![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 160 to 184 of 299. Go back in thread:
Posted by B Day on November 8, 2000, at 12:19:13
In reply to Treatise for the Ladies of Lumptonia, posted by shar on November 8, 2000, at 11:15:44
> I am sure our Esteemed Ambassador would agree with those loving words for the Ladies (especially those without a WH), and should be released from the dog house forthwith and anent.
>
> The Right Honorable Herstorical Curator and High Priestess of Research
>Dearest Right Honorable Herstorical Curator and High Priestess of Research,
The Ambassador and the Havenmaster are very much in accordance regarding our affection for and commitment to the fair lumpettes of our land.
As such, I, the Ambassador...
...will always stand by your side, defend you against any and all enemies, listen attentively when you need an ear, be broad shouldered when you need one to cry on. I will support your decisions even if I think you are wrong. I will love and honor your very existence.
And in harmony with the wishes of The Right Honorable Herstorical Curator and High Priestess of Research, I agree to make myself available to the ladies of Lumptonia (including those who are single) if they need, at times, to call on the Ambassador to help in making their wholes more live.
Long live the Ambassador! Wooof, wooof!
From The Couch Of The Dog House Of The Office Of The Ambassador Of Lumptonia...
Your feisty servant,
Ambassador B
Posted by coral on November 8, 2000, at 12:55:34
In reply to The Day's Early Recap:, posted by B Day on November 8, 2000, at 11:11:53
Dear Mr. Ambassador,
A correction was made that our Sterling CPE is now a Michigan Hillbilly. Ahem..... No, I am not a hillbilly, nor a redneck . . . however, I have been justifiably accused (or complimented) on being a Rebel . . . I am a southerner! As a southerner, it's never a question of whether one has insanity in one's family, but only a question of which side!
You've also mentioned.... gulp, gasp, groan and growl, the HOLIDAYS.
For one of such wisdom, surely you have suggestions about effectively ignoring the loud, boisterous incomprehensible onslaught that's already galloped into society. While creeping into the local pharmacy for prescriptions, I encountered blazing red and green banners, signs proclaiming the spurious advantages of shopping early, and toys suffering from terminal cuteness. Scrooge said it best "Bah! Humbug!"
Help!!!!
Sterling CPE (or should that be SSCPE - southern sterling couoch person extraordinare?)
Posted by Greg on November 8, 2000, at 13:22:43
In reply to Re: Back to the doghouse Mr A, posted by coral on November 8, 2000, at 12:55:34
Having witnessed some of the words Mr. Ambassador has had the mis-fortune of choosing in his recent correspondance (I cringed while shaking my head sadly), perhaps now would be a good time to review THE list of words and phrases that you never, ever say to a woman?
I've had lots of practice in this area, and would be glad to offer my expertise if needed...
HM
Posted by coral on November 8, 2000, at 13:41:12
In reply to Perhaps a word list is in order?, posted by Greg on November 8, 2000, at 13:22:43
Dear Greg,
As Couch Person Extraordinaire who, every now and again, gives a horizontal report of matters in the field, or field of matters, I actively seek your contributions!!!!!
Our poor Ambassador has been barking, scratching, licking and wagging... I wouldn't be a bit surprised to see the poor darling howling at the moon shortly . . . his faux paws have certainly been unintentional...now, his intentional pawing is an entirely different matter that our Esteemed Historical Curator will be covering up...
:)
CPE
Posted by B Day on November 8, 2000, at 14:24:27
In reply to Re: Perhaps a word list is in order?, posted by coral on November 8, 2000, at 13:41:12
To the Good People of Lumptonia,
The Ambassador has decided to postpone his much anticipated flight to Hypomania indefinitely. This is due to lack of responsiveness from the areas he considered his largest incentive for the trip. The Ambassador was truly looking forward to the opportunity of interacting both one on one and in group with our nation's Lumpettes.
It's needless to say making this cancellation was a difficult decision for me. Nevertheless, I have plenty of Hersey's and Cool Whip and take heart for the possibility of a future excursion for I've seen that whether they say "yes", or whether they say "no", every Lumptonian woman seems glad to be asked.
With faux paws from The Cocoon In The Cave Of The Dog House In The Office Of The Ambassador Of Lumptonia,
Mr. A, B
Posted by shar on November 8, 2000, at 14:36:25
In reply to Re: Perhaps a word list is in order?, posted by coral on November 8, 2000, at 13:41:12
To all Lumptonians,
Remember the Lumptonian Ladies, please. Even though our Esteemed Labrador has made MANY faux paws, and has spent and inordinate amount of time on the couch of his dog house, he (how can I say this) has given the secret coded message that some of the populace wants to hear.
I will, of course, make sure that any words attributed to the Ambassador or Havenmaster on the topic of women will be sensitive, caring, and honorable when they appear in the Archives. Any hint of feistiness will not be recorded in the Official Herstorical Archives; that is not to say these two Honorable Gentlemen should eschew feistiness in reality and when called upon.
(Does everyone get the drift, NOW?) Siiggghhhhhhhh...
The Right Honorable Herstorical Curator and High Priestess of Research
> Dear Greg,
>
> As Couch Person Extraordinaire who, every now and again, gives a horizontal report of matters in the field, or field of matters, I actively seek your contributions!!!!!
>
> Our poor Ambassador has been barking, scratching, licking and wagging... I wouldn't be a bit surprised to see the poor darling howling at the moon shortly . . . his faux paws have certainly been unintentional...now, his intentional pawing is an entirely different matter that our Esteemed Historical Curator will be covering up...
>
> :)
>
> CPE
Posted by B Day on November 8, 2000, at 14:40:28
In reply to Perhaps a word list is in order?, posted by Greg on November 8, 2000, at 13:22:43
>...perhaps now would be a good time to review THE list of words and phrases that you never, ever say to a woman?
>
> I've had lots of practice in this area, and would be glad to offer my expertise if needed...
>
> HMDear HavenMaster our Honorary and Smoothest Citizen of Lumptonia,
The Ambassador desperately needs such a list. If your Smoothness can provide the Ambassador with one, he will be forever in your debt.
Otherwise, the Ambassador may soon be seeking political refugee status and asylum in your beautiful land of Haven.
Grovelingly,
Ambassador B
Posted by shar on November 8, 2000, at 14:43:12
In reply to From The Office Of The Ambassador:, posted by B Day on November 8, 2000, at 14:24:27
The Ambassador seems to believe he has a choice in the matter.
TRHCOHAHPOR
> To the Good People of Lumptonia,
>
> The Ambassador has decided to postpone his much anticipated flight to Hypomania indefinitely. This is due to lack of responsiveness from the areas he considered his largest incentive for the trip. The Ambassador was truly looking forward to the opportunity of interacting both one on one and in group with our nation's Lumpettes.
>
> It's needless to say making this cancellation was a difficult decision for me. Nevertheless, I have plenty of Hersey's and Cool Whip and take heart for the possibility of a future excursion for I've seen that whether they say "yes", or whether they say "no", every Lumptonian woman seems glad to be asked.
>
> With faux paws from The Cocoon In The Cave Of The Dog House In The Office Of The Ambassador Of Lumptonia,
>
> Mr. A, B
Posted by B Day on November 8, 2000, at 15:15:25
In reply to From The Office Of The Ambassador: » B Day, posted by shar on November 8, 2000, at 14:43:12
...and so it goes: another typical day in Lumptonia. The birds are chirping, the bees are buzzing and the Ambassador is out of shotgun shells.
The Ambassador wonders if the Lumptonian people find as funny as he does that the most provocative and interesting aspect of the current presidential race has come after the votes have been cast.
This sounds to the Ambassador like something out of a Kurt Vonnegut novel.
With nipped hindquarters,
B, The Labradorian Ambassador Of Lumptonia
Posted by Greg on November 8, 2000, at 18:40:58
In reply to To The HavenMaster HSC: » Greg, posted by B Day on November 8, 2000, at 14:40:28
AB,
I thought rather than to deal with the words as individual entities, I would cover the avoidable subjects,
There are three, Age, Assumption of Meaning and That Time of the Month.
1. Never assume a woman's age:
Avoid phrases like "Is that a grey hair? or "You're not getting older, you're getting better" The one that gets me in the most trouble is "Those aren't wrinkles dear, they're laugh lines"
The viable alternative in all age situations is "Your intelligence is exceeded only by your timeless beauty"
2. Never assume you understand what a woman means:
The following phrases are an accident looking for a place to happen, just fill in the blanks. "But you told me to_________, or "But you said yesterday_________. The worst one being "If you didn't mean it, why did you say it?
The alternative in this situation is always "Dear, your incredible ability to adapt to any given situation has always been a source of inspiration to me"
Never assume that a woman's mood is due to That Time of the Month:
Avoid phrases like "I understand dear, this time of the month is difficult for you" or "What can I do to make you feel better?" The time of the month is not the problem, you are and you don't understand. Despite your best efforts, you will say something that will make her cry. PMS really does mean "Putting up with Men's shit", get used to it.
There is no alternative here. You can't win and you'll only make things worse by trying.
I hope this helps in some way to keep your time in the dog house to a minimum. As I think of more to share with you, I will pass it on.
Alwaye remember that Women are God's greatest and most wonderful creations. Treat them as such and you will survive.
HM
There is no alternative here. This subject is taboo. You can't win, don't try.
Posted by coral on November 8, 2000, at 18:47:53
In reply to Welcome To The Monkey House!, posted by B Day on November 8, 2000, at 15:15:25
Hey, Puppy Paws!!!!!
And they say we're the ones who are nuts???
CPE
Posted by alicefranklin on November 8, 2000, at 19:49:21
In reply to Subjects NEVER to be broached » B Day, posted by Greg on November 8, 2000, at 18:40:58
It amazes me that you seem to have no idea how offensive this is to intelligent, thinking women. (NOT LADIES) It amazes me that you consider yourself to be some charming cherubic
haven provider. I can't believe no one has called you on this sh*t in all these months. At least it proves the point I made months ago: just because one is (insert diagnosis) doesn't mean one is necessarily smarter, more sensitive, more creative, more intelligent, more PERf'ingCEPTIVE than the run-of the-mill slob.
Posted by B Day on November 8, 2000, at 20:03:13
In reply to Re: Subjects NEVER to be broached, posted by alicefranklin on November 8, 2000, at 19:49:21
> It amazes me that you seem to have no idea how offensive this is to intelligent, thinking women. (NOT LADIES) It amazes me that you consider yourself to be some charming cherubic
> haven provider. I can't believe no one has called you on this sh*t in all these months. At least it proves the point I made months ago: just because one is (insert diagnosis) doesn't mean one is necessarily smarter, more sensitive, more creative, more intelligent, more PERf'ingCEPTIVE than the run-of the-mill slob.
>Sorry Greg, I was just waitin' for you to get that one! ;-b
Smilin' from the Dog House,
Mr. A
Posted by Racer on November 8, 2000, at 20:36:35
In reply to Subjects NEVER to be broached » B Day, posted by Greg on November 8, 2000, at 18:40:58
I guess my guy really is as stellar as I think him: He will ask, with great concern, "How do you feel? You must be nearing the end of your sentence, getting ready to punctuate? How's your tummy?"
Of course, it's only natural that he should worship me, of course, even if he does get out of bed and off the sofa at times...
Posted by Racer on November 8, 2000, at 20:39:43
In reply to Re: Subjects NEVER to be broached » Greg, posted by B Day on November 8, 2000, at 20:03:13
> > It amazes me that you seem to have no idea how offensive this is to intelligent, thinking women. (NOT LADIES) It amazes me that you consider yourself to be some charming cherubic
> > haven provider. I can't believe no one has called you on this sh*t in all these months. At least it proves the point I made months ago: just because one is (insert diagnosis) doesn't mean one is necessarily smarter, more sensitive, more creative, more intelligent, more PERf'ingCEPTIVE than the run-of the-mill slob.
> >
>
> Sorry Greg, I was just waitin' for you to get that one! ;-b
>
> Smilin' from the Dog House,
>
> Mr. A
I think it was nice of Greg to step in and draw the flak so that you could run back to the embassy. We should give him the Lumptonian Metal of Valor. Not a medal, you know. A metal. We'll have to discover a new one, first...
Posted by Hannah on November 8, 2000, at 22:04:17
In reply to Re: Subjects NEVER to be broached, posted by alicefranklin on November 8, 2000, at 19:49:21
> how offensive this is to intelligent, thinking women. (NOT LADIES)
I agree. It is very offensive. I hope you reconsider posting this sort of "humor". I don't think I can change your mind but could you just respect those of us who are offended by not posting it? Perhaps you could use private e-mail for this sort of thing?
Posted by shar on November 8, 2000, at 22:25:00
In reply to Subjects NEVER to be broached » B Day, posted by Greg on November 8, 2000, at 18:40:58
Havenmaster,
These words shall have a prominent place in the Official Lumptonian Herstorical Archives. They show wisdom beyond your years, gained, no doubt, at great personal sacrifice to yourself.The Right Honorable Herstorical Curator will not change a word (which shows great restraint on her part), and offers you kudos, and band-aids for your wounds.
RHHC and HPR
> AB,
>
> I thought rather than to deal with the words as individual entities, I would cover the avoidable subjects,
>
> There are three, Age, Assumption of Meaning and That Time of the Month.
>
> 1. Never assume a woman's age:
>
> Avoid phrases like "Is that a grey hair? or "You're not getting older, you're getting better" The one that gets me in the most trouble is "Those aren't wrinkles dear, they're laugh lines"
>
> The viable alternative in all age situations is "Your intelligence is exceeded only by your timeless beauty"
>
> 2. Never assume you understand what a woman means:
>
> The following phrases are an accident looking for a place to happen, just fill in the blanks. "But you told me to_________, or "But you said yesterday_________. The worst one being "If you didn't mean it, why did you say it?
>
> The alternative in this situation is always "Dear, your incredible ability to adapt to any given situation has always been a source of inspiration to me"
>
> Never assume that a woman's mood is due to That Time of the Month:
>
> Avoid phrases like "I understand dear, this time of the month is difficult for you" or "What can I do to make you feel better?" The time of the month is not the problem, you are and you don't understand. Despite your best efforts, you will say something that will make her cry. PMS really does mean "Putting up with Men's shit", get used to it.
>
> There is no alternative here. You can't win and you'll only make things worse by trying.
>
> I hope this helps in some way to keep your time in the dog house to a minimum. As I think of more to share with you, I will pass it on.
>
> Alwaye remember that Women are God's greatest and most wonderful creations. Treat them as such and you will survive.
>
> HM
>
> There is no alternative here. This subject is taboo. You can't win, don't try.
Posted by shar on November 8, 2000, at 22:47:42
In reply to To Greg, posted by Hannah on November 8, 2000, at 22:04:17
Lords and Ladies and Women of Lumptonia,
Upon reflection about the potential offensiveness of the Havenmaster's post:
Given the nature of this imaginary Kingdom, the idea of fantasy and fun, and the topics of Lumping and Blobbing, Couching and Pupating, Sticky Brown Lips, The Official Walk, Nubile Slaves, and the National Food, and the serious humor aimed at anyone and everyone, and, whereas the Herstorical Curator is an intelligent and thinking and overeducated woman/lady (as in m'lady), and has used the concomitant Gentleman in proclamations, and whereas we are deciding not only how to treat the females of Lumptonia, but also how to keep the Esteemed Labrador out of the dog house long enough to evolve a bit, I shall not sway from including the Havenmaster's recommendations in the Archives.
I will however annotate with the posts (word for word) that were vehemently opposed to the Havenmaster's remarks.
The Right Honorable Herstorical Curator and High Priestess of Research
> > how offensive this is to intelligent, thinking women. (NOT LADIES)
>
> I agree. It is very offensive. I hope you reconsider posting this sort of "humor". I don't think I can change your mind but could you just respect those of us who are offended by not posting it? Perhaps you could use private e-mail for this sort of thing?
>
>
Posted by Emmanuela on November 8, 2000, at 22:49:30
In reply to Re: Treatise for the Ladies of Lumptonia » shar, posted by B Day on November 8, 2000, at 12:19:13
'And in harmony with the wishes of The Right Honorable Herstorical Curator and High Priestess of Research, I
agree to make myself available to the ladies of Lumptonia (including those who are single) if they need, at times, to
call on the Ambassador to help in making their wholes more live.'As Prime Ministress, but more importantly, National Choreographer, we're considering whether our esteemed Ambassador needs a Spell Checker (a position needing to be filled), or needs to simply pantomime his thoughts and words. Being politically astute, the Prime Ministress is finding it more and more difficult to believe that our esteemed Ambassador would inadvertently transpose words.
We may be asking for a recount.
Posted by Emmanuela on November 9, 2000, at 0:21:35
In reply to Uh-oh. The Curator Reconsiders., posted by shar on November 8, 2000, at 22:47:42
Beloved Curator (and most likely Curer of Ills) - I salute you (in the official stance of a True Lumptonite, to wit, standing, back bent forward, arms hanging loosely, limply and uselessly, in front of the body)for your wise and wily wisdom. If I may be so bold, I would beg your permission to have our Ambassador appoint you Official Mediator. Would you be able to raise your clever but heavy head off the pillow for nary a second to accept the Appointment?
Posted by Dr. Bob on November 9, 2000, at 3:45:45
In reply to Re: Subjects NEVER to be broached, posted by alicefranklin on November 8, 2000, at 19:49:21
> I can't believe no one has called you on this sh*t in all these months. At least it proves the point I made months ago: just because one is (insert diagnosis) doesn't mean one is necessarily smarter, more sensitive, more creative, more intelligent, more PERf'ingCEPTIVE than the run-of the-mill slob.
Please, it's important to be civil here.
Bob
Posted by coral on November 9, 2000, at 4:00:38
In reply to Re: Uh-oh. The Curator Reconsiders., posted by Emmanuela on November 9, 2000, at 0:21:35
To one and all,
The discussions and discovery of Lumptonia came about as a means to bring a "light-heartednesss" in exploring how some people who suffer from depression co-exist with others (primarily loved ones) who do not suffer from depression. I speak from pure experience since it was my Wonderful Husband (WH) who coined the phrase "Lump person" days.
It is understandable that some people may be uncomfortable even to the degree of finding some posts offensive with such an undertaking. I suppose that is inevitable, albeit unfortunate. I can think of no less than a thousand ways that not only was the original intent (light-heartedness) and the ensuing tangents could be considered politically incorrect by some. However, given the benefits that I've personally received which include literally laughing out loud out-weighed the risks. I presume that my feelings are shared by others who have to continued to post in the true spirit of Lumptonia.
As a Lumptonian, I have not encouraged or sought participants (nor have I seen anyone else do this), but rather people got on this particular train because they, too, appreciated the value in light-heartedness. One of the many nice things about this board is that people are free to not read any particular thread if they so choose.
Those of us, commonly identified as Lumptonians, have playfully pounced on one another, but always using a "light-hearted" approach to explore our differences and different perceptions.
Frankly, this is not a thread for resolving old and obviously real differences of opinion, thoughts and practices as it flies in the face of Lumptonian light-heartedness. This is just one small corner of the world (or play yard as Lumptonians like to think).
I speak only for myself --- in battling the viciousness of depression, I am extremely grateful for others who participate in this thread, in Lumptonia, if you will. It has helped me battle demons with laughter. I will actively fight for the spirit of Lumptonia - I realize the potential oxymoron in that commitment, but stand by it, since I know other Lumptonians will understand.Coral (or as I am known to Lumptonians - Couch Person Extraordinaire - CPE)
Posted by noa on November 9, 2000, at 6:33:45
In reply to Re: Subjects NEVER to be broached » Greg, posted by B Day on November 8, 2000, at 20:03:13
Mr. Ambassador,
Did you set the Ambassador of Havenmaster up for that faux paw? He really got whalloped that time, as you so deftly dodge it.
Posted by noa on November 9, 2000, at 6:51:33
In reply to Re: Where angels fear to tread . . ., posted by coral on November 9, 2000, at 4:00:38
The question of mascot was raised earlier, but still, I believe, remains unresolved.
Several animals were proposed. I recall the sloth, the bear and the penguin. Of course, numerous references to the dog have also been made, but not as a candidate for mascot.
It came to me in my sleep---perhaps another possible mascot:
The SLUG.
Let us consider the options:
Sloth--quite appropriate, particulary its noctunal nature, or more specifically, that it sleeps during the day, and its speed of movement.
Slug--also quite good. I have used this term to refer to my lumpish tendencies ("I was a total slug all weekend"). The slug is slow moving and appears immobile. I am not sure about the slime aspect, but perhaps that has its parallels in lumpism.
Bear--evokes the retreat to the cave and hibernation. And, it can be both lovable and ferocious, which speaks to the possibility of moodiness. Yes, quite good, as well. But what do we make of its summer behavior?
Penguin--stands around a lot, limited limb movement. But, despite looking rather immobile sometimes, have you seen how perky they look in the water? Most importantly--too upright.
I humbly request that this matter be placed before the people.
And, in the interest of avoiding scandalous irregularities in voting, which could lead to a lengthy era of recounting and lawsuiting, I propose the substitution of all butterfly ballots with either rattlesnake ballots or polarbear ballots.
Thank you, kind lumps.
Posted by coral on November 9, 2000, at 6:59:54
In reply to Re:Designation of the Mascot, posted by noa on November 9, 2000, at 6:51:33
Dear Noa,
My WH recommended the turtle or tortoise because it takes its couch with it where ever it goes, the rate of speed (or lack thereof), the capability of immediate withdrawal from the world at-large, and its own firm world all to itself.
Respectfully submitted,
CPE
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Social | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.