Psycho-Babble Administration Thread 1082523

Shown: posts 31 to 55 of 102. Go back in thread:

 

More retractions? Lou Pilder

Posted by SLS on September 18, 2015, at 6:21:58

In reply to Lou's reply-judge not SLS, posted by Lou Pilder on September 17, 2015, at 13:39:27

Are there any words that you would like to retract?


- Scott

 

Lou's reply-where it is originally posted SLS

Posted by Lou Pilder on September 18, 2015, at 9:19:26

In reply to Retraction. Lou Pilder, posted by SLS on September 18, 2015, at 6:20:35

> I wrote this:
>
> "> Save yourself first. Jewish people convert to Christianity all the time."
>
> On their own, these words to you are uncivil, despite my intention to have them be satire when taken in context. I guess this was not obvious. Satire itself can be uncivil. I therefore retract these words.
>
>
> - Scott

I would like retractions to be posted as linking to the post where what you are retracting is originally posted.
Lou

 

Retractions. Lou Pilder

Posted by SLS on September 18, 2015, at 9:57:45

In reply to Lou's reply-where it is originally posted SLS, posted by Lou Pilder on September 18, 2015, at 9:19:26

> I would like retractions to be posted as linking to the post where what you are retracting is originally posted.

I would like you to post one retraction along this thread as I have done. I would like you to retract your statements regarding my working in concert with Robert Hsiung, MD to promote drugs and antisemitism.

This is to be a negotiated series of retractions. I have begun the process of deescalation by posting the first retraction.


- Scott

 

Lou's reply-stop antisemitic propaganda SLS

Posted by Lou Pilder on September 18, 2015, at 10:07:08

In reply to More retractions? Lou Pilder, posted by SLS on September 18, 2015, at 6:21:58

> Are there any words that you would like to retract?
>
>
> - Scott

There are many retractions that if done, could stop Mr. Hsiung from allowing the hatred toward the Jews that could be fostered here by allowing the anti-Semitic propaganda to be seen here as supportive, and worse, that in Mr. Hsiung's thinking it will be good for his community as a whole for hatred toward the Jews to be allowed to be seen as civil by him.
Here is post that I would like for you to examine so that we could go from there.
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20150407/msgs/1078654.html

 

Lou'reply-link? SLS

Posted by Lou Pilder on September 18, 2015, at 10:12:29

In reply to Retractions. Lou Pilder, posted by SLS on September 18, 2015, at 9:57:45

> > I would like retractions to be posted as linking to the post where what you are retracting is originally posted.
>
> I would like you to post one retraction along this thread as I have done. I would like you to retract your statements regarding my working in concert with Robert Hsiung, MD to promote drugs and antisemitism.
>
> This is to be a negotiated series of retractions. I have begun the process of deescalation by posting the first retraction.
>
>
> - Scott

what is a link to that?
Lou

 

Here are two. There are more. Lou Pilder

Posted by SLS on September 18, 2015, at 10:43:34

In reply to Lou'reply-link? SLS, posted by Lou Pilder on September 18, 2015, at 10:12:29

> > > I would like retractions to be posted as linking to the post where what you are retracting is originally posted.
> >
> > I would like you to post one retraction along this thread as I have done. I would like you to retract your statements regarding my working in concert with Robert Hsiung, MD to promote drugs and antisemitism.
> >
> > This is to be a negotiated series of retractions. I have begun the process of deescalation by posting the first retraction.
> >
> >
> > - Scott
>
> what is a link to that?
> Lou

http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20150806/msgs/1081320.html

http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20150901/msgs/1082178.html

There are more.

I have complied with your request. However, it is not my intention to labor through negotiations without your posting a retraction to the links I have provided here.


- Scott

 

Lou's reply-a modification SLS

Posted by Lou Pilder on September 18, 2015, at 14:58:32

In reply to Here are two. There are more. Lou Pilder, posted by SLS on September 18, 2015, at 10:43:34

Scott,
Here is one way. Would that satisfy you?
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20150901/msgs/1082654.html

 

Mission accomplished. Lou Pilder

Posted by SLS on September 18, 2015, at 15:23:23

In reply to Lou's reply-a modification SLS, posted by Lou Pilder on September 18, 2015, at 14:58:32

> Scott,
> Here is one way. Would that satisfy you?
> Lou
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20150901/msgs/1082654.html

No. Of course not.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/concert?s=t

No further negotiations will occur with you at this time.

I have accomplished my goal.

:-)


- Scott

 

Lou's reply-advertiaing the drug

Posted by Lou Pilder on September 18, 2015, at 15:28:09

In reply to Lou's reply-a modification SLS, posted by Lou Pilder on September 18, 2015, at 14:58:32

> Scott,
> Here is one way. Would that satisfy you?
> Lou
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20150901/msgs/1082654.html

Scott,
I have read your 2end link and the part in question is:
[...advertising the drug through Scott..].
Now that is not what has to do with being in concert, for you would have to be proven in discovery that you collaborated via email or such to do that. I do not think Mr. Hsiung would go to that extreme for he just has to let posters promote drugs here without being in compliance with the FDA rules and do nothing. And he would not need you if that was what his goal was.
Lou

 

Lou's reply-not worthy of equal citizenship

Posted by Lou Pilder on September 19, 2015, at 6:27:34

In reply to Lou's reply-a modification SLS, posted by Lou Pilder on September 18, 2015, at 14:58:32

> Scott,
> Here is one way. Would that satisfy you?
> Lou
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20150901/msgs/1082654.html

Friends,
I think that you will do well to consider what is plainly visible here. You see, I am trying not only to save lives here, but also to stop Mr. Hsiung and Scott, and there are others also, from posting what I understand to be hate-speech. This is in particular, but not limited to defamation directed against me and the Jews. This is because of the effects of this type of hate being allowed to be seen here as supportive by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record, and thus the real issue is what could be done to the vulnerable people here who are subject to hatred directed at them, being the Jews and others here.
The harm that could come to the recipients of the hate being allowed to be seen as civil here by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record is that those discriminated upon here by Mr. Hsiung allowing hatred to be posted against them with impunity damages the person's self-worth as they can not count on being treated justly. They can have feelings that they are deemed to be not worthy of equal citizenship. The stereotyping and stigmatization that comes from the group- hate propaganda being allowed here to be seen as supportive, and in Mr. Hsiung's thinking be good for his community as a whole, can shape a vulnerable person that is the victim of this hate here to feel that their social image and reputation are so devalued that they could kill themselves. I am trying so hard to not to let Scott and Mr. Hsiung and the others that post hatred and anti-Semitic propaganda against me here with impunity, to stay here in order to help others from being the recipients of this on-line hatred being perpetrated here as "support", which is not a new thing, but an old tactic that is socially dangerous that could lead to a person killing themselves by having feelings of inferiority induced into them by seeing that anti-Semitism is considered to be supportive and will be good for this community as a whole according to the psychiatrist's thinking.
I would like for you to read all of the following and then I intend to expose the hidden hatred here being allowed to be seen as civil, providing the rule of 3 does not apply.
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20150407/msgs/1078958.html

 

Lou's reply-denial of equal protection

Posted by Lou Pilder on September 19, 2015, at 9:25:21

In reply to Lou's reply-not worthy of equal citizenship, posted by Lou Pilder on September 19, 2015, at 6:27:34

> > Scott,
> > Here is one way. Would that satisfy you?
> > Lou
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20150901/msgs/1082654.html
>
> Friends,
> I think that you will do well to consider what is plainly visible here. You see, I am trying not only to save lives here, but also to stop Mr. Hsiung and Scott, and there are others also, from posting what I understand to be hate-speech. This is in particular, but not limited to defamation directed against me and the Jews. This is because of the effects of this type of hate being allowed to be seen here as supportive by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record, and thus the real issue is what could be done to the vulnerable people here who are subject to hatred directed at them, being the Jews and others here.
> The harm that could come to the recipients of the hate being allowed to be seen as civil here by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record is that those discriminated upon here by Mr. Hsiung allowing hatred to be posted against them with impunity damages the person's self-worth as they can not count on being treated justly. They can have feelings that they are deemed to be not worthy of equal citizenship. The stereotyping and stigmatization that comes from the group- hate propaganda being allowed here to be seen as supportive, and in Mr. Hsiung's thinking be good for his community as a whole, can shape a vulnerable person that is the victim of this hate here to feel that their social image and reputation are so devalued that they could kill themselves. I am trying so hard to not to let Scott and Mr. Hsiung and the others that post hatred and anti-Semitic propaganda against me here with impunity, to stay here in order to help others from being the recipients of this on-line hatred being perpetrated here as "support", which is not a new thing, but an old tactic that is socially dangerous that could lead to a person killing themselves by having feelings of inferiority induced into them by seeing that anti-Semitism is considered to be supportive and will be good for this community as a whole according to the psychiatrist's thinking.
> I would like for you to read all of the following and then I intend to expose the hidden hatred here being allowed to be seen as civil, providing the rule of 3 does not apply.
> Lou
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20150407/msgs/1078958.html

Friends,
The harm that could be inflicted upon me here by me being denied equal protection of Mr. Hsiung's rules, is well-documented in the psychological literature that you can look up. And here, I am being called names, names that could mark the difference between life and death in vulnerable people, but I have a shield that protects me from hate being thrown at me by the posters here, but I do not have a shield from being hit from behind. And the allowing of me being called names here by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record, is what is causing the emotional pain that I am being subjected to here. It is that I am made to feel unworthy of receiving equal protection of Mr. Hsiung's rules here. And since he allows me to be subjected to defamatory names here, the defamation can continue to cause me emotional distress as not being worthy of equal protection of the rules here, which is discrimination being allowed by a psychiatrist saying that he justifies what he does because it will in his thinking be good for his community as a whole. That IMHHHHO is hitting me from behind and I can not stop that.
Here is where I a hit from behind as Mr. Hsiung allows me to feel put down by Scott which could show a subset of readers that Scott and Mr .Hsiung are in concert with each other to inflict emotional distress upon me. They could have a rational basis to think that because Scott calls me a coward, which is against the rules, and Mr. Hsiung allows him to do so without his tag line to be civil which allows Scott to do it again.
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faith/20101230/msgs/1035879.html

 

Lous response-What constitutes antisemitism on PB herpills

Posted by Lou Pilder on September 20, 2015, at 7:14:51

In reply to There is no anti-semitism on PBabble (nm) Lou Pilder, posted by herpills on September 17, 2015, at 18:02:46

h_p
Would you consider that the definition of what constitutes anti-Semitism is that if something is posted here that puts down Judaism and is allowed to be seen as civil and supportive and will in Mr. Hsiung's thinking be good for this community as a whole to be seen that way, that the statement that qualifies as putting down Judaism is then an anti-Semitic statement and that if it is allowed then there is anti-Semitism on PBabble?
Lou

 

Lou's reply-denial of equal protection-hecudoituyu

Posted by Lou Pilder on September 21, 2015, at 10:37:03

In reply to Lou's reply-denial of equal protection, posted by Lou Pilder on September 19, 2015, at 9:25:21

> > > Scott,
> > > Here is one way. Would that satisfy you?
> > > Lou
> > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20150901/msgs/1082654.html
> >
> > Friends,
> > I think that you will do well to consider what is plainly visible here. You see, I am trying not only to save lives here, but also to stop Mr. Hsiung and Scott, and there are others also, from posting what I understand to be hate-speech. This is in particular, but not limited to defamation directed against me and the Jews. This is because of the effects of this type of hate being allowed to be seen here as supportive by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record, and thus the real issue is what could be done to the vulnerable people here who are subject to hatred directed at them, being the Jews and others here.
> > The harm that could come to the recipients of the hate being allowed to be seen as civil here by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record is that those discriminated upon here by Mr. Hsiung allowing hatred to be posted against them with impunity damages the person's self-worth as they can not count on being treated justly. They can have feelings that they are deemed to be not worthy of equal citizenship. The stereotyping and stigmatization that comes from the group- hate propaganda being allowed here to be seen as supportive, and in Mr. Hsiung's thinking be good for his community as a whole, can shape a vulnerable person that is the victim of this hate here to feel that their social image and reputation are so devalued that they could kill themselves. I am trying so hard to not to let Scott and Mr. Hsiung and the others that post hatred and anti-Semitic propaganda against me here with impunity, to stay here in order to help others from being the recipients of this on-line hatred being perpetrated here as "support", which is not a new thing, but an old tactic that is socially dangerous that could lead to a person killing themselves by having feelings of inferiority induced into them by seeing that anti-Semitism is considered to be supportive and will be good for this community as a whole according to the psychiatrist's thinking.
> > I would like for you to read all of the following and then I intend to expose the hidden hatred here being allowed to be seen as civil, providing the rule of 3 does not apply.
> > Lou
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20150407/msgs/1078958.html
>
> Friends,
> The harm that could be inflicted upon me here by me being denied equal protection of Mr. Hsiung's rules, is well-documented in the psychological literature that you can look up. And here, I am being called names, names that could mark the difference between life and death in vulnerable people, but I have a shield that protects me from hate being thrown at me by the posters here, but I do not have a shield from being hit from behind. And the allowing of me being called names here by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record, is what is causing the emotional pain that I am being subjected to here. It is that I am made to feel unworthy of receiving equal protection of Mr. Hsiung's rules here. And since he allows me to be subjected to defamatory names here, the defamation can continue to cause me emotional distress as not being worthy of equal protection of the rules here, which is discrimination being allowed by a psychiatrist saying that he justifies what he does because it will in his thinking be good for his community as a whole. That IMHHHHO is hitting me from behind and I can not stop that.
> Here is where I a hit from behind as Mr. Hsiung allows me to feel put down by Scott which could show a subset of readers that Scott and Mr .Hsiung are in concert with each other to inflict emotional distress upon me. They could have a rational basis to think that because Scott calls me a coward, which is against the rules, and Mr. Hsiung allows him to do so without his tag line to be civil which allows Scott to do it again.
> Lou
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faith/20101230/msgs/1035879.html
>

Friends,
The denial by Mr. Hsiung of me having the equal protection of his rules extends to him allowing many others here to post defamation against me here with impunity. Here is another member being allowed to post with impunity what is plainly visible to be against his rules.
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20150806/msgs/1081470.html
To understand the depth of how this statement against my character could cause emotional distress to me is not because of what the poster says about me here with impunity, but the fact that Mr. Hsiung is allowing it which denies me equal protection of his rules which demeans me to think that I am unworthy of being an equal member in this community, which could make me into a pariah and stigmatize me when Mr. Hsiung could have prevented it. This subjects me to extreme emotional distress that if he was to do this to a more vulnerable member here, that IMHO could lead them to kill themselves.
I am trying to stop Mr. Hsiung from allowing third-party members to post contemptuous messages with impunity in order to insure that he does not allow it to be done to you. For if he succeeds in allowing hatred to be seen as supportive against me, he could do it to you also.
Lou

 

There is no anti-semitism on PBabble (nm) Lou Pilder

Posted by herpills on September 21, 2015, at 12:00:06

In reply to Lous response-What constitutes antisemitism on PB herpills, posted by Lou Pilder on September 20, 2015, at 7:14:51

 

Only obsessive hyper-vigilance (nm)

Posted by Toph on September 22, 2015, at 12:40:37

In reply to There is no anti-semitism on PBabble (nm) Lou Pilder, posted by herpills on September 21, 2015, at 12:00:06

 

Truth. (nm) Toph

Posted by 10derheart on September 22, 2015, at 14:45:59

In reply to Only obsessive hyper-vigilance (nm), posted by Toph on September 22, 2015, at 12:40:37

 

Agreed (nm) 10derheart

Posted by ClearSkies on September 22, 2015, at 19:08:25

In reply to Truth. (nm) Toph, posted by 10derheart on September 22, 2015, at 14:45:59

 

Lou's response-create and develop antisemitic hate Toph

Posted by Lou Pilder on September 28, 2015, at 11:12:21

In reply to Only obsessive hyper-vigilance (nm), posted by Toph on September 22, 2015, at 12:40:37

Friends,
The subject line that I am responding to here claims that there is no anti-Semitism here, {only}obsessive hyper vigilance. The use of {only} is a substantiation of the post that the poster that I am responding to, ratifies the statement, {there is no anti-Semitism here}.
Antisemitism generally means {against the Jew} or promote lies about the Jews. Here, Mr. Hsiung states that if a statement puts down or accuses Jews, or insults their faith or puts down a Jew for having the faith of Judaism, then those type of statements are anti-Semitic statements. This can manifest itself in many ways here. One way is simply to allow anti-Semitic propaganda to be seen as being supportive by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record where it is originally posted. That means according to Mr. Hsiung, that it will be good for his community as a whole for anti-Semitism to be seen as being supportive where those types of statement are posted originally. Now we have something way beyond just having an owner of a public internet site allowing antisemitic propaganda. Now we have what can be seen as that owner and his deputies of record validating and ratifying that anti-Semitism will be good for his community as a whole. This opens not just a forest fire of hate toward the Jews, but a wildfire that can be spread through the winds of the internet into homes all over the world, and where those embers land, no body knows. But there are subsets of people waiting for a psychiatrist to support hatred toward the Jews and the furnace of hate could be stoked intensely in those people to act out violence and prejudice against the Jews in their community. And their could be {easily swayed people} that are {less confident} of what they believe about the Jews an adopt the psychiatrist's view that anti-Semitic propaganda will be good for his community as a whole and they could then think it will be good for their community also. For a psychiatrist's endorsement carries a huge weight in advertising. And for anti-Semitism here to be seen as supportive by a psychiatrist, that could lead vulnerable readers that are ignorant of Judaism to see as anti-Semitism is being advocated, which makes it an advertisement and an endorsement unchecked by The American Psychiatrist Association, The Justice Department, The AMA, The University of Chicago, and anyone else that could have an interest in allowing a psychiatrist to allow anti-Semitic hate to be seen as being supportive in his community.
Antisemitism could be a fire of hate in a community by denying a Jew equal protection of the rules. This shows that this community could lead members to be repulsed by Mr. Hsiung denying me the equal protection of his rules by not responding to years of notifications by me and left this community leaving those that accept or deny that anti-Semitic propaganda is being allowed by Mr. Hsiung to be seen as supportive. Years of notifications that if acted on could have had the anti-Semitic propaganda from being allowed to stand because those statements would have been addressed so that I could respond to whatever action Mr. Hsiung would have taken and I think that lives could have been saved.
The people left here that will not show that they want the anti-Semitic propaganda purged from here, could be seen by a subset of examiners of this site to be in concert with Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record to allow to create and develop antisemitic hate to come from here simply by being indifferent. Antisemitism historically had what is known as {bystander indifference} to allow those in charge to have an easy way to create an develop anti-Semitism in their community.
Lou

 

Re: Agreed

Posted by Lamdage22 on September 28, 2015, at 13:09:16

In reply to Agreed (nm) 10derheart, posted by ClearSkies on September 22, 2015, at 19:08:25

Fun times on the admin board =)

 

Support or condemnation by Dr. Bob: We can't know. Lou Pilder

Posted by SLS on September 28, 2015, at 17:58:40

In reply to Lou's response-create and develop antisemitic hate Toph, posted by Lou Pilder on September 28, 2015, at 11:12:21

Any extant, unequivocal antisemitism should not be tolerated. Unfortunately, Dr. Hsiung has been quiet for a long time. I think it is reasonable to act under the assumption that he is absent, and is neither supporting nor condemning verbiage that you consider to be antisemitic. In other words, we cannot know what his decisions will be until he is present and interacting. If and when Dr. Hsiung reappears, perhaps you can then resume your discourse with him regarding your concerns.


- Scott

 

Lou's response-stop hate being seen as supportive SLS

Posted by Lou Pilder on September 28, 2015, at 21:08:51

In reply to Support or condemnation by Dr. Bob: We can't know. Lou Pilder, posted by SLS on September 28, 2015, at 17:58:40

> Any extant, unequivocal antisemitism should not be tolerated. Unfortunately, Dr. Hsiung has been quiet for a long time. I think it is reasonable to act under the assumption that he is absent, and is neither supporting nor condemning verbiage that you consider to be antisemitic. In other words, we cannot know what his decisions will be until he is present and interacting. If and when Dr. Hsiung reappears, perhaps you can then resume your discourse with him regarding your concerns.
>
>
> - Scott

Friends,
We do know. For Mr. Hsiung states that he does what in his thinking will be good for this community as a whole and worse, if a statement that is not supportive is allowed to be seen as being supportive by him, for support takes precedence, by allowing it to be seen that way it will be good for his community as a whole, as he thinks.
As long as the statements that put down/accuse Jews or insult Judaism are allowed to be seen as supportive here, more and more readers could be inflicted with antismitic hate, by seeing that a psychiatrist allows anti-Semitic propaganda to stand which could lead vulnerable people to adopt Mr. Hsiung's thinking and carry that hate to their community and even act out the hate by committing anti-Semitic violence. This can in particular reinforce some to commit hate crimes as those here could be drugged to the point where the drugs induce the state th they want to kill themselves and others.
Let there be no misunderstanding here. If Mr. Hsiung wants to be absent here, I think that he has an obligation to appoint someone in his place to stop hate from being seen as being supportive and worse, that it will be good for this community as a whole in Mr. Hsiung's thinking.
Lou

 

Tiresome and boring (nm)

Posted by 10derheart on September 28, 2015, at 23:10:46

In reply to Re: Agreed, posted by Lamdage22 on September 28, 2015, at 13:09:16

 

Lou's response-hate being seen as supportive

Posted by Lou Pilder on September 29, 2015, at 7:09:11

In reply to Lou's response-stop hate being seen as supportive SLS, posted by Lou Pilder on September 28, 2015, at 21:08:51

> > Any extant, unequivocal antisemitism should not be tolerated. Unfortunately, Dr. Hsiung has been quiet for a long time. I think it is reasonable to act under the assumption that he is absent, and is neither supporting nor condemning verbiage that you consider to be antisemitic. In other words, we cannot know what his decisions will be until he is present and interacting. If and when Dr. Hsiung reappears, perhaps you can then resume your discourse with him regarding your concerns.
> >
> >
> > - Scott
>
> Friends,
> We do know. For Mr. Hsiung states that he does what in his thinking will be good for this community as a whole and worse, if a statement that is not supportive is allowed to be seen as being supportive by him, for support takes precedence, by allowing it to be seen that way it will be good for his community as a whole, as he thinks.
> As long as the statements that put down/accuse Jews or insult Judaism are allowed to be seen as supportive here, more and more readers could be inflicted with antismitic hate, by seeing that a psychiatrist allows anti-Semitic propaganda to stand which could lead vulnerable people to adopt Mr. Hsiung's thinking and carry that hate to their community and even act out the hate by committing anti-Semitic violence. This can in particular reinforce some to commit hate crimes as those here could be drugged to the point where the drugs induce the state th they want to kill themselves and others.
> Let there be no misunderstanding here. If Mr. Hsiung wants to be absent here, I think that he has an obligation to appoint someone in his place to stop hate from being seen as being supportive and worse, that it will be good for this community as a whole in Mr. Hsiung's thinking.
> Lou

Friends,
Let us look at these posts.ou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140304/msgs/1065631.html
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140304/msgs/1065801.html
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140304/msgs/1066804html
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140304/msgs/1066900.html

 

correction response-hate being seen as supportive-

Posted by Lou Pilder on September 29, 2015, at 7:24:26

In reply to Lou's response-hate being seen as supportive, posted by Lou Pilder on September 29, 2015, at 7:09:11

> > > Any extant, unequivocal antisemitism should not be tolerated. Unfortunately, Dr. Hsiung has been quiet for a long time. I think it is reasonable to act under the assumption that he is absent, and is neither supporting nor condemning verbiage that you consider to be antisemitic. In other words, we cannot know what his decisions will be until he is present and interacting. If and when Dr. Hsiung reappears, perhaps you can then resume your discourse with him regarding your concerns.
> > >
> > >
> > > - Scott
> >
> > Friends,
> > We do know. For Mr. Hsiung states that he does what in his thinking will be good for this community as a whole and worse, if a statement that is not supportive is allowed to be seen as being supportive by him, for support takes precedence, by allowing it to be seen that way it will be good for his community as a whole, as he thinks.
> > As long as the statements that put down/accuse Jews or insult Judaism are allowed to be seen as supportive here, more and more readers could be inflicted with antismitic hate, by seeing that a psychiatrist allows anti-Semitic propaganda to stand which could lead vulnerable people to adopt Mr. Hsiung's thinking and carry that hate to their community and even act out the hate by committing anti-Semitic violence. This can in particular reinforce some to commit hate crimes as those here could be drugged to the point where the drugs induce the state th they want to kill themselves and others.
> > Let there be no misunderstanding here. If Mr. Hsiung wants to be absent here, I think that he has an obligation to appoint someone in his place to stop hate from being seen as being supportive and worse, that it will be good for this community as a whole in Mr. Hsiung's thinking.
> > Lou
>
> Friends,
> Let us look at these posts.ou
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140304/msgs/1065631.html
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140304/msgs/1065801.html
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140304/msgs/1066804html
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140304/msgs/1066900.html

correction:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140304/msgs/1066804.html

 

Lou's response- 10derheart

Posted by Lou Pilder on September 29, 2015, at 7:38:25

In reply to Tiresome and boring (nm), posted by 10derheart on September 28, 2015, at 23:10:46

10,
You wrote [,..tiresome and boring...].
Were you a deputy when this was posted here? What is your point to post such a remark when I am trying to stop hate from being seen here as supportive here by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record?
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20120228/msgs/1032026.html


Go forward in thread:


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.