Psycho-Babble Faith Thread 1035464

Shown: posts 1 to 16 of 16. This is the beginning of the thread.

 

nada

Posted by 10derheart on January 14, 2013, at 0:30:07

****

 

Re: nada 10derheart

Posted by SLS on January 14, 2013, at 7:40:04

In reply to nada, posted by 10derheart on January 14, 2013, at 0:30:07

> ****

xoxo

 

Lou's request-heratnel 10derheart

Posted by Lou Pilder on January 20, 2013, at 8:32:21

In reply to nada, posted by 10derheart on January 14, 2013, at 0:30:07

> ****

10_
I am unsure as to what your purpose, if any, is in relation to what you posted here. If you could post your rationale for posting what you have here, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly. If you are going to take the position of being unable/unwilling or something else for not posting a response to my request here, could you post somewthing else in relation to ruling out that what you posted has nothing to do with the purpose of this forum as that faith is the subject?
Lou

 

Head ---) Desk...repeat (nm)

Posted by gardenergirl on January 20, 2013, at 10:50:09

In reply to Lou's request-heratnel 10derheart, posted by Lou Pilder on January 20, 2013, at 8:32:21

 

Lou's request (---Desk) gardenergirl

Posted by Lou Pilder on January 20, 2013, at 10:58:10

In reply to Head ---) Desk...repeat (nm), posted by gardenergirl on January 20, 2013, at 10:50:09

gg,
I am unsure as to what you are wanting to mean, if anythng, by what you posted as a reply to what I posted here. If you could post here what the words/other in your post mean, then I could have the opportunity to respond to you here. Here are each of words/other
A.Head
B.---
C. )
D.esk
E...
F. repeat
G. the entire message
Lou

 

Coward. Lou Pilder

Posted by SLS on January 20, 2013, at 14:08:15

In reply to Lou's request-heratnel 10derheart, posted by Lou Pilder on January 20, 2013, at 8:32:21

> > ****
>
> 10_
> I am unsure as to what your purpose, if any, is in relation to what you posted here. If you could post your rationale for posting what you have here, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly. If you are going to take the position of being unable/unwilling or something else for not posting a response to my request here, could you post somewthing else in relation to ruling out that what you posted has nothing to do with the purpose of this forum as that faith is the subject?
> Lou

Look, Pilder. This is not a game. Stop chasing people looking for trouble. I don't know why you have chosen 10derHeart to bully, but you are truly a coward for doing so. I think it is about time for you to spend more time working on your own character than to attack the character of others. Coward.

I truly hope that you feel put down. You should only know how low you truly are. I am sure that you won't feel put down, though, as you are impervious to peer pressure and shame.

If you are not a bully, then you are surely paranoid that you should worry so much about someone's posting "****". Perhaps you should revisit psychiatric treatment. Feel free to respond to this post. Also, feel free to report this post to the administrators of this forum. If Dr. Hsiung does decide to intervene (which I hope he does), it is inevitable that you will be blocked from posting on Psycho-Babble should you not change your posting behavior. Of course, I will be blocked, too, but I don't really mind.

Also, stop crying wolf. When a true wolf shows up, no one will want to hear or believe your cries.


- Scott

 

Re: Lou's request (---Desk) Lou Pilder

Posted by gardenergirl on January 20, 2013, at 22:10:30

In reply to Lou's request (---Desk) gardenergirl, posted by Lou Pilder on January 20, 2013, at 10:58:10

.

 

Lou's reply-rhedyrek? gardenergirl

Posted by Lou Pilder on January 21, 2013, at 8:15:55

In reply to Re: Lou's request (---Desk) Lou Pilder, posted by gardenergirl on January 20, 2013, at 22:10:30

> .

gg,
I do not understand what your post signifies, if anything as in the (> .). If you could also post here as to if what you have posted concerns the purpose of this forum which is discussion about the service and worship of God or the supernatural, then I could determine if the thread is a candidate for redirection to a different forum here or not.
Lou

 

Administrative issues? Lou Pilder

Posted by SLS on January 21, 2013, at 9:39:33

In reply to Lou's reply-rhedyrek? gardenergirl, posted by Lou Pilder on January 21, 2013, at 8:15:55

> > .
>
> gg,
> I do not understand what your post signifies, if anything as in the (> .). If you could also post here as to if what you have posted concerns the purpose of this forum which is discussion about the service and worship of God or the supernatural, then I could determine if the thread is a candidate for redirection to a different forum here or not.
> Lou


If you conclude that the post you are so concerned with is a candidate for redirection to another forum, what would your course of action be? What if you receive no reply to your inquiry of the author of that post? You could, of course, use the redirection function as outlined in this website's FAQ page to redirect *your* post to the board most appropriate for administrative issues such as questioning the candidacy of a post for redirection.

Personally, I interpret "****" as the beauty of God's universe, as there are four dimensions comprising its existence (such as we know it).

I interpret "." as the beauty of God's unity and that we are all one. Period.

I think the post you are so concerned with is not a candidate for redirection.

Everyone has an opinion.


- Scott

 

Lou's response-pstrofdehyvd

Posted by Lou Pilder on January 22, 2013, at 21:03:43

In reply to Coward. Lou Pilder, posted by SLS on January 20, 2013, at 14:08:15

> > > ****
> >
> > 10_
> > I am unsure as to what your purpose, if any, is in relation to what you posted here. If you could post your rationale for posting what you have here, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly. If you are going to take the position of being unable/unwilling or something else for not posting a response to my request here, could you post somewthing else in relation to ruling out that what you posted has nothing to do with the purpose of this forum as that faith is the subject?
> > Lou
>
> Look, Pilder. This is not a game. Stop chasing people looking for trouble. I don't know why you have chosen 10derHeart to bully, but you are truly a coward for doing so. I think it is about time for you to spend more time working on your own character than to attack the character of others. Coward.
>
> I truly hope that you feel put down. You should only know how low you truly are. I am sure that you won't feel put down, though, as you are impervious to peer pressure and shame.
>
> If you are not a bully, then you are surely paranoid that you should worry so much about someone's posting "****". Perhaps you should revisit psychiatric treatment. Feel free to respond to this post. Also, feel free to report this post to the administrators of this forum. If Dr. Hsiung does decide to intervene (which I hope he does), it is inevitable that you will be blocked from posting on Psycho-Babble should you not change your posting behavior. Of course, I will be blocked, too, but I don't really mind.
>
> Also, stop crying wolf. When a true wolf shows up, no one will want to hear or believe your cries.
>
>
> - Scott

Friends,
You can read Scott's post here and in it he brings up why I requested for 10_ to post a rationale for what is posted to be on the faith forum. You see, there is great significance in what she posted here. I am prevented from posting here what that is due to prohibitions to me by Mr Hsiung.
YOu see, when something is posted that is not defined, then anyone could make what they want out of what is seen. But there are two things seen. Let's look at them:
A. nada
B. 4 stars
Now you have two things that can be combined. The {nada} means {nothing}. Then we couple the 4 stars with {nothing}.
So one logical conclusion could be that the 4 stars are {nothing}. That may not be known to you as what that could mean, and unless the poster replies to my request for clarficaton, I see what can be seen.
You see, the 4 stars are 6-pointed stars. The Star of David. And posted on the faith forum. Nothing?
Lou

 

Facepalm moment

Posted by gardenergirl on January 25, 2013, at 14:25:43

In reply to Lou's response-pstrofdehyvd, posted by Lou Pilder on January 22, 2013, at 21:03:43


> You see, the 4 stars are 6-pointed stars. The Star of David. And posted on the faith forum. Nothing?
> Lou

Glenn Beck would be so proud.

 

Lou's request-glehnnbhk gardenergirl

Posted by Lou Pilder on February 2, 2013, at 8:43:54

In reply to Facepalm moment, posted by gardenergirl on January 25, 2013, at 14:25:43

>
> > You see, the 4 stars are 6-pointed stars. The Star of David. And posted on the faith forum. Nothing?
> > Lou
>
> Glenn Beck would be so proud.
>
> gg,
You wrote about Glenn Beck. I do not understnd what your post t me means...could you post here more concerning that so that it is clarified?
Lou

 

Lou's response-dakndctr SLS

Posted by Lou Pilder on January 6, 2014, at 20:09:08

In reply to Coward. Lou Pilder, posted by SLS on January 20, 2013, at 14:08:15

> > > ****
> >
> > 10_
> > I am unsure as to what your purpose, if any, is in relation to what you posted here. If you could post your rationale for posting what you have here, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly. If you are going to take the position of being unable/unwilling or something else for not posting a response to my request here, could you post somewthing else in relation to ruling out that what you posted has nothing to do with the purpose of this forum as that faith is the subject?
> > Lou
>
> Look, Pilder. This is not a game. Stop chasing people looking for trouble. I don't know why you have chosen 10derHeart to bully, but you are truly a coward for doing so. I think it is about time for you to spend more time working on your own character than to attack the character of others. Coward.
>
> I truly hope that you feel put down. You should only know how low you truly are. I am sure that you won't feel put down, though, as you are impervious to peer pressure and shame.
>
> If you are not a bully, then you are surely paranoid that you should worry so much about someone's posting "****". Perhaps you should revisit psychiatric treatment. Feel free to respond to this post. Also, feel free to report this post to the administrators of this forum. If Dr. Hsiung does decide to intervene (which I hope he does), it is inevitable that you will be blocked from posting on Psycho-Babble should you not change your posting behavior. Of course, I will be blocked, too, but I don't really mind.
>
> Also, stop crying wolf. When a true wolf shows up, no one will want to hear or believe your cries.
>
>
> - Scott

Friends,
It is written about me here in the above statements by Scott. These statements are false and could induce hostile and disagreeable opinions and feelings against me and stigmatize me and decrease the respect, regard and confidence in which I am held. The false statements by Scott about my character are:
A. That I am chasing people looking for trouble
B. That I have chosen 10derheart to bully
C. That I am truly a coward
D. That I should only know how low I truly am
E. That I am impervious to peer pressure and shame
F. That I am "crying wolf".
Many of you already know that I am here to show you what has been revealed to me that could make you free from depression and addiction. And you could have a new heart, a new spirit and you could sing a new song. And many of you already know that I am prevented from posting here what I need to post to you so that you could know this for yourself due to the prohibitions posted to me here by Mr. Hsiung.
And many of you already know that I am attempting to purge the anti-Semitic statements here, and the hate that goes along with those statements being seen by a subset of readers as conducive to the civic harmony and welfare of this community and supportive and will be good for this community as a whole due to the fact that Mr. Hsiung has posted that unsanctioned statements could be seen as supportive. That could induce a mind-set into a subset of readers to post more of the same, thinking that statements that put down Jews and those of other faiths are supportive even though Mr Hsiung's TOS states not to post what could put down those of other faiths.
But it is much more than this. The statements that I am responding to are a great part of what constitutes humiliating and ridiculing a person. There are a subset of readers that come here in depression via a search that could see these type of statements that I am trying to get purged from here and be humiliated themselves when they read such because the statements are unsanctioned and then some readers could think that those statements are supportive and drive the one deeper into depression so that they commit suicide as seeing that the libel could be thought to be validated by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record since they stand unsanctioned.
You see, the mind makes short cuts and when one reads what is in this post by Scott against me, and that there could be the thinking that Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record are ratifying the libel against me since the libel stands, that could IMHO create a downward vortex of depression in a subset of readers to find themselves helpless and have no way out of the depression and then kill themselves. This is compounded by the fact that there is evidence that the drugs promoted here can increase suicidal thinking.
Yet today, I am depicted here as one "crying wolf" about what Scott writes in another post of his against me concerning statements here that are anti-Semitic, where I am in discussion with Mr Hsiung and have already brought out several posts that are plainly visible that put down Jews that he has posted to show some type of repudiation of the anti-Semitism in the post as a result of our discussion. It is a false statement that I am crying wolf, for there are still years of statements that I want Mr. Hsiung to address that put down Jews and those of other faiths as well.
There is a great danger here that I want to reveal to readers here. It involves what Scott has written about me here but there is much more that I am prevented from posting here due to the prohibitions posted to me here by Mr. Hsiung, and that fact that readers could see me in a false light as seeing that libel against me is (redacted by respondent) and will in no wise (redacted by respondent), for it has been revealed to me that as the sun comes out of the East and sets in the West, so shall the hatred that you can see thrown at me here come back to not only those that cast those stones, but to those that are in concert with them as well.
Lou


 

Lou's response-kriwuf SLS

Posted by Lou Pilder on January 6, 2014, at 20:46:43

In reply to Coward. Lou Pilder, posted by SLS on January 20, 2013, at 14:08:15

> > > ****
> >
> > 10_
> > I am unsure as to what your purpose, if any, is in relation to what you posted here. If you could post your rationale for posting what you have here, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly. If you are going to take the position of being unable/unwilling or something else for not posting a response to my request here, could you post somewthing else in relation to ruling out that what you posted has nothing to do with the purpose of this forum as that faith is the subject?
> > Lou
>
> Look, Pilder. This is not a game. Stop chasing people looking for trouble. I don't know why you have chosen 10derHeart to bully, but you are truly a coward for doing so. I think it is about time for you to spend more time working on your own character than to attack the character of others. Coward.
>
> I truly hope that you feel put down. You should only know how low you truly are. I am sure that you won't feel put down, though, as you are impervious to peer pressure and shame.
>
> If you are not a bully, then you are surely paranoid that you should worry so much about someone's posting "****". Perhaps you should revisit psychiatric treatment. Feel free to respond to this post. Also, feel free to report this post to the administrators of this forum. If Dr. Hsiung does decide to intervene (which I hope he does), it is inevitable that you will be blocked from posting on Psycho-Babble should you not change your posting behavior. Of course, I will be blocked, too, but I don't really mind.
>
> Also, stop crying wolf. When a true wolf shows up, no one will want to hear or believe your cries.
>
>
> - Scott

Friends,
The statement written here against me by Scott are false and could induce hostile and disagreeable feelings against me and decrease the respect, regard and confidence in which I am held.
They statements by Scott that libel me could stigmatize me and place me in a false light.

 

Lou's response-kriwuf-B

Posted by Lou Pilder on January 6, 2014, at 20:55:55

In reply to Lou's response-kriwuf SLS, posted by Lou Pilder on January 6, 2014, at 20:46:43

> > > > ****
> > >
> > > 10_
> > > I am unsure as to what your purpose, if any, is in relation to what you posted here. If you could post your rationale for posting what you have here, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly. If you are going to take the position of being unable/unwilling or something else for not posting a response to my request here, could you post somewthing else in relation to ruling out that what you posted has nothing to do with the purpose of this forum as that faith is the subject?
> > > Lou
> >
> > Look, Pilder. This is not a game. Stop chasing people looking for trouble. I don't know why you have chosen 10derHeart to bully, but you are truly a coward for doing so. I think it is about time for you to spend more time working on your own character than to attack the character of others. Coward.
> >
> > I truly hope that you feel put down. You should only know how low you truly are. I am sure that you won't feel put down, though, as you are impervious to peer pressure and shame.
> >
> > If you are not a bully, then you are surely paranoid that you should worry so much about someone's posting "****". Perhaps you should revisit psychiatric treatment. Feel free to respond to this post. Also, feel free to report this post to the administrators of this forum. If Dr. Hsiung does decide to intervene (which I hope he does), it is inevitable that you will be blocked from posting on Psycho-Babble should you not change your posting behavior. Of course, I will be blocked, too, but I don't really mind.
> >
> > Also, stop crying wolf. When a true wolf shows up, no one will want to hear or believe your cries.
> >
> >
> > - Scott
>
> Friends,
> The statement written here against me by Scott are false and could induce hostile and disagreeable feelings against me and decrease the respect, regard and confidence in which I am held.
> They statements by Scott that libel me could stigmatize me and place me in a false light.
> Now the false light is a light that portrays me as some one that

 

An apology? Lou Pilder

Posted by SLS on January 7, 2014, at 8:17:42

In reply to Lou's response-kriwuf-B, posted by Lou Pilder on January 6, 2014, at 20:55:55

"Now you have two things that can be combined. The {nada} means {nothing}. Then we couple the 4 stars with {nothing}.
So one logical conclusion could be that the 4 stars are {nothing}. That may not be known to you as what that could mean, and unless the poster replies to my request for clarficaton, I see what can be seen.
You see, the 4 stars are 6-pointed stars. The Star of David. And posted on the faith forum. Nothing?"

What are your conclusions? What do you see?

Looking back on this post and the accusations toward 10derheart that they imply, do you come to the same conclusions now as you did then?

Would you like to apologize to 10derheart?


- Scott


This is the end of the thread.


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Faith | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.