrophe Abuse - Please mind your manners?

Posted by ron1953 on August 30, 2004, at 17:54:14

In reply to Re: Apostrophe Abuse » ron1953, posted by partlycloudy on August 29, 2004, at 12:50:37

Why the chiding?

 

Re: please be civil » Dr. Bob

Posted by ron1953 on August 30, 2004, at 18:03:48

In reply to Re: please be civil » ron1953, posted by Dr. Bob on August 30, 2004, at 1:56:40

Bob:

It's interesting that my "offense" was about the use of the language. If I had said, "I'm concerned that a seemingly small-time thing like grammer bothers you so much.", would that have made a difference? It is actually what I meant (I think, depending again on interpretation.)

Ron

 

Re: Apostrophe Abuse » JenStar

Posted by ron1953 on August 30, 2004, at 18:17:41

In reply to Re: Apostrophe Abuse, posted by JenStar on August 29, 2004, at 14:09:33

Please see my reply to Dr. Bob's warning.

 

PLEASE DO NOT POST TO ME. (nm) » ron1953

Posted by partlycloudy on August 30, 2004, at 19:15:04

In reply to Re: Apostrophe Abuse - Please mind your manners?, posted by ron1953 on August 30, 2004, at 17:54:14

 

MOSTLYcloudy (nm)

Posted by ron1953 on August 30, 2004, at 19:34:05

In reply to PLEASE DO NOT POST TO ME. (nm) » ron1953, posted by partlycloudy on August 30, 2004, at 19:15:04

 

(((((((((PC))))))))))))))

Posted by gardenergirl on August 30, 2004, at 21:14:42

In reply to MOSTLYcloudy (nm), posted by ron1953 on August 30, 2004, at 19:34:05

I'm offended for you.

Take care, sweetheart.

BTW, we have retail management in common, too. Takes a special sort of energy and patience to do that!

gg

 

Re: PLEASE DO NOT POST TO ME.

Posted by Jai Narayan on August 30, 2004, at 22:17:02

In reply to PLEASE DO NOT POST TO ME. (nm) » ron1953, posted by partlycloudy on August 30, 2004, at 19:15:04

What is going on here?
My goodness.
can we be of help?
dear Dr. Bob.......

 

Re: PLEASE DO NOT POST TO ME. » Jai Narayan

Posted by ron1953 on August 30, 2004, at 22:33:24

In reply to Re: PLEASE DO NOT POST TO ME., posted by Jai Narayan on August 30, 2004, at 22:17:02

Jai:

I'd like to know the same thing. There are some over-sensitive women on this site. I'd like to un-register but I can't find out how to do it. Do you?

 

BABBLE FROM A BUNCH OF FUCKING PSYCHOS (nm) » partlycloudy

Posted by ron1953 on August 30, 2004, at 22:37:50

In reply to PLEASE DO NOT POST TO ME. (nm) » ron1953, posted by partlycloudy on August 30, 2004, at 19:15:04

 

Re: PLEASE DO NOT POST TO ME. » ron1953

Posted by Larry Hoover on August 30, 2004, at 22:42:28

In reply to Re: PLEASE DO NOT POST TO ME. » Jai Narayan, posted by ron1953 on August 30, 2004, at 22:33:24

> Jai:
>
> I'd like to know the same thing. There are some over-sensitive women on this site. I'd like to un-register but I can't find out how to do it. Do you?

Ron, registration only permits posting. Nobody is forcing you to read other posts, and most especially, nobody is making you decide to reply. If it's unpleasant for you, as constituted, you could just decide to ignore Babble altogether.

Lar

 

Re: Please keep a civil tongue (nm) » ron1953

Posted by Larry Hoover on August 30, 2004, at 22:43:30

In reply to BABBLE FROM A BUNCH OF FUCKING PSYCHOS (nm) » partlycloudy, posted by ron1953 on August 30, 2004, at 22:37:50

 

Can't argue with that logic. Adios. (nm) » Larry Hoover

Posted by ron1953 on August 30, 2004, at 22:45:07

In reply to Re: PLEASE DO NOT POST TO ME. » ron1953, posted by Larry Hoover on August 30, 2004, at 22:42:28

 

ALSO A BUNCH OF POLITICALLY CORRECT ASSHOLES (nm)

Posted by ron1953 on August 30, 2004, at 22:47:23

In reply to Re: Please keep a civil tongue (nm) » ron1953, posted by Larry Hoover on August 30, 2004, at 22:43:30

 

Re: Please keep a civil tongue

Posted by gardenergirl on August 30, 2004, at 22:47:35

In reply to Re: Please keep a civil tongue (nm) » ron1953, posted by Larry Hoover on August 30, 2004, at 22:43:30

Holy cow!


Go forward in thread:


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Social | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.