Psycho-Babble Social | for general support | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: (1) One or Six???

Posted by Mark H. on February 28, 2005, at 20:23:12

In reply to Re: (1) One or Six??? » alexandra_k, posted by alexandra_k on February 28, 2005, at 18:00:38

There's also the legal aspect: to do nothing makes the resulting deaths the fault of the six people standing on the tracks; to take any action that you know for a fact will cause a person's death (in this case by diverting the train to avoid hitting the six) creates liability for your actions, potentially both criminal and civil.

Of course there are lots of qualifiers that would come into play in a real-life situation, but your scenario specifically eliminates those. As a result, it comes down to "do nothing and *allow* six people to die" versus "do something and directly *kill* one person."

In our litigious society, there may not be much room for utilitarianism in this example.

Mark H.


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Social | Framed

poster:Mark H. thread:464517
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20050224/msgs/464627.html