Psycho-Babble Social | for general support | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Mackenzie Friend

Posted by alexandra_k on September 16, 2022, at 19:34:05

In reply to Mackenzie Friend, posted by alexandra_k on September 16, 2022, at 19:02:36

I say this because...

It is obviously and clearly a matter of public interest whether the Universities of New Zealand are functioning as Universities or whether they are functioning as Slave or Detention Camps or Endentured Servant Camps where people are getting into Unreasonable Levels of Debt when the Government has no intention of providing employment on the back of the qualifications such that the Level of Debt can be paid off reasonably.

I do understand that Slavery could mean a few different things.. The US focuses on Slavery with respect to buying and selling and trading people as property. So to document that one is descended from Slaves in the US the sort of evidence you supply is that your anscestors were listed as property or were brought and sold for sums of money.

But there is a different part to slavery in other places...

Where they don't pay people for the work they do.

I guess the endentured servants.. Came out from England with the promise that if they worked for x number of years they would be paid (their labor would be compensated or remunerated) with knowledge to look after the land and make it productive also with a chunk of land for them to work and make a living off or from.

HOwever many of them died of maleria when it was time to give them their land so they could make their own living. Before it was time to do that.

So apparently that is endentured servitude. That is also unlawful. Obviously morally problematic. When the intention is to blow up graduation. Or to simply refuse to graduate. Make some final 'capstone project' hoop and fail everyone for that.

Give someone 'A+ best in class' and then fail them out the qualification. Take someone 'best I've seen in 20+ years of teachign' and fail them out of the qualification.

And apparently there isn't enough to go around. That is the problem. There isn't enough land for all of the people to be given any. They offered work-internships to people expecting that... 10%? 20%? 90%? 100% would die when it was time to pay them.

They say 'for your qualification completion to take effect on your salary various things need to happen. You need to supply us with documentation of your graduation'.

And you supply the evidence.

And they say 'we did not get the evidnece. If you don't supply it by a date then you won't get paid'.

And they have system software payroll problems and they won't accept the evidence.

Not until they say your qualification as 'expired'.

So you work for a teacher as how many years? And by 'work' I mean you do the work without them paying you... Do the work first... And then we will pay you...

But the only people who seem to be on payroll are the ones who don't do the work.

Because the work must not be done. Not by anyone.

There aren't any doctors or teachers or lawyers etc.

Not so far as I can see...

Since when did QC's mean people who the Government chooses to get to appear in court to defend the government for actions where they refuse to do any of the thigns they are supposed to do.

QC's are lawyers the governmetn hires to deny that they absued people in state care (they are presently overturning past criminal convictions because a person being convicted of the crime of rape (for example) when they were in state care against a victim who is also in state care in the same institution constitutes evidence of abuse in state care. So they are overturning the convictions now.

What are they doing with the people whose convictions are overturned?

Why, they are rehabilitating them by putting them as 'teacher aides' and 'nurses aids' and so on amongst their preferred demographic for offending.

That seems to be the idea/l of it.

They will likely fast-track them for the qualifications, too.

I wonder how much they do actually pay various people...

For example, Chris Hipkins is the CE (Chief Executive) of the NZVCC (New Zealand Vice Chancellor's Committee). THe Education and Training Act (varoius versions with various amendments none of them relevantly different current version 2020 I think)... States very specifically what the role of the CE of the NZVCC is in handling complaints of wrongdoing against NZ Universities. THe NZVCC publishes policy documents on how to lodge a complaint and how the complaint will be handled. Chris Whelan is refusing to acknowledge receipt of complaints and refusing to do what the policy he wrote says he will do (refusing to collect evidence and have a meeting of the NZVCC and / or refusing to get the collected evidence and allegations to police to help them prosecute).

The Courts of NZ say that...

Chris Whelan would be breaking the law if he were to progress complaints in accordance with the policy he wrote. He would be over-stepping his statutory authority if he were to actually fulfil his statutory function.

Nonsense. Garbage output. Chris Whelan would be acting Ultra Vire (going above his statutory authority) if he did what the statute f*ck*ng well says. I put it to you that there is another name for htat; Doing your f*ck*ng job. You know. The job for which you are paid.

The Courts of NZ say that...

The Universities have unlimited discretion to process (or throw away) applications to enrol as they see fit. They have discretiont o process (or throw away) things like theses submitted for examination or things like sign off on internships. The Universities can simply refuse to acknowlede them. The Universities can give degrees to people who haven't met requirements (honorary degrees) and can withhold degrees from people who have met requirements. THey can do whatever they want in this respect.

The Courts of NZ say that how they treated me is no differnet from how they treat variious other studnets..

But they also say that it is personal. It is not a matter of public interest because it's all very personal and very specific against me.

Garbage garbage garbage garbage garbage output from the 'courts'.


So.... How much do they actually pay Chris Whelan, again?

Or does he pay them. I guess.

Maybe he pays them he pays them he pays them he pays he pays he pays... And, in exhange they say 'Chris Whelan is the CE of the NZVCC on a Salary of several hundred thousands of dollars per year with the very important statutory function of upholding the quality and integrity of NZ University qualifications and ensuring that we honor our duties to investigate complaints of wrongdoing (e.g., criminal activity within the University admnistration and management) in accordance with norms set by international community.

You know... Not to intentionally harbor pedophiles in the schools. Etc.




Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.


Start a new thread

Google www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Social | Framed

poster:alexandra_k thread:1120658