Psycho-Babble Faith | about religious faith | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: the Process Theologian Dinah

Posted by wendy b. on June 4, 2003, at 23:11:09

In reply to Re: Hey! I'm a process theologian!- Wendy zenhussy, posted by Dinah on May 29, 2003, at 20:03:52

> Chuckle. Well, I had never heard the term before Sunday. And I'm not sure it was applied in a positive way. :) But naturally I raced home to see what on earth it meant, and found that I do in fact subscribe to some variant of process theology.

Don't you just love a research project? (smiles)

> I have been largely influenced in my ideas of God by Rabbi Harold Kushner, and I thought that his thought was typical Jewish thought since it fits in with what I've read by other Jewish authors as well. But apparently he is viewed as a process theologian as well.

Very interesting -- that you were drawn to someone's teachings who was identified by others as a process theologian. Don't you think?

> A process theologian believes God created the world, but doesn't intervene in a physical way on a day to day basis. He allows man to exercise his free will, which means that horrible things sometimes happen. And since he doesn't intervene in the natural laws of nature, there is illness and death. And he grieves with us, supports us, strengthens us, hopes that we choose the right path, is happy when we do, and sad when we don't.

I like this was of dealing with the idea of free will (though I'm still not sure that it exists - for me).

> This type of theology partially answers the age old question of why bad things happen to good people, but some people believe that the God described by process theologians is a weak and ineffectual one. They don't like the idea that God is not omniscient and omnipotent (even if it was his own plan to limit the use of his powers), and urges rather than compels. So there is a lot of criticism of process theology on that point.

I always had a hard time with religions that viewed God as omnipotent and powerful, because to me this meant: scary. And it's hard to snuggle up to the idea of god, when he's busy throwing lightening-bolts and raging. It's probably easier for me to think of God as a gentler force in the universe.

> Since I'm new to the whole idea myself, I may not have explained it well. Here is an excerpt from:
> A Theology of Joy: God in the Process
> a service presented by Rev. Elizabeth L. Greene and Bernard Zaleha
> Boise Unitarian Universalist Fellowship
> March 14, 1999
> "God's role, now that God has gotten things rolling, is radically different from the omniscience, omnipotence and judgment with which many of us are familiar-in process theology, God is always interacting with creation. God's nature is relatedness with creation; God's nature is creative and responsive love. The Creator endowed each thing in the universe with the Creator's "initial aim," which is, in process theologian John Cobb's words "to actualize the best possibilities open to it, given its concrete situation." (51)
> If we and other created beings do our very best to be in harmony with God, we will be most likely to be making a moral, just, beautiful universe. But, of course, we may live in such a way that we ignore our God-relatedness and do otherwise. Process theologians make it clear that we have the power of self-determination, and may choose to be one with the initial aim-or not. In our ongoing responsiveness to God and to others, we may choose either good or evil.
> God responds to the created world-to our choices-in sympathy and compassion, for God is interdependent with the created world. And so, we affect the Divine Creative Force, just as it affects us in infusing us with its creative initial aim.
> God is here and God is now, calling us to the highest. We are inescapably related to the Divine, and our choices affect it. Our lives profoundly affect other living and non-living beings. In this complex web of interdependent processes, we have the options of choosing death or choosing life."

This is a very nicely-written explanation. Also, very Unitarian! (-- and don't anybody get their knickers in a twist - I am a registered member of the Unitarian church where I live), in its focus on god (and not Jesus), and on its belief in a just, humane world.

> Of course, all the standard disclaimers apply.

Of course...

>I'm not saying that process theology is true. I'm certainly not saying that other views of God are incorrect.

... of course not.

>I'm just saying I was given a label to describe my beliefs, and I'm always excited at learning a new label for myself.

Heh heh. Me too. Funny how fascinating we depressed/anxious people find ourselves... (sighs)

best wishes, Dinah,




Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.


Start a new thread

Google www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Faith | Framed

poster:wendy b. thread:229113