Psycho-Babble Politics | about politics | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: the courts

Posted by alexandra_k on April 30, 2021, at 0:40:03

In reply to Re: the courts, posted by alexandra_k on April 30, 2021, at 0:30:51

i know there may be security camera footage.

there are certainly televisions up all around the show. pretty sure smart tvs don't just deliver tv to you... pretty sure they have the capacity to upload information...

i would be suprised indeed if there wasnt security camera footage inside the public (that is to say corridoors) of the hospital. even if not in individual rooms / wards.

i would be surprised indeed if there wasn't security camera footage of 4+ very large security guards called to outside my door physically pushing me back into a seclusion room. if it shows my face they can probably get a sign language interpretor to lip read my asking clearly and repeatedly for a lawyer and fo rthem to step aside and allow me to go about my lawful business.

the cameras will show the expressions on the faces of nursing staff and other clinicians.

the gloating. the smirking.

the... failure to make eye contacct from the security guards once i stated i was being unlawfully detained against my will and they were follling instrutions like nazi soldiors.

i'm sure it's there for the cameras.

what are you going to do about it?

what is new zealand going to do about it.

the judciary. the third branch of government.

the DHB hired a QC to file a motion to have my proeedings struck out on the grounds that dkjeowioiwehoilej it doesn't matter. the judge instructed me to revise the statement of claim because klhidhfoigdskfkjldsjfkld it needs to be longer apparently and only to assert thins that the DHB can defend itself against.

i said i needed the dhb to give me the file notes. where the people who write them take responsibiltiy for that. then i will be in the position to make specific allegations about violation of rights and i will be able to name parties responsible.

the judge said he didn't have juristiction to order them to hand over my file notes.


they won't appoint an amicus curiae. canada does that to self represented applicants. to ensure there is no misarriage of justice.

new zealadn refuses to get with the f*ck*ng programme.

there's nothing here.

no education.
no health
no legal


i really haven't seen any f*ck*ng inkling




Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post

Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.


Start a new thread

Google www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Politics | Framed

poster:alexandra_k thread:1114516