Psycho-Babble Psychology | about psychological treatments | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: therapy debate gets 'raucous' badhaircut

Posted by fires on August 11, 2004, at 20:47:44

In reply to therapy debate gets 'raucous', posted by badhaircut on August 11, 2004, at 10:05:32

> According to an article in Tuesday's New York Times, psychologists had a conference on the effectiveness of interpersonal psychotherapy that was more like a "civil war" at the APA's annual meeting 12 days ago.
>
> -quote-
> The issue of which therapies are based on science and which are not has recently become [very] divisive....
>
> The topic was debated before a raucous, packed hall at the annual meetings of the American Psychological Association in Honolulu, held July 28 to Aug. 1. ... "The split in the field is bigger than it ever has ever been," said Dr. Drew Westen.... "The intensity of the acrimony, the distaste, has never been so high."
>
> At bottom, the dispute is over the nature of psychotherapy: Is it an intuitive process, more art than science? Or is it more a matter of a therapist following specific procedures that reliably help people get better?
> -unquote-
>
> Participants expect the controversy to keep getting bigger.
>
> You can read the original article for the next week free at the NY Times site:
> http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/10/health/psychology/10ther.html
> After this week you have to pay to download it.
> Libraries should have hard-copy back issues (Aug 10, 2004: "For Psychotherapy's Claims, Skeptics Demand Proof" by Benedict Carey, New York Times).
>
> It may also be available online for free later at these sites:
> http://www.wilmingtonstar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040810/ZNYT04/408100368/1002/BUSINESS
> http://www.goupstate.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040810/ZNYT04/408100374/1051/news01
>
> -bhc

Thanks for the great link. Glad to see that some are now wanting proof that therapies work! Yes, it's about time. No truth, without proof.

A quote from my former MD, in his book, "Betrayal by the Brain, Jay A. Goldstein": p.181: "I am reminded of a two week period during my medical student psychiatry rotation when I was able to discuss every patient in the context of his/her oral impregnation fantasy. It took quit a while for my supervisors to realize that I was parodying the illusory certainty that contemporary psychiatric thinking provided. Scientifically generated hypothesis testing is much more rational and measurable, and more beneficial to patients."

bye


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Psychology | Framed

poster:fires thread:376384
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/psycho/20040805/msgs/376614.html