Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Babble, lawful ? alex

Posted by alexandra_k on November 22, 2020, at 2:05:43

In reply to Re: Babble, lawful ? alex, posted by alexandra_k on November 22, 2020, at 1:45:46


the government doesn't want to employ smart people. the government wants to employ minions.

one of my friends had to beg and scrape and bow for more than 12 months to get an entry level position working for the government.

her job was to go fetch documents she was requested to fetch and scan them into the computer.

in response to foreign requests for information.

then she started to learn more about the requests for information that were being made. and the terrible reasons that there were (that were never formally articulated) about why, sometimes, information would not be released.

for example, issues to do with checking on rightful succession / inheritance of pacific island leaders. what was released seemed to depend on what was in it for new zealand...

and then other people. the jobs they had. hearing about the jobs. hearing about what they thought their value was (why there was such a job etc). putting things together...

i did not want to join them. no.

in Australia they wanted to hire PhDs for the civil service. the think-tank.

we don't have / we don't want a think-tank. we don't want smart graduates to become part of a think-tank and help us come up with an ideology worth working towards. we want graduates who are compliant and uncomplaining who will do what they are told when they are told. often times the actual jobs are things that we don't want done. for example, we are grudgingly dragging our feet on compliance issues. we are required to have people in these roles and we actually intentionally hire incompetents who prevent the job from being done.

we don't hire PhDs. we don't like to hire people with masters. we want them young and silly and compliant as can be.

our leaders don't want a think-tank. they are the leaders. our leaders are our leaders. they do all the things. they write the rules. if they don't like the rules they wrote they change the rules. they don't command or instruct or employ anybody to enforce the rules. they don't collect the taxes they are owed.

it's just a f*ck*ng farce is all.




Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post

Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.


Start a new thread

Google www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:alexandra_k thread:1111015