Psycho-Babble Social | for general support | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Not enough dimensions

Posted by Dinah on January 9, 2005, at 4:42:34

In reply to Kinsey scale, posted by Miss Honeychurch on January 4, 2005, at 15:24:45

A two dimensional scale just doesn't cover the range of sexuality, IMHO. I figure I'm somewhere around a 2. But my preference for imaginary, celluloid, or in-text men is greater than my preference for real men over real women. Also I'm predominately solosexual. Which isn't covered at all, unless it means that I should push myself higher on the scale. And then, solosexuality adds a whole new range of possibilities. Sensuality is everywhere. I can't even begin to imagine the number of things I'm just as attracted to as men or women.

Or maybe I really am schizotypal.

 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Social | Framed

poster:Dinah thread:436905
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20050106/msgs/439668.html