Psycho-Babble Administration Thread 1083662

Shown: posts 1 to 21 of 21. This is the beginning of the thread.

 

grow dr-bob.org?

Posted by rjlockhart37 on October 23, 2015, at 21:42:14

the only thing i have told people about this site, where i blog, thinking i was some graundoer person sitting behind a computer screen, the only thign i am is a guy in college, has some goals, right now im 28, and looking for ways to change and help others, and blogs his thoughts......

but comapred to other sites like psychcentral, and more widely known ones, there more of a discussion community, where more like know people here, closer relationships even though it's only through babble mail and posts....and phone numbers but i never talked to anyone off the boards, not babble mail, nothing, but i think looking at this boards, where all posters that have our own posting styles, and it's enjoyable to hear the new thoughts, and online support from people.....yet if you look at the search engines, this site is the one of the read places because our posts are sent to google and in search news feeds, and it's scary in a way, you know for a while i joked and said it's all about me and get attention, these posts are on google, all of them.....just the keywords that are typed into google and it's pulled up.........

babble medical boards, it's wide open for reading all across seach engines.....other places you have to log in and get into a secure group, here you simply type your screen name, password, and then write a post.....then "message added" screen comes up, that means it's published on this site and the web, nothing secure. each post can be it's own website......

but don't want to babble but i've had a alot of thoughts thinking since babble is so open for the whole internet to read, to group it together, and provide like a database on medications and mental support, i mean it is already.....but maybe make it known more by doctors and scholar articlees.....right now it's just a community, maybe bump it up, or something......

advertise?

 

Re: grow dr-bob.org?

Posted by alexandra_k on October 24, 2015, at 20:05:53

In reply to grow dr-bob.org?, posted by rjlockhart37 on October 23, 2015, at 21:42:14

Nobody cares RJ. I think they did when the site was at its peak. When there were a bunch of people posting here. When people were making medication decisions on the basis of a few individuals whose posting names were *particularly trusted* here.

Do you think that pharma sent reps along to try and persuade people this way and that? I'm sure they saw the potential for it. Not just the potential to persuade the docs but the potential to persuade the masses.

Dr Bob played a big part in showing the world something of the potential power of the internet. And now look at it...

I think he's basically retired. He keeps this place open because of people like you and me who simply won't let it go / move on. But it's over RJ.

(I don't know that he envisaged some of the potential... I mean... I don't think he intentionally tried to manipulate us, or anything like that, but there always were pros and cons with the anonymity thing etc).

 

Lou's response-can persuade the masses » alexandra_k

Posted by Lou Pilder on October 25, 2015, at 11:52:09

In reply to Re: grow dr-bob.org?, posted by alexandra_k on October 24, 2015, at 20:05:53

> Nobody cares RJ. I think they did when the site was at its peak. When there were a bunch of people posting here. When people were making medication decisions on the basis of a few individuals whose posting names were *particularly trusted* here.
>
> Do you think that pharma sent reps along to try and persuade people this way and that? I'm sure they saw the potential for it. Not just the potential to persuade the docs but the potential to persuade the masses.
>
> Dr Bob played a big part in showing the world something of the potential power of the internet. And now look at it...
>
> I think he's basically retired. He keeps this place open because of people like you and me who simply won't let it go / move on. But it's over RJ.
>
> (I don't know that he envisaged some of the potential... I mean... I don't think he intentionally tried to manipulate us, or anything like that, but there always were pros and cons with the anonymity thing etc).

a_k,
You wrote,[...persuade people...the masses...power of the internet...I don't think he intentionally tried to manipulate...].
Let us look at the following:
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140902/msgs/10768239.html

 

correct-Lou's response-can persuade the masses

Posted by Lou Pilder on October 25, 2015, at 11:54:20

In reply to Lou's response-can persuade the masses » alexandra_k, posted by Lou Pilder on October 25, 2015, at 11:52:09

> > Nobody cares RJ. I think they did when the site was at its peak. When there were a bunch of people posting here. When people were making medication decisions on the basis of a few individuals whose posting names were *particularly trusted* here.
> >
> > Do you think that pharma sent reps along to try and persuade people this way and that? I'm sure they saw the potential for it. Not just the potential to persuade the docs but the potential to persuade the masses.
> >
> > Dr Bob played a big part in showing the world something of the potential power of the internet. And now look at it...
> >
> > I think he's basically retired. He keeps this place open because of people like you and me who simply won't let it go / move on. But it's over RJ.
> >
> > (I don't know that he envisaged some of the potential... I mean... I don't think he intentionally tried to manipulate us, or anything like that, but there always were pros and cons with the anonymity thing etc).
>
> a_k,
> You wrote,[...persuade people...the masses...power of the internet...I don't think he intentionally tried to manipulate...].
> Let us look at the following:
> Lou
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140902/msgs/10768239.html

correction:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140902/msgs/1076829.html

 

Re: correct-Lou's response-can persuade the masses

Posted by alexandra_k on October 25, 2015, at 17:48:47

In reply to correct-Lou's response-can persuade the masses, posted by Lou Pilder on October 25, 2015, at 11:54:20

Lou, I find it really hard to parse your posts. I honestly have no idea what you are talking about much of the time :)

But if Bob was much swayed by the masses he would have killed more than a few sacrificial cows over the years, and what I've seen, I really don't think that he did.

And here we are.

 

Re: correct-Lou's response-can persuade the masses

Posted by alexandra_k on October 25, 2015, at 17:51:30

In reply to Re: correct-Lou's response-can persuade the masses, posted by alexandra_k on October 25, 2015, at 17:48:47

I'm sorry. I said 'sacrificial cow' and I really have no idea why I said that. I didn't mean anything by it (it has religious meanings).

I just meant that some times the masses have been very vocal in requesting that a particular poster be blocked. Or sometimes the masses have been very vocal in requesting that a particular poster be reinstated. From what I've seen, he's been fairly resistent to doing what the masses wanted over the years.

And he could have introduced a fee... And he could have made quite a lot of money that way, I suppose. But he didn't. Or maybe that's where all the other people went ahahahaha.

 

Lou's reply- persuding the masses » alexandra_k

Posted by Lou Pilder on October 25, 2015, at 19:47:19

In reply to Re: correct-Lou's response-can persuade the masses, posted by alexandra_k on October 25, 2015, at 17:51:30

> I'm sorry. I said 'sacrificial cow' and I really have no idea why I said that. I didn't mean anything by it (it has religious meanings).
>
> I just meant that some times the masses have been very vocal in requesting that a particular poster be blocked. Or sometimes the masses have been very vocal in requesting that a particular poster be reinstated. From what I've seen, he's been fairly resistent to doing what the masses wanted over the years.
>
> And he could have introduced a fee... And he could have made quite a lot of money that way, I suppose. But he didn't. Or maybe that's where all the other people went ahahahaha.

a_k,
The masses can be persuaded here by that Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record can control the content as to what is supportive or not by allowing statements to stand that readers could think then are supportive by Mr. Hsiung's thinking. The masses are not confined to just members here, for this site can be read all over the world. People can be persuaded in countries bent on the destruction of Jews and Israel. People can be persuaded that anti-Semitism is supportive by reading here because antisemiitc propaganda is allowed to be seen as civil and supportive and in Mr. Hsiung's thinking it will be good for his community as a whole to be seen that way.
People can be persuaded to hate Jews by seeing that a psychiatrist allows antisemitic propaganda to be seen as supportive here. People can be persuaded to hate Jews by seeing that the psychiatrist posts the swastika here and refuses to take it down. People can be persuaded to hate Jews as seeing that I as a Jew am being denied equal protection of the rules here by Mr. Hsiung and a whole lot more.
Let us look at [ admin, 428781 ]
Lou

 

Re: Lou's reply- persuding the masses

Posted by alexandra_k on October 25, 2015, at 21:27:29

In reply to Lou's reply- persuding the masses » alexandra_k, posted by Lou Pilder on October 25, 2015, at 19:47:19

If he really hated Jews then he might well have blocked you many years ago.

Unless you are being paid by someone to go on and on and on and on and on and on and on about how people hate Jews until people simply give up in defeat and say:

Yes, Lou. You are right.

Not because they hate Jews, but because they think that might be the only thing that would get you to shut up about it.

Sigh.

Or that maybe your going on and on and on and on and on about how everybody hates Jews might drive people nuts. To the point where they actually do start to develop this very bad impression of Jews as people who go on and on and on and on and on about how everybody hates them which is... Annoying. So then it seems as though a dislike is indeed being fostered.

By who? Lou? By who?

Fortunately, I don't think this is likely to happen. Even if Bob came out with the most horrible hate speech, I simply don't see that any person worth their salt would agree with it just because Bob said. I mean, the masses don't really seem to back him much, do they? He blocks someone and there is an outpouring that he is wrong. He unblocks someone and again, there is an outpouring that he is wrong. Lets suppose that he comes out and says something hateful - do you really think people are going to say 'oh yes Bob, anything you say Bob' all of a sudden like that?

I don't.

But, everyones got their thing, I guess. And I guess this is yours.

 

Lou's reply-never again » alexandra_k

Posted by Lou Pilder on October 26, 2015, at 6:56:17

In reply to Re: Lou's reply- persuding the masses, posted by alexandra_k on October 25, 2015, at 21:27:29

> If he really hated Jews then he might well have blocked you many years ago.
>
> Unless you are being paid by someone to go on and on and on and on and on and on and on about how people hate Jews until people simply give up in defeat and say:
>
> Yes, Lou. You are right.
>
> Not because they hate Jews, but because they think that might be the only thing that would get you to shut up about it.
>
> Sigh.
>
> Or that maybe your going on and on and on and on and on about how everybody hates Jews might drive people nuts. To the point where they actually do start to develop this very bad impression of Jews as people who go on and on and on and on and on about how everybody hates them which is... Annoying. So then it seems as though a dislike is indeed being fostered.
>
> By who? Lou? By who?
>
> Fortunately, I don't think this is likely to happen. Even if Bob came out with the most horrible hate speech, I simply don't see that any person worth their salt would agree with it just because Bob said. I mean, the masses don't really seem to back him much, do they? He blocks someone and there is an outpouring that he is wrong. He unblocks someone and again, there is an outpouring that he is wrong. Lets suppose that he comes out and says something hateful - do you really think people are going to say 'oh yes Bob, anything you say Bob' all of a sudden like that?
>
> I don't.
>
> But, everyones got their thing, I guess. And I guess this is yours.
>
ak,
You wrote about what it would take for me to "shut up about it".
When all the anti-Semitic propaganda here being allowed to be seen as civil by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record is attended to in the same manner as the other violations of his TOS as in posting a vulgar word or such, then I will have nothing more to say here. Be advised that he did start to attend o some of those and then stopped. He then wrote that he does allow anti-Semitic propaganda to be see as being supportive because in his thinking it will be good for his community as a whole for hatred toward the Jews to be seen as being supportive. Then he put up the swastika and refuses to take it down.
To do such while not abiding by his own rules to not post anything about Nazis, insults all Jews all over the world and could lead vulnerable readers to be easily persuaded to hate Jews because they could see that a psychiatrist says that it is not important enough to delete what could inflame hatred toward the Jews and remind Jews of the horrors of Nazism.
You say that a dislike could be fostered toward the Jews because I am trying to get Mr. Hsiung to delete the swastika that he posted and have him sanction the antisemitic propaganda where it is originally posted. Then would not those people want the swastika posted by him to stand?
Mr. Hsiung states that in his thinking what he does, or what he doesn't do, will be good for his community as a whole. I say to you, that the ashes heaped of Jewish children murdered by those flying the swastika can not speak here to Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record that allowed anti-Semitic propaganda to be fostered here as being civil, but I will speak for them.
Never again.
Lou

 

Re: Lou's reply-never again

Posted by alexandra_k on October 26, 2015, at 16:05:30

In reply to Lou's reply-never again » alexandra_k, posted by Lou Pilder on October 26, 2015, at 6:56:17

> You wrote about what it would take for me to "shut up about it".

I meant that some people might wonder. I'm not really bothered by whatever you post. I mean, I wish you were happy rather than being upset - if you would rather be happy than upset... But, whatever. Post about whatever you want.

I just don't see it, I guess.

I remember some stuff not so long ago about the confederate flag in the US... Whether it had become a symbol of hate / racism and whether it should be taken down... People were divided. Divided about what the flag meant to them etc.

I'm not really in much of a position to say anything about racism against Jewish people. We don't really have Jewish people here, so I don't understand the dynamic, or anything. I mean, you wouldn't understand about some of the stereotypes etc that we have... The whole meaning of *p*m* in Australasia thing... What it means today... Anyway... Peace.


 

Lou's reply- » alexandra_k

Posted by Lou Pilder on October 26, 2015, at 20:02:57

In reply to Re: Lou's reply-never again, posted by alexandra_k on October 26, 2015, at 16:05:30

> > You wrote about what it would take for me to "shut up about it".
>
> I meant that some people might wonder. I'm not really bothered by whatever you post. I mean, I wish you were happy rather than being upset - if you would rather be happy than upset... But, whatever. Post about whatever you want.
>
> I just don't see it, I guess.
>
> I remember some stuff not so long ago about the confederate flag in the US... Whether it had become a symbol of hate / racism and whether it should be taken down... People were divided. Divided about what the flag meant to them etc.
>
> I'm not really in much of a position to say anything about racism against Jewish people. We don't really have Jewish people here, so I don't understand the dynamic, or anything. I mean, you wouldn't understand about some of the stereotypes etc that we have... The whole meaning of *p*m* in Australasia thing... What it means today... Anyway... Peace.
>
> a_k,
You wrote,[...I just don't see it...].
To understand what is one just doesn't see, could be understood by understanding Mr. Hsiung's own rules as to not post what could lead one to feel put down or accused. This involves huge psychiatric infliction of emotional distress by {dehumanizing} one or a group of persons, usually on the basis of religion, gender, race etc.
The psychiatry of dehumanizing others in particular here the Jews, is well researched and published. No one has to prove that Mr. Hsiung is not aware of this as a psychiatrist.
Let us look at a very long post that leads into the dehumanization of the Jews being allowed to be posted here with impunity. By allowing Jews to be dehumanized here, the recipe for hate and murder could be cooked into what could feed the minds of readers here to hate Jews. And with the taking of mind-altering drugs along with seeing what is supportive here, what could come out of that is thinking that anti-Semitism is supportive that could result in violence toward Jews.
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20150223/msgs/1077571.html
>

 

Lou's reply-more

Posted by Lou Pilder on October 27, 2015, at 9:09:48

In reply to Lou's reply- » alexandra_k, posted by Lou Pilder on October 26, 2015, at 20:02:57

> > > You wrote about what it would take for me to "shut up about it".
> >
> > I meant that some people might wonder. I'm not really bothered by whatever you post. I mean, I wish you were happy rather than being upset - if you would rather be happy than upset... But, whatever. Post about whatever you want.
> >
> > I just don't see it, I guess.
> >
> > I remember some stuff not so long ago about the confederate flag in the US... Whether it had become a symbol of hate / racism and whether it should be taken down... People were divided. Divided about what the flag meant to them etc.
> >
> > I'm not really in much of a position to say anything about racism against Jewish people. We don't really have Jewish people here, so I don't understand the dynamic, or anything. I mean, you wouldn't understand about some of the stereotypes etc that we have... The whole meaning of *p*m* in Australasia thing... What it means today... Anyway... Peace.
> >
> > a_k,
> You wrote,[...I just don't see it...].
> To understand what is one just doesn't see, could be understood by understanding Mr. Hsiung's own rules as to not post what could lead one to feel put down or accused. This involves huge psychiatric infliction of emotional distress by {dehumanizing} one or a group of persons, usually on the basis of religion, gender, race etc.
> The psychiatry of dehumanizing others in particular here the Jews, is well researched and published. No one has to prove that Mr. Hsiung is not aware of this as a psychiatrist.
> Let us look at a very long post that leads into the dehumanization of the Jews being allowed to be posted here with impunity. By allowing Jews to be dehumanized here, the recipe for hate and murder could be cooked into what could feed the minds of readers here to hate Jews. And with the taking of mind-altering drugs along with seeing what is supportive here, what could come out of that is thinking that anti-Semitism is supportive that could result in violence toward Jews.
> Lou
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20150223/msgs/1077571.html
> >
> A_K,
This could also be informative
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/2010903/msgs/1050971.html
>

 

correction- Lou's reply-more

Posted by Lou Pilder on October 27, 2015, at 9:15:12

In reply to Lou's reply-more, posted by Lou Pilder on October 27, 2015, at 9:09:48

> > > > You wrote about what it would take for me to "shut up about it".
> > >
> > > I meant that some people might wonder. I'm not really bothered by whatever you post. I mean, I wish you were happy rather than being upset - if you would rather be happy than upset... But, whatever. Post about whatever you want.
> > >
> > > I just don't see it, I guess.
> > >
> > > I remember some stuff not so long ago about the confederate flag in the US... Whether it had become a symbol of hate / racism and whether it should be taken down... People were divided. Divided about what the flag meant to them etc.
> > >
> > > I'm not really in much of a position to say anything about racism against Jewish people. We don't really have Jewish people here, so I don't understand the dynamic, or anything. I mean, you wouldn't understand about some of the stereotypes etc that we have... The whole meaning of *p*m* in Australasia thing... What it means today... Anyway... Peace.
> > >
> > > a_k,
> > You wrote,[...I just don't see it...].
> > To understand what is one just doesn't see, could be understood by understanding Mr. Hsiung's own rules as to not post what could lead one to feel put down or accused. This involves huge psychiatric infliction of emotional distress by {dehumanizing} one or a group of persons, usually on the basis of religion, gender, race etc.
> > The psychiatry of dehumanizing others in particular here the Jews, is well researched and published. No one has to prove that Mr. Hsiung is not aware of this as a psychiatrist.
> > Let us look at a very long post that leads into the dehumanization of the Jews being allowed to be posted here with impunity. By allowing Jews to be dehumanized here, the recipe for hate and murder could be cooked into what could feed the minds of readers here to hate Jews. And with the taking of mind-altering drugs along with seeing what is supportive here, what could come out of that is thinking that anti-Semitism is supportive that could result in violence toward Jews.
> > Lou
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20150223/msgs/1077571.html
> > >
> > A_K,
> This could also be informative
> Lou
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/2010903/msgs/1050971.html
> > correction:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20130903/msgs/1050971.html
>
>

 

Re: correction- Lou's reply-more

Posted by alexandra_k on October 29, 2015, at 4:17:31

In reply to correction- Lou's reply-more, posted by Lou Pilder on October 27, 2015, at 9:15:12

lets suppose (for the sake of argument) that you are right and that they are anti-semitic.

I wouldn't want to read them.

lets suppose (for the sake of argument) that you are right that people who read them will become anti-semitic...

Then why do you want me to read them?

It's okay, you don't have to answer.
Carry on...

 

Lou's reply-truzme » alexandra_k

Posted by Lou Pilder on October 29, 2015, at 8:28:05

In reply to Re: correction- Lou's reply-more, posted by alexandra_k on October 29, 2015, at 4:17:31

> lets suppose (for the sake of argument) that you are right and that they are anti-semitic.
>
> I wouldn't want to read them.
>
> lets suppose (for the sake of argument) that you are right that people who read them will become anti-semitic...
>
> Then why do you want me to read them?
>
> It's okay, you don't have to answer.
> Carry on...

A_k,
If the anti-Semitic propaganda being allowed here to be seen as supportive was sanctioned like other statements that put down/accuse or insult another's faith, then vulnerable readers could not think that Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record are validating the hatred toward the Jews that those posts could convey.
But it is a whole lot more than that. For Mr. Hsung has in his stated TOS that he wants readers to try to trust him in what he is doing here because he has some vision that in the future what he does will be good for his community asd a whole even if Jews are allowed to be defamed by the third-party posters being allowed to post anti-Semitic propaganda with impunity here. This "trusting" of him at what he is doing marks the difference between just allowing hatred toward the Jews to be posted by third parties, and anti-Semitic hate being {created and developed} here by those that control the content here which is Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record and those posters allowed to post with impunity anti-Semitic hate. This then becomes a design that could corrupt the minds of young people and adults to think that anti-Semitism is supportive and {will be} "good" somehow because Mr. Hsiung asks for readers to trust him.
And when readers see that I am denied equal protection of Mr. Hsung's rules that could stop him and his deputies of record from allowing the advancement of anti-Semitic hate here, those readers could think that Jews are inferior people according to Mr. Hsiung and his deputies that allow the anti-Semitic hate to stand as being supportive. And worse, the readers that see that Mr. Hsiung has stated that he ignores my requests so that by his example others could also ignore me, can create and develop anti-Semitic hate by his example and the other deputies that go along with him to ignore my requests.
When let's say, a Jewish child reading here for support sees that Jews are treated differently and discriminated upon by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record by being denied equal protection of his rules, those vulnerable readers could commit suicide as being demeaned as being unworthy of the protection of the rules here which could draw them into a vortex of inferior feelings that psychiatrists know leads to further depression and could land those readers into the thinking of killing themselves. And that, according to Mr. Hsiung from his own mouth, where he says that if he leaves un supportive anti-Semitic statements to be seen as civil, he is doing that so that it will be good for his community as a whole.
And where mind-altering drugs are allowed to be promoted without being in compliance with the FDA rules for such as here, the Jewish person under control of a psychiatrist drugging them, could be swayed to kill themselves as the drugs can induce suicidal thoughts and here that could jump start those being discriminated against to complete the suicide. And this is being supportive according to Mr. Hsiung and his band of deputies that allowed the anti-Semitic propaganda to stand as being supportive as seen.
And even worse, those non-Jews that live in communities that consider Jews to be replaced by Christiandom people in God's eyes, could easily adopt what they see here as that it will be good to discriminate against Jews because a psychiatrist is discriminating against me as a Jew here by denying me equal protection of his rules by leaving my notifications outstanding. This could lead to the dehumanizing of Jews as they see a psychiatrist doing so which is a very powerful influence for those that already are bent to kill Jews to stab Jews to death. And this here can be read all over the world reaching vulnerable people to be influenced to hate Jews as I am being used as a scapegoat here for people's real or imagined ills, and the scapegoating is allowed to be seen as being supportive by Mr. Hsiung and his band of deputies of record. The scapegoating can attract people that a deeper hatred toward the Jews can be implanted into them from here. Those people that swallow that propaganda against me here being allowed to foment by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record, can have a deeper hatred toward Jews because the scapegoating makes those readers that see it being supportive to think that they are being harmed by me as a Jew here. They then can justify {falsely} their infliction of emotional distress upon me here with their defamation against me being allowed by Mr. Hsiung with impunity here. They could then act out this hate in the community where they reside as thinking that it {will be} "good" sometime in the future as Mr. Hsiung states that he is doing what {will be} good for his community as a whole and to try to trust him at that.
This is nothing new, but an old tactic from European Fascism developed by Rousseau going on to Mussolini and the psychiatrists that started the killing machines that lead to millions of Jewish children being murdered and 100 million others. How could anyone here want to have this to continue because Mr. Hsiung wants you to trust him at what he is doing here?
Lou

 

Re: Lou's reply-truzme

Posted by rjlockhart37 on October 29, 2015, at 18:07:42

In reply to Lou's reply-truzme » alexandra_k, posted by Lou Pilder on October 29, 2015, at 8:28:05

Lou, i just wanted to ask this, been for a long time now, but what do you do for your time because you have so much thoughts about the jews, and dr-bob preventing you from posting it, what ... do you browse on news and stuff about these topics? im just trying to understand from a view point, because your posts, not trying to be nosey.....do you read alot of news sites, and google about these topics?

i mean you have a vary clearly set-mind, and you have a view point and are based well in it, but what happened? did something in the past happen?

 

Re: Lou's reply-truzme » rjlockhart37

Posted by alexandra_k on October 29, 2015, at 18:11:06

In reply to Re: Lou's reply-truzme, posted by rjlockhart37 on October 29, 2015, at 18:07:42

> did something in the past happen?


you mean, aside from the holocaust?

 

Re: Lou's reply-truzme

Posted by rjlockhart37 on October 29, 2015, at 22:08:16

In reply to Re: Lou's reply-truzme » rjlockhart37, posted by alexandra_k on October 29, 2015, at 18:11:06

lol yes i know but what im just trying to see what the motive is for Lou that he has posted about this repeatdly for years, something must of happened in his personal life, or mind to be so focused on this, he clearly has a well set mind, with good beliefs and standards but im just trying to see what Lou, what he does during his free time to have such strong beliefs in this subject.....

something must of happened, or just coicidence that he believes to keep on posting it.......but i havent read in depth on his posts that are on the discussion with other posters.....

im just curious......Lou what happened? what makes you so urgent in this mind set, is dr-bob truely not letting you post about these topics?

 

Re: Lou's reply-truzme

Posted by rjlockhart37 on October 29, 2015, at 22:16:11

In reply to Lou's reply-truzme » alexandra_k, posted by Lou Pilder on October 29, 2015, at 8:28:05

"Mr. Hsiung states that he is doing what {will be} good for his community as a whole and to try to trust him at that"

-drbob has been absent from babble for a long period......we basically are running it with our discussions

 

Re: Lou's reply-truzme

Posted by rjlockhart37 on October 29, 2015, at 22:20:53

In reply to Re: Lou's reply-truzme, posted by rjlockhart37 on October 29, 2015, at 22:16:11

i'm guessing im not knowing about something, because something is obvious but i dont because havnet kept up with the discussions.....

 

Lou's reply-antisemitism promoted on social media » alexandra_k

Posted by Lou Pilder on October 30, 2015, at 8:49:57

In reply to Re: Lou's reply-truzme » rjlockhart37, posted by alexandra_k on October 29, 2015, at 18:11:06

> > did something in the past happen?
>
>
> you mean, aside from the holocaust?
>
A_K,
If you look at [ admin, 428781 ], this was the start of something in the past here that I tried to stop and Mr. Hsiung provided a venue to post hatred toward the Jews with impunity from his enforcement policy here which allowed anti-Semitic hate to be posted here contradicting his own rules not to post what could pot down/accuse those of other faiths and altering his own drafted rule to not post anti-Semitism in a link, period. After being allowed to post anti-Semitic hate with impunity by Mr. Hsiung providing the opening for this to happen, other posters were fueled by the fire of hate to post more anti Jewish statements and Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record allowed them to stand to this day as being seen as being supportive and worse, that by them being allowed to be seen as supportive by him, it will in his thinking be good for this community as a whole and worse, for readers to try to trust him at that. This is the foundation of antisemitism being allowed to be promoted on social media that could recruit Jew-haters all over the world into a mind-set of that killing Jews is justified as they could see a psychiatrist attempting to justify leaving anti-Semitic hate to be seen as that it will be good for his community as a whole in his thinking to be seen as being supportive by him as he states that being supportive takes precedence.
Let us look at this video
Lou
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZ8HhRGQqdY


This is the end of the thread.


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.