Psycho-Babble Administration Thread 1093011

Shown: posts 1 to 6 of 6. This is the beginning of the thread.

 

Re: Lou's reply- three-post rule Lou Pilder

Posted by Tabitha on November 8, 2016, at 13:20:07

In reply to Lou's reply- SLS, posted by Lou Pilder on November 8, 2016, at 8:20:12

> > Please limit the number of consecutive posts as per this website's guidelines. Thank you.
> >
> >
> > - Scott
> >
> > _____________________________________
> >
> >
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#three
> >
> > "Can I post as much as I want?
> >
> > Please share this site with others by not starting more than 3 consecutive threads on the same board or posting more than 3 consecutive follow-ups in the same thread. More than that may discourage less confident posters from joining in. Giving them more of a chance makes it easier for them also to help -- and to feel good about doing so.
> >
> > There are exceptions to every rule, and those to this one may include:
> >
> > Responding to earlier posts one at a time.
> >
> > Playing around with others at Psycho-Babble Social.
> >
> > During meltdowns, clarifying posts many times.
> >
> > Keeping a diary."
>
> Scott,
> Review the rule and you will see that your accusation against me here is erroneous.

Lou,
Your previous three posts are not responding one at a time to earlier posts, are not playing around on Social babble, and are not a diary, so are you saying that you are having a meltdown? If not, then why would you say the three-post reminder is erroneous?

 

Lou's reply- three-post rule-pholugh uhpp Tabitha

Posted by Lou Pilder on November 9, 2016, at 16:14:30

In reply to Re: Lou's reply- three-post rule Lou Pilder, posted by Tabitha on November 8, 2016, at 13:20:07

> > > Please limit the number of consecutive posts as per this website's guidelines. Thank you.
> > >
> > >
> > > - Scott
> > >
> > > _____________________________________
> > >
> > >
> > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#three
> > >
> > > "Can I post as much as I want?
> > >
> > > Please share this site with others by not starting more than 3 consecutive threads on the same board or posting more than 3 consecutive follow-ups in the same thread. More than that may discourage less confident posters from joining in. Giving them more of a chance makes it easier for them also to help -- and to feel good about doing so.
> > >
> > > There are exceptions to every rule, and those to this one may include:
> > >
> > > Responding to earlier posts one at a time.
> > >
> > > Playing around with others at Psycho-Babble Social.
> > >
> > > During meltdowns, clarifying posts many times.
> > >
> > > Keeping a diary."
> >
> > Scott,
> > Review the rule and you will see that your accusation against me here is erroneous.
>
> Lou,
> Your previous three posts are not responding one at a time to earlier posts, are not playing around on Social babble, and are not a diary, so are you saying that you are having a meltdown? If not, then why would you say the three-post reminder is erroneous?
>
Tabitha,
The rule is that no more than 3 consecutive {follow ups}.
A correction is not a follow up.
Lou

 

Re: Lou's reply- three-post rule-pholugh uhpp Lou Pilder

Posted by Tabitha on November 9, 2016, at 23:09:20

In reply to Lou's reply- three-post rule-pholugh uhpp Tabitha, posted by Lou Pilder on November 9, 2016, at 16:14:30

> Tabitha,
> The rule is that no more than 3 consecutive {follow ups}.
> A correction is not a follow up.
> Lou
>

Huh. Seems like you're adding something to the rule that isn't there. Consider:

1) Every time you post in a thread, you are hitting a button that says "Post follow-up" in a section of the page titled "Post a new follow-up". There is no distinction between a follow-up and a "correction" post. They're all follow-ups.

2) Looks like you posted more than three times in a row, even if you don't count the "correction" posts. Oops.

 

Lou's reply-the catcher in the rule Tabitha

Posted by Lou Pilder on November 11, 2016, at 16:53:12

In reply to Re: Lou's reply- three-post rule-pholugh uhpp Lou Pilder, posted by Tabitha on November 9, 2016, at 23:09:20

> > Tabitha,
> > The rule is that no more than 3 consecutive {follow ups}.
> > A correction is not a follow up.
> > Lou
> >
>
> Huh. Seems like you're adding something to the rule that isn't there. Consider:
>
> 1) Every time you post in a thread, you are hitting a button that says "Post follow-up" in a section of the page titled "Post a new follow-up". There is no distinction between a follow-up and a "correction" post. They're all follow-ups.
>
> 2) Looks like you posted more than three times in a row, even if you don't count the "correction" posts. Oops.
>
> Tabatha,
I am unsure as to what is driving you to obsess here about the rule. If you could post answers to the following, then I could respond accordingly.
True or False:
I am dwelling on this here about the rule, Lou, because if I am successful,
A.I can stigmatize you here, Lou, as a rule-breaker.
B. I can show that you are an inferior human being, Lou
C. I can decrease the respect and regard for you here and induce hostile and disagreeable opinions and feelings toward you.
D. I can blame you for people getting addicted to the drugs promoted here because by you breaking the rule, people will have to take benzos.
E. I can show that this site is a farce because it allows you to post here, Lou.
Lou

 

The catcher in the rule Lou Pilder

Posted by SLS on November 11, 2016, at 18:59:18

In reply to Lou's reply-the catcher in the rule Tabitha, posted by Lou Pilder on November 11, 2016, at 16:53:12

I am unsure as to what you want to know from Tabitha.

Do you think that you were following the website rules regarding a 3-post limit?

1. Yes.

2. No.

Your answer to this question should help to produce a framework within which to discuss the matter further.

Thank you.


- Scott

 

three post rule

Posted by Horse on November 16, 2016, at 19:01:06

In reply to Lou's reply-the catcher in the rule Tabitha, posted by Lou Pilder on November 11, 2016, at 16:53:12

>D. I can blame you for people getting addicted to the drugs promoted here because by you breaking the rule, people will have to take benzos.

I'm enjoying the irony.


This is the end of the thread.


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.