Psycho-Babble Social Thread 1114852

Shown: posts 1 to 6 of 6. This is the beginning of the thread.



Posted by alexandra_k on May 1, 2021, at 16:43:19

the medical people in nz are fond of making threats.

before covid they were threatening that people would die in the ER if they didn't get more money. the face of that was the ER nurses. the ones who work more shifts than they are supposed to, the ones who don't go home when they are supposed to. the ones who are burning out. the ones who say that they are burning out and someone is going to die.

the ones who are begging for someone (with some actual f*ck*ng authority) to say 'go home'. as in 'your shift is over -- go home. get out of here. leave right now or security will escort you out. if you aren't on duty get the f*ck out of here'.

a while ago with the white island tragedy thing one of the ER doctors was saying that she never saw so many cardiologists in one room at one time before. and there they were getting in the way in her ER.

and i understand people are traumatised. and there is this whole thing of 'if i don't do it then nobody will and it won't get done' but the other side to that is that you have these people who get in there and get in the way so that other people can't do anything at all.

your shift is over. go home. get some sleep. you aren't any good to anybody else when you burn yourself out like that.

anyway... that was before covid. people will die because there isn't enough money.

then covid came. and there weren't any people in the er. and so they got to have a break?

no... they kept crying for money. they did. the politicians were like 'but there aren't any people in the er... what's your problem now??' but they kept crying for money.

and then there was this thing about training. refusing to train new nurses. refusing to sign them off. refusing to allow anybody else to do anything.

and now the demands are... that people will die in ambulances becuase they won't let them into the er.

and of course when people get into the er they will hold them involuntary to keep up their numbers (like they did to me).

you have medical people saying that if euthanasia is legalised then people will be murdered all over the show.

they are promising.

that's the way to hear that.

they are committed.


Re: threats

Posted by alexandra_k on May 1, 2021, at 16:50:37

In reply to threats, posted by alexandra_k on May 1, 2021, at 16:43:19

we just can't / won't do informed consent. they don't / can't / won't understand.

we aren't able to do any of the most basic of things...

you have kids who need a quiet time out room at shcool. a place where they can go (voluntarily of their own choosing) to get away from... other studnets. or noise. or whatever. a slow stimulus quiet place.

traditionally that would have been a library.

but we don't really have libraries, as such, anymore. low stimulus environments. instead we busy libraries up with noise and bustle because we think that if they aren't noisy and bustly they have no function.

so you have these kids who... lash out. because they can't get things to turn down. turn off. step back. get out of my face.

then what happens is people... often... once they have found buttons to push then they push buttons.

if they find a weakness (that's the perception) then they will exploit it. magnify the situation.

then they will cry cry cry for government handouts for having the kid otherwise the kid is to be excluded.

they get money for the special kids you see. so they like to try and make special kids. if you can figure a way to provoke the kid to violence or some kind of outburst like that... particularly when you can get the parents onside of cry cry crying for government handouts...

why wouldn't you if you are getting away with it?

so it comes down to finding wha tis needed... and doing the opposite. to make the situation worse. to cry for more money.

in health
any of the social services, really.

that's how to grow a business. that's the business model.

the thing about the 'handmaids tale' that they forgot... is the background is wrong. the background... is a world in which you have millions upon millions of homo sapiens throwing out... animals.

and just a few precious people being produced.


Re: threats

Posted by alexandra_k on May 1, 2021, at 16:51:45

In reply to Re: threats, posted by alexandra_k on May 1, 2021, at 16:50:37

that's the administrators view of it, i mean to say.

just a few of their own precious children being produced.

and everybody else is just an animal to be exploited for the further benefits and advantages and pleasures and so on of the elite few.


Re: threats

Posted by alexandra_k on May 1, 2021, at 17:01:35

In reply to Re: threats, posted by alexandra_k on May 1, 2021, at 16:51:45

it really is the case that the NZL think-tank read dystopian novels produced in the '60's and instead of thinking how we can make better futures... decided to choose to invest in worse futures.

because it's so... blatant.

the alcohol strategy particularly. smoking -- to be replaced by vapeing.

the first trimester is very important to the developing foetus. and then with birthing...

keeping them in incubators.

all the soviet orphanage things. we have that, here. we try and dress it up, but that's what's going on. intentionally keeping infants in conditions precisely in order to induce failure to thrive. precisely in order to upset the infant - mother bond.

there has been an inkling recently... some suggestion that maaori take the narrative back from this idea that maaori men are warrior criminals. once were warriors type of narrative. think about how many gentle and kind maaori giants you have known... people know this to be true. tap into that narrative.

the narrative has been this idea that maaori mothers aren't able to bond with their infants so they aren't able to be in tune with the infants needs so they aren't able to provide security and other things to their infants.

but it is also true that government medical doctors intervene to wrench the infants from their mothers during birthing, after birthing and up until the point where the government social workers take the infants and put them in some state care institution to be abused.

we are big on incubators for premature babies in nz.

and studies of nutritional deprivation.

i wonder what is in the water for those kids with the teeth rotting out of their heads and rickets.

apparently it is lack of fluoride that is the problem.

which is precisely what makes me think... that it could be too much fluoride that is teh problem. because someitmes with things like that symptoms of deprivation and symptoms of toxicity are similar enoguh to be fairly indistringuishable. it's a great way of having something magnify or escalate rather than return to homeostasis. teh cure to itself be the driver. so too much fluoride leads to mottled teeth etc. then they can go 'not enough fluoride see see see'

if you wanted to know what dose was toxic for people or growing kids... you could always experiment on tha tpopulation...

or if you wanted to keep that population sick and deprived and so on you could simply make sure they are fed a stream of toxic things. i mean why wouldn't you if you are getting away with it.

i suppose international sources have directed the NZ government to take more direct responsibility for what is going on in the regions. Fobbing things off thorugh many layers of mismanagement. Blaming councils for incompetence etc.


Re: threats

Posted by alexandra_k on May 1, 2021, at 17:04:38

In reply to Re: threats, posted by alexandra_k on May 1, 2021, at 17:01:35

it probably is lead in the water pipes. i see that biden has named that specifically in the us as something they are going to invest in changing. replacing lead water pipes.

which makes me think that that is likely a problem in nz too. only we won't get there for a few more generations.

i f*ck*ng hate retard-land


Re: threats

Posted by alexandra_k on May 1, 2021, at 17:16:02

In reply to Re: threats, posted by alexandra_k on May 1, 2021, at 17:04:38

of course it is a narrative that will be perverted.

the ideal will be presented as someone who has had a lobotomy. i'm sorry, i think we call that 'nasal polyp removal' these days. i think that is the idea...

This is the end of the thread.

Show another thread

URL of post in thread:

Psycho-Babble Social | Extras | FAQ

[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,

Script revised: February 4, 2008
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.