Psycho-Babble Psychology | about psychological treatments | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Is there another part to that? » Dinah

Posted by alexandra_k on March 28, 2005, at 0:58:26

In reply to Re: Is there another part to that? » alexandra_k, posted by Dinah on March 28, 2005, at 0:50:07

> Ah, when you move from logic to metaphysics, I think my brain reaches its limits. :)

Thats ok. When you move from logic to math, my brain reaches mine :-)

> I think for my own purposes I'll stick with the dummies guide to the self.

Sigh.
I am not very clear. Dennett writes much better than me.

> But that doesn't account for the disavowal of what is actually part of me but that I don't wish to claim. That's where I always get stuck.

You and many philosophers before you.

> In my very humble opinion, because this is a difficult thing to grasp, role playing ought to be thrown out as a genuine part of the definition of a self. But disavowal is an almost insurmountable hurdle to overcome. Because how can you ever really know for sure? No matter what? So alters *could* be mutually disavowed fragments of the self. How could you ever prove they weren't?

How could you ever prove they were??

Don't give up.
Please.

I think the next bit might be a bit easier...


 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Psychology | Framed

poster:alexandra_k thread:476326
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/psycho/20050315/msgs/476561.html