![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 8 of 8. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by 10derheart on April 29, 2015, at 22:08:56
Re: 4/29/2015 post
"...no intervention by Mr.[Dr.]Hsiung or any deputy of record...
Posted by ClearSkies on April 30, 2015, at 12:48:06
In reply to There are no deputies to intervene, posted by 10derheart on April 29, 2015, at 22:08:56
We're self operating, hmm? That was quite a thud.
Posted by 10derheart on May 1, 2015, at 12:21:37
In reply to Re: There are no deputies to intervene, posted by ClearSkies on April 30, 2015, at 12:48:06
Just correcting Mr. Pilder's erroneous use of the present tense - over and over and over and over and over again - when calling for the actions he says are not happening but should be on posts he believes are....whatever he believes they are.
I can't stop caring when I (we) who haven't been deputies here literally for years, are wrongly accused. It won't do a whit of good, I know, when opinions are presented as fact, and actual facts ignored, but it makes me feel a tiny bit less powerless.
Posted by ClearSkies on May 1, 2015, at 15:26:38
In reply to Re: There are no deputies to intervene » ClearSkies, posted by 10derheart on May 1, 2015, at 12:21:37
Posted by Lou Pilder on May 1, 2015, at 17:35:25
In reply to Re: There are no deputies to intervene » ClearSkies, posted by 10derheart on May 1, 2015, at 12:21:37
> Just correcting Mr. Pilder's erroneous use of the present tense - over and over and over and over and over again - when calling for the actions he says are not happening but should be on posts he believes are....whatever he believes they are.
>
> I can't stop caring when I (we) who haven't been deputies here literally for years, are wrongly accused. It won't do a whit of good, I know, when opinions are presented as fact, and actual facts ignored, but it makes me feel a tiny bit less powerless.Friends,
What is a deputy of record? Many of you already know that there have been many deputies and not all of the deputies were deputies at the same time. As of now, there is a deputy of record as can be determined in the TOS/FAQ. Previously, the FAQ had different deputies and there were additions/deletions to the record in the FAQ as to who they could be at different times.
The issue at hand here is who were the deputies that received my notifications and did not act according to the TOS here on those. They were the deputies that were on record in the TOS/FAQ at the time of the notification from me. That is why I use the phrase, {deputy of record}, so I can identify only those deputies that were recorded in the FAQ at the time of the post in question that did not act on the notification from me.
You see, the outstanding notifications from me could be acted on by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record. Because Mr. Hsiung states that he leaves my notifications outstanding, those deputies {of record} would also have to not act on those notifications or then if they did, the notification would not be outstanding. So it is not only Mr. Hsiung that is leaving my notifications outstanding, it is also the deputies of record that are leaving them outstanding.
This denies me equal protection of the TOS here which could be thought by a subset of readers to constitute discrimination against me that could IMHO create a climate of hate that could be acted out in real-world situations, as that subset of readers could think that the anti-Semitic propaganda allowed to be seen here as supportive, could be acted out in anti-Semitic violence because that subset of readers could think that anti-Semitism is supportive and will be good for their community as a whole because Mr. Hsiung does what in his thinking will be good for his community as a whole and then since the deputies did not also act on the notifications, those readers could think that those deputies or record also think the same. What is worse, is that for Mr. Hsiung to leave a notification from me outstanding, and years of them, all the deputies of record would also have to turn their back to me, so in order for that to happen, a subset of readers could think that there could be a complicity between Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record, for how else could he keep the notification from being acted on by the deputies of record? You see, for Mr. Hsiung to say that he can leave any of my notifications outstanding, and there are years of them, even if another member notified the same post, he could ignore that notification so that my notification could not be acted on by him, and the deputies of record could have a real problem then because not only are they discriminating against me, but they also have to discriminate against another to pull it off with Mr. Hsiung to keep the notification from being acted on.
This is nothing new, but an old way that deputies have to do the wishes of the one deputizing them, or they could resign. But by resigning, that does not annul the fact that when they were deputies of record, I think that they were responsible for implementing the policies of Mr. Hsiung and in the posts involved in my notifications, they did not when they could have.
Lou
Posted by Phillipa on May 1, 2015, at 20:18:26
In reply to Lou's respone-deputies or record » 10derheart, posted by Lou Pilder on May 1, 2015, at 17:35:25
Lou a deputy was a volunteer position and there are none volunteering now. Would you like to be one? Phillipa
Posted by 10derheart on May 1, 2015, at 22:14:10
In reply to Lou's respone-deputies or record » 10derheart, posted by Lou Pilder on May 1, 2015, at 17:35:25
Posted by Lou Pilder on May 2, 2015, at 9:17:33
In reply to ROTFLMAO so many errors and assumptions (nm) » Lou Pilder, posted by 10derheart on May 1, 2015, at 22:14:10
10 and friends,
Be advised that there are people that read this site from all over the world. And what stands here can be considered to be civil and supportive and will be good for this community as a whole in Mr. Hsiung's thinking. Where these posts that accuse and put down Jews and deride Judaism itself are allowed to be seen as supportive here, that could mean that those readers could think that not only is the anti-Semitic propaganda that is seen as supportive in Mr. Hsiung's thinking, but it could also be that all of the deputies of record consider the anti-Semitic propaganda civil to them. There is a rational basis for them to think that because Mr. Hsiung states that any reply (or inaction which is a reply or indifference) {...comes from all of us...}.
This is nothing new here by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record to leave my notifications un acted upon by them. The historical record shows how tyrannical leaders bent on the destruction of the Jews promised their subjects that in the future what they are doing in persecuting the Jews would be good for their country (and logically good for some of them). The game-plan was to lead the non-Jews in the country to believe that Jews are inferior, guilty of deicide, replaced by christiandom people, and dehumanize them and discriminate against them, denying them equal protection of the laws, and making them out to be the enemies of them, using them for scapegoats for real or imagined ills of the country, so that those persecuting the Jews could falsely believe that they were not doing the harm to another human being, that is why in war-crimes trials to those that committed acts against the Jews were charged with crimes against humanity. The anti-Semitic propaganda allowed to be seen here as supportive, dehumanizes Jews and me as a Jew here so that other posters can post hatred and defamation and dehumanizing statements against me here with impunity, for after all, readers could think that Mr. Hsiung promises that it will be good for the community as a whole in his thinking to allow it. So posters posting anti-Semitic propaganda and defamation toward me could think that they are doing "good", for Mr. Hsiung says to [..."trust me"...].
The game-plan goes on and on because they can break their own rules which could lead a subset of readers to think by them being allowed to discriminate, insults their intelligence to even be a member here, for the deputies and Mr. Hsiung are their own umpires, their own jury, their own prosecutors, They can change their own rules in the middle of the game. They can ignore their own rules, they can change their own rules, they can evade and misrepresent as to what support means, even claiming that their TOS is based on fairness and The Golden Rule, and all of this could result IMHHHO in the deaths of innocent children and adults that come here for support thinking that there is a level playing field here and find that the rules change to tilt the field in a distortion that could cause one to vomit.
If there are any errors in what I posted that the former deputy called "10derheart" says that there is, I would like to see them so that I could post my response to her or anyone else that wants to go along with her.
Here is a previous post that I would like readers to see.
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140304/msgs/1067785.html
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.