Psycho-Babble Social Thread 1120622

Shown: posts 1 to 6 of 6. This is the beginning of the thread.


maths salad

Posted by alexandra_k on September 7, 2022, at 16:18:58

when you see the word salad they make with English...

it does not matter what the laws of new zealand are -- they refuse to uphold them. word salad word salad word salad.

when Auckland University publishes a selection criterion for medicine with an algorithm for calculating GPA, UMAT / UCAT score, interview score and then applies it incorrectly and then refuses to apply it at all... The selection criterion that has been published is just word salad.

When the University of Waikato publishes Calender regulations as to how theses will be externally examined -- and then says that the outcome of 'first examination' is ALWAYS (decided by them, internally) that the student will be required to repeat the qualification and pay additional fees then the Calendar Regulations are word salad word salad word salad.

imagine the maths salad that there must be.

also. as well as. the maths salad that goes into supporting the word salad. the reason why they are so very determined that nobody can do maths except for people converging on the final solution.

count the number of people.

count the number of studnets enrolled in the detention camps up and down the land. the hosptials, the schools ,the tertiary education, the prisons, the aged care facilities... count the number of people who various manageers and administrators and mangaging administrators of the administrations managemetn of the word salad word salad word salad.

they get money (bounties on their heads) for recording how many people they have incapacitated and detained.

but i imagine that mostly the numbers are made up. entirely.

i mean to say the university of waikato recorded me as having been enrolled by the university in courses of study that i never aplied to be enrolle din.

so how many other 'students' are similarly figments of their imagination?

it's soooooooooooooo competitive.

there's nothing here.


Re: maths salad

Posted by alexandra_k on September 7, 2022, at 16:54:21

In reply to maths salad, posted by alexandra_k on September 7, 2022, at 16:18:58

they are getting closer. they are getting closer and closer and closer and closer and closer and closer and closer...

to giving up the pretense of doing or aiming to be anything different.

the auckland university of technology university (you have to say university twice because it was a very good polytech, by all accounts, but everybody knows that a polytech is just a second rate university and when a polytech gets to a certain state or stage of development it then becomes a university.

so now we have these vocational undergraduate degrees. like a bachelor of health science in... nursing. physiotherapy. things like that. medicine and law are both university subjects -- because they are handed to the children of the wealthy elite who don't get to go to the US or the UK or europe to the universities over there. i guess because their parents have closer control over what residential hall (and what tutors) and, increasingly, direct control over their grades in fact (when they bother to use their grades at all instead of making decisions on the basis of who their parents are).

there are quite the scummy scams going on with trades. with the local councils and the building consents and the like. things get delayed and they end up costing far in access because of the bribes and so on that you have to pay to the council in order to get the permits etc.

we are so corrupt we don't see any of this as corruption.

when the trade centre gets burned down 2x during it being built. when they try and blame an apprentice with a blowtorch. when the engineers of the blow torch point out that the tool has automatic shut off when you set it down so no apprentice can accidentally leave it on when it is not attended.

over and over again.

it's too corrupt here. there's actually nothing here.

the only trades peple whose qualifications they will acknowledge or recognise are ones who do what they are told when they are told. sign off when they are told. don't sigin off when they are told. word salad word salad word salad of the regulations.

my niece is apparently a radiologist. she did medical imaging. a bachelor of health science in medical imaging or something. a small course with only 6 of them or something. they picked her friend.. and then they eventually picked her to do it, too. so there aren't many of them. she was doing angio stuff. for the catheter lab, i think. when people have blood clots. heart attacks or whatever. the surgeon comes to drive the scope around. not sure what her role is exactly. so now she's studying at the university to do mri's. she said something about she could have done ultrasound... but the ultrasound medical imaging people write the reports. so they have to describe the ultrasound and diagnose. i suppose. on the basis of the ultrasound. but new zealand doesn't have any radiologists, i don't think... so likely she will end up writing the mri radiology reports. that the surgeons don't typically have before they get in there and have a go at surgery. because it's a fun thing for the great grandchild of the whoever to be doing. apparently. or i suppose.

my nephew got to start a phd at rutgers. after spending 2 years on a 1 year masters from university of auckland and then 2 years on a 2 year masters somewhere in texas. he's marrying someone who is in univerity administration and now she has a job in pittsburg somewhere so he got a place at rutgers. since he's marrying an administrator i guess he just might make it. perhaps. see how many screaming tantrums there is in 5 years when it's time to sign off on his PhD.

New Zealand has quite the relationship with Rutgers. I know quite a few who went there for Arts types of subjects. I guess it is because Princeton takes all the Turnitin submissions of the New Zealand Undergraduates and gets the professors on their staff or whatever their work so they can pass it off as their own and so on when it comes to their own publications.

I did end up making a website to put my own work on. Because I realise, now, that something like that is the likely expalnation for why they refuse to acknowledge anything about me at alll. They have taken my work and passed it off as thei rown. someone high up somewhere... Plagariser. I think that is the most likely explanation of why the Philosophy people are being such obnoxious *ssh*l*s when it comes to me not having credit for any of the work tkhat I have done in Philosohpy.

I mean... There is something about how psychopathy is when people keep going when the other party has surrendered. So, with dogs, when one dog rolls over and exposes it's belly it's waving the white flag. So when I say 'i wont' be applying for jobs in philosohpy I don't want a career as a sophist' they are supposed to chill the f*ck out and relax. It's okay. They can have it. They win the great competition. But they didn't chill the f*ck out and relax at all. They refused to give me credit for the work tkhat I had done. Someone or other said something to me in fact about how it didn't matter who did the work -- it only mattered who was credited as having done the work. I guess that tells you everything you need to know about the work that he's supposedly done...

Nobody was held dto account for WWII detention camp atrocities in NZ. THe officials never stopped.

There's nothing here. Up and down the land...

Nothing. Nada. Zip. Zilch. Zero.

People who have completed requirements for PhD and they won't give them the qualification. So they can't apply for skilled positions overseas and there isnt' a skilled position for them here.

THe people holding the positions were people selected when they were very very very very young on the basis of who their parents are. They know full well they would never make it through if they had to do what they demand of the next generation. That's why they have made it the way they have.

Their kids nad grandkids and so on are all expected to just go off and die so they can live their dream of being chief psychopath chief chief executive of the mangerial administration.

I suppose much of what you see in New Zealand are those medical experiments that the Ivy Leage Universities are runnin goversas because they won't have recourse to the US laws. I would imagine.

Radiation. How much cancer they can make. Etc.

That's why there aren't allowed to be any doctors etc here. Why trained people are not allowed to function. The only people allowed into the postiions are people who haven't been trained who will follow instructions or orders.

And that's why the people in these parts are all trained in how they are entirely replaceable and expendible. Their only value is in following orders.

There is a thing at the moment about not writing anything down. Not leaving a paper trail.

I was thinking.. Why? I mean you can audio record people's voice.

I guess it is because pepole are saying the side that technology is being used on.

Iin New Zealand technology is a tool for oppressing the people. Not at all a tool for helping.

Right Dr Bob?

Facebook came out of a Harvard Grad.

And this stite. Well, you are a Harvard Grad too, right?

It was about identifying the people who you could relatively easily lock up in the name of mental illness any time you like. Right? A way to decapitate and remove people from any kind of credible position in life? Right?

Was that the great plan?

What happened to Cubic me? She was enrolled Medical Studetn. Right? Did she ever graduate or did she drop out? What ever happened to GardnerGirl? Did she ever garduate her psychology programme and get a job working as a clinical psychologist? And so on...

It's all a f*ck*ng farce.. So far as I can see...

You really should take a look at the word salad word salad word salad coming out the Supreme Court Judgements of New Zealand. THe word salad coming out of our Judiciary.

New Zealadn isn't even pretending to follow proper process on how our judges are appointed, anymore.

THey just order various people to be re-apointed (people pulled out of retirement). I wouldn't be suprised, at all, if the judges are actually in lock up somewhere. If someone else actually writes the judgment and they simply put their name to it.

We are supposed to believe that tehy keep finding people who aren't supposed to be there in University Medical Courses and in Hospital Operating Theatres. Apparently people are forging working barcodes to give them room access and Identification Numbers that match the roll and that match the room list. I mean to say it is not plausible at all.

Apparently the police get called out becuase dead human remains have been found and they say 'it is just an animal. There is nothing to see here. There will not be an investivation'.

It seems to me that the drug traffickign goes from the only people they will hire to be police and prison guards and psychologists in the prisons etc... To the prisoners. . So the prisoners distribute to their visitors and so the visitors distribute to their communities.

They make sure the prisoners are seeded in various communities where they want to.. Distrupt?? The community.

Like how certain universiyt residential halls they will make sure there are noisy surrounds that they say tehy 'can't do anything about' so that people are sleep deprived. From the party party int eh evening to the 8am chemistry labs... ALl of the planning and work that goes into keeping the people dropping out and deprived.

I wonder for how little the leaders of NZ sold out the heatlh of the people. I bet it's really f*ck*ng embarassing for just how littlel. imean i guess you didn't really have to offer them anything at all. Just for the joy of it. I would suppose.


Re: maths salad

Posted by alexandra_k on September 7, 2022, at 17:00:57

In reply to Re: maths salad, posted by alexandra_k on September 7, 2022, at 16:54:21

all so the people from Harvard can come here and visit their longitudinal study in... I don't know...

how mould grows inside people's lungs in a dose-response-dependent fashion.

they can measure the mould levels when they do the inspections of people living in the government state houses. right? they can measure the humidity and the temperature and get a certain level of mould in their houses and require them to live in that house fo ra certain amount of time.

and see how their lungs go. right? how the asthma works out. how the cancer develops.


i guess you probably want to do it in the childrens classrooms in the schools. then you have to hire truancy officers to ensure they are at their school detention.

the 'bums on seats' education system that pays a bounty to each child's head if you record the child as being enrolled at that fine institution.

they are changing up the NZQA examinations now. they are going to record people as not having high school graduation. i don't suppose it would be a terrible idea if they actually were intersted in teaching people actual skills worth knowing etc etc. but the examintion is word salad.

i mean to say, if you subjected most of the people in new zealand to that examination i bet that people like Jacinda Ardern and teh Attorney General and the Supreme Court Judges and the head surgeons and the like would not pass the examination. Because it is word salad word salad word salad.

They tell people they can't write -- by which they mean to say they will refuse to properly or formally process any of thei rwriting they do.

They won't process their applications (written) for anything. And so on.

That seems to be the idea.

All the people who fail the high school level writing test will have to write to the UN aboaut the crimes of the New Zealand government.
How f*ck*ng tedious.

Cheapest employees for hte UN ever. Right?


What a f*ck*ng farce.


no research supervision at Australian National Uni

Posted by alexandra_k on September 7, 2022, at 17:09:49

In reply to Re: maths salad, posted by alexandra_k on September 7, 2022, at 17:00:57

I applied to do a PhD with the ANU in 2021 to see how they would handle my application to enrol.

They say my application was declined because:

(1) I did not supply a writing sample. False. I supplied a link to my webpage that contained many writing samples including a chapter from OUP and written work that they had previously accepted as writing samples, and judged to be enough for me to be offered PhD enrolment with the ANU.

(2) I did not supply a research proposal. False. I supplied information that I wasn't interested in starting a PhD all over again I was interested in getting credit for work I had already done. I supplied a 100,000+ word thesis on the subject of Kim Sterelny's choosing - evolutionary aspects to cognitive breakdown. He wrote in my file notes that he was willing to supervise me on that topic. I supplied to them the draft that I supplied to him more than 10 years agao. I'm still waiting for him to tell me what I need to do to that draft to get it to externals so I can credit for having completed my ANU PhD. I also supplied a research proposal to Kim Sterelny saying that if I were to begin all over again I would write on how it is in teh Australian Constitution that NZ is a State and Australia says that this isn't true because NZ did not consent. So let's look at the notion of consent and the notion of consent for medical experimentation and treatmetn when it came to people being forced to be immunised otherwise centrelink payments would be withheld etc. Kim Sterelny refused to write a reference for me on my application (they contacted me and sai dthat was so and I'd need to name another referree). I suppose he is all but dead by now. He must be in his 70's? But he is still on payroll in fact. ANd he isnt' willing and / or able to supervise PhD students. He doesn't appear to have done anything really at all when it came to him sulpervising me. He collected up money for having me enrolled, to be sure. Kept writing how I should get extension after externsion after extension to keep working. Did not tell me when I needed to submit it despite him or in spite of him.

(3) They dont' have anyone to supervise. In teh entire Philosophy Programme of Australia's premier Research institution they don't have a single person employed in Philsoophy who is capable of supervising graduate level research.



Who passed my work (my writing samples and my PhD work) off as their own, then?

I can't really think of much other reason for the f*cking tantrums that they are throwing now.

Except, of course, that they are butt hurt that I didn't want to do anything anything anything anything to put on a cocktail dress and party party party party party and make a living refusing to supervise students and refusing to sign off on student and claiming to have enrolled students over and ove rand over and over so as to collect up more and more and more money from the University for keeping the student detained.

Living the dream, right there.


no references for the detainees

Posted by alexandra_k on September 7, 2022, at 17:22:15

In reply to no research supervision at Australian National Uni, posted by alexandra_k on September 7, 2022, at 17:09:49

i do a summer research scholarship at the ANU.

Professor Martin Davies refuses to write me a reference for the work I did for him over the summer.

I suppose that is because the point of the summer research scholarship progarmme at the ANU is to ensure that people stay detained there and do not go from there to anyhwere else.

they then enrol me in their PhD programme. After having refused to write me references for me to have options to go anywhere else. They enrol me in their own programme. I mean to say they judge my work to be good enough for them to want to keep me enrolled so they can claim money from the Autralian government for keeping me deatained as a local studnet (NZers are local studnets when it suits the Australian Goverment and not otherwise) but not good enough for them to write me a reference so I can apply to get out of Australasia.

My file notes say that before they chose to enrol me in the PhD programme they chose Kim Sterelny to be my supervisor and he chose my research topic. He wrote in my file notes that he read my writing samples and judged them to be good enough. He said he thought I seemed professional and 'might be a finisher'. He said he would superviser me on the topic of evolutionary aspects to cognitive breakdown.

He subsequently did not meet with me. Hardly ever asked to see my work. Maybe only once made written comments on my work (very general ones indicating, for example, t hat there was an entire book that I should read for some unspecified reason). He wrote only in my notes that he supported me getting extension after extension after extension for reenrollment after reenrollment after reenrollment. He wrote in my notes (but did not write to me) saying I had nearly a full draft, I had a full draft, I should submit in a certain month. He never told me that I should do that / that I was allowed to do that / that I should just get on and do that.

What is normal or typical or standard? I would imagine that for his other students who completed he would have told them to submit the thesis for examination. He never told me that.

I enrolled wtih Waikato and submitted my theiss for examination when my supervisor Justine Kingsbury (Rutgers Graduate) is having a screaming hissy fit break-down of a tantrum that I should NOT be submitting my thesis WITHOUT HER PERMISSIOn and she was NEVER GOING TO GIVE ME HER PERMISSION

Then the University threw it into their basement and refused to get it to texternals. Apparently I voluntarily chos eto withhdraw my thesis submission. They have no written evidence (when my only communication with them was via written email).

But the judge says none of this matters because I was trying to submit too early.

Because I applied to be enrolled in a 120 point 1 year 1 EFT programme of study and that means I need to work for at least 12 months before being allowed to submit for examination (so I am then forced to pay for 3 months extra time while it is being externally examined and then 6 months extra time because the outcome of 'first examination' is always decided by the university admnistration that no matter what the externals say 6 months re-enrolmetn is required, and then another 3 months external examination for another 12 months on what was only a 12 month enrolment and then up to 10 weeks of extra changes. But they need to say when it 's okaky to submit the 10 weeks kof extra changes. ANd they have discretion to say that they won't letl you submit your 10 weeks of extra changes...


Becuase that's what Univesrity meeeeeeeeeeeeans.


You should see how they go about selecting and training the 'medical doctors'.

There's nothign here.


Nothing. Nada. Zip. Zilch. Zero. Nothing.


the lengths they go to to try and make harvard...

Posted by alexandra_k on September 7, 2022, at 17:44:43

In reply to no references for the detainees, posted by alexandra_k on September 7, 2022, at 17:22:15

look good.


but Harvard went and gave an honorary PhD in law to jacinda ardern because of why?

which completely and totally undermines the value of a Harvard PhD.

And apparently it doesn't matter because it wasnt' a MD or a JD it was a PhD. and nobody will ever employ her to teach or read her research writing on law... well.. i don't know. maybe that's on the poli sci reading list, these days. the momoirs of new zealand politicians...

i am not entirely sure what that was about.

maybe it was to expose the fact that the 2 year masters degrees that Harvard and Yale had offered previously in public health and law were honorary degrees given to the children of elite officicals rather than degrees that would be acknowledged or meant anything in the USA.

but then there is that idiot from university of auckland.. the medical admissions dean who can't calculate a GPA according to published algorithm. actually, i don't think he is an idiot for not having done it properly in the first place. i think he is worse than an idiot in fact for refusing to put right the wrong when the wrong was made apparent.

i mean... the way they calcualted my GPA was in obvious violation of their algorithm. Best 120 points, per year, including summer school papers when the summer school papers are at stage 2 level or above. Part time years (when you do less than 120 points) don't count. They don't count when you get an A+ (bringing your GPA closer to 9) and they also don't count when you get less than an A+ (bringing your GPA closer to 8). They calcualted my GPA on teh basis of 1 part time year (taking more than 12 months to complete 12 months of researh means the student has been forced to part-time credit). They ignored summer school papers at stage 2 and 3 to calculate my WORST rather than BEST GPA for the full time years. The way tehy calculated my GPA is in blatant violation of their published algorithm for each of the 3 years they calculated it over. I showed them how to do it (at least one way) that did not violate their own algorithm. But they are too stupid and or too corrupt to right their wrongs.

Apparently the solution is that my GPA does not count because I am too old. No... Because my GPA is too old. THey reappoint judges who have been retired (because they are over 65 years old). That is not the proper process for appointing judges. They are refusing to appoint new judges. They haul judges out of retirement (Judges with their 2 year masters in Law from Yale) to tell me that Waikato won't give me my MA because I tried to complete 1 year of research in 1 year by submitting my thesis in time for the external examiantion process to be wrapped up within 12 months. So I wouldn't have to pay for re-enrolment and I wouldn't have to accept part time credit for my full time work. They say that I tried to complete 1 year of research 'too early'.

The thing is that they have it in their heads that if the externals say that there is so much as one typographical error, then the Univesrity is justified in saying that the studnet is required to re-enroll for 6 months to make the changes. If the external says a comma needs to be put in. That a reference needs to be added. They are betting on psychology whereby if you examine something you feel obliged to imprint yourself on it in some way. Piss in a corner of it or whatever. Leave something so that you feel you were part of it's creation. Otherwise you won't accept it. So they bet on the externals finding something that needs changing. So they say they always require studnets to undergo a second external examiantion.

So that means that you enrol in a 1 year masters. You post-modernist essay generate teh entire thing and submit it for external examination on day 1. That will be a busy day. You generate it in teh morning and get it bound in the afternoon and you walk it up to the university (dodging the snipers in teh clocktower) so it is submitted on day 1 of your enrolment.

the externals and teh university takes 3 months to tell you that you are required to be enrolled for another 6 months and make the changes the examiners have said you make.

So that brings us to 9 months.

But then it will need to undergo another 3 months of external examination!

That brings us to 12 months.

But if the externals find a typo or something the Univesrity can require you take up to 10 weeks to make those changes.

But you need to be formally enrolled when you submit the thesis in fulfilment of regulations. So you will need to beg and plead and do anything anything anything to pay 10 weeks extra fees for them to accept the thesis in fulfilment of ergulations for hte degree.

and so it's at their discretion.

and then they won't write you references -- becuase htey don't want you hvaing paid work anywhere anywhere anywhere at all.

and that's that.

time to die.

better luck next generation.

There's nothing here.

It isn't like the US is any different. Right?

Brown... People pay.. What? $1 million USD to do an undergrad and a Medical Degree from the Ivy League in the USA.

And then what happens?

Well... They aren't going to give you a supervised internship / they aren't going to sign off on your completion of a supervised internship. Here are your options. (1) You can graduate early (that is to say they will give you an 'honorary degree' since you did not complete the requirements for graduation actually. (2) You can delay or post-pone your graduation indefinately.


Was the entire graduating cohort honorary, then? You pay 1 million USD for an honorary medical degree from the Ivy League.

Nobody will pay you to work that job.

There arent' any medicla doctors in the US, it seems.

I suppose the next thing is terrrorist attcaks blowing up graduation.

I guess it is supposed to be progress or an advancemetn on the previous situation of pretending that the Germans were exterminating people in teh detention camps. each nation is taking responsibility for it's own culling of the people who aren't psychopathic enough to have 'made it'.

Mmm hmmm.

And then they get sick.


Nasty Bruitish and short.

I guess we are supposed to want it to be. Because the only alternative is judges out of retirement and Kim Sterelny collecting up all the research fundign for himself. Though I suspect these people are literally dead. It's just tha they are on payroll and their paycheck is mostly diverted by third parties who are invested in hving them remain on payroll so they can continue to divert the paycheque.

This is the end of the thread.

Show another thread

URL of post in thread:

Psycho-Babble Social | Extras | FAQ

[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,

Script revised: February 4, 2008
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.