Posted by tealady on March 10, 2006, at 0:46:10
In reply to Re: a way to state desperately important things, posted by deirdrehbrt on February 22, 2006, at 13:51:12
> It seems that unless there is a civil way to say things, and a way to express what some fundamentalist leaders say without repeating their words, or, for that matter directly pointing to them, that we can't have this discussion here.
> The only way to do so with the current rules of civility would be something like this:
> Some religious leaders say things that I believe to be untrue and hurtful about the GLBT community. Naming those who do so might upset some who trust them, so I can't do that. Because the words they use are harsh and upsetting, I can't repeat them or provide a link to the things they do say.
well said. Meant to reply b4.