Posted by Lou Pilder on August 22, 2010, at 14:09:44
In reply to Re: please be civil » Lou Pilder, posted by Dr. Bob on July 22, 2010, at 17:51:45
In regards to what you posted to me that is linked here as the previous post, I am unsure as to what you re wanting to mean by what you wrote concering what I posted here.
If you could anaswer the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond to what you post to me here.
A. Have I posted a response to you here already concerning what you have posted to me, for I remember asking if what you wanted to mean by what you posted to me was that the statement in question is or is not factual? If you consider the statement to be in accordance with the definition of such, then what could be your rationale for writing to me waht you wrote? For if the statement in question does meet the generally accepted criteria, and the criteria that you have posted here that you use to make that determination, for determining if the statement is in fact what it is, then is it not what it is? You see, the statement by me was about what you are allowing to be posted here and that your TOS states that the forum is for support and I have been asking you to post in the thread in question as to if you consider the statement in question that I wrote as being in the catagory in question to be supportive or not because you state that support takes precedence and one match could cause a forest fire.
B. If so, where has it been reposted, if it was?
C. If I have already posted a response to you, an it has not been redirected, then could you post a rationale here as to why it is not here in this thread?
D. If I am incorrect about a previous post to you here, here are some concerns of mine in the posts that I am requesting that you look at that are in an assembly of posts concerning this ongoing situation that others could email if they like for the other posts in that assembly of posts.