Psycho-Babble Psychology | about psychological treatments | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: therapy debate gets 'raucous' - Auntie Mel Shadowplayers721

Posted by Dinah on August 11, 2004, at 11:55:11

In reply to Re: therapy debate gets 'raucous', posted by Shadowplayers721 on August 11, 2004, at 11:26:54

The unknown factor is what would have happened without therapy. He can work. Would he be able to work without therapy? He can maintain a functional, if not optimal, place in society. Would he be able to do that without therapy? He pays taxes, doesn't need public assistance for shelter and food. Is therapy a more cost effective solution than the alternative?

I think the only fair way to judge therapy is to judge how *this* person would have done with and without therapy.

It wouldn't be fair to judge my therapy by the areas where I'm not well. It's a lot fairer to say "I'm alive. I hold down a more than half time job. I function pretty well as a mother, reasonably well as a wife. Without therapy, there would almost certainly have been suicide attempts, if not successes, hospitalizations, huge costs to my family and society. Maintenance therapy and maintenance medication is cheap in comparison to the alternative."




Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post

Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.


Start a new thread

Google www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Psychology | Framed

poster:Dinah thread:376384